On Anonymity, Moderated Fora, and Usenet

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in

What kind of issues Mike, and why did you cross post your reply?

I DO apologize for the cross post. I will in the future try to remember
to see where my posts are going when I hit "reply."

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:jz14k.281$F97.75
@newsfe18.lga:


"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in message
...



What is irrelevant and insensitive about asking his age, and how long
since he had passed?




Not to mention his refusal to answer it.



The nerve.


Bertie

All Hail Fluffy! On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:10:27 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip whined:
"Maxwell" wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote...
"Maxwell" wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote...

I'm really at a total loss as to how to answer this question from
you. If I thought you actually cared about our loss and wanted to
know I would gladly discuss my son with you. I'm sorry but the trust
just isn't there between us for me to take the chance.

--
Dudley Henriques

How old was he Dudley, and when did he pass? Hardly a discussion.

I wonder why you wouldn't want anyone to know?

Um, why is this irrelevant bit of information so important to you?

Please help me to understand what loss have you suffered that requires
this
sort of constant and incredibly insensitive attack?

What is irrelevant and insensitive about asking his age, and how long
since he had passed?

Fjukkktard.

A clod, too. Dudley, I'd like to apologise for the k00k Maxwell getting
so out of hand. If it was possible, I'd turn him into one of AUK's
resident kooks, but never mind. Try to see him as something you can treat
as viciously or as callously as you please, if that helps. Otherwise, I
suggest killfiling him, if you use a newsreader. He's a human stain, one
you don't need -- his sole justification for existence would appear to be
entertainment for Fluffy -- All Hail Fluffy, for he hace much grateness!
-- one of the two Emperors of MEOW, and I don't see him (Max) as being
likely to entertain you much.

On Jun 11, 4:35 pm, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:
"HARRY POTTER" wrote in message

...



wrote:
So pathetic as to make excuses for the behaviour of an ass?

Do you blame rape victims for the crime too? How about leaving your
car parked outside overnight? Is that 'asking' some lowlife dirtball
to come along and vandalize it? Where does personal accountability
fit into your world view?

Since when is saying mean things on the internet a crime equal to rape?

It's folks with your mindset that create a society of immediate
gratification at the cost of long term good, i.e., if I want it then I
should have it...if I want to slam someone in a cowardly fashion, I
should do that too.

uh wut

And he never said he couldn't take it.

Then why did he feel the need to bring up, knowing it would derail the
thread into a pity party for him.

Good luck Harry, but you are arguing with one of Bertie's sock puppets.

Whatever, Romper Room man-child.

It's just as likely that HARRY POTTER is one of the voices in your
head; you both seem rather similar in style (juvenile) and tone
(angry) (and Bertie obsessed). Perhaps if you took your meds, quit
the booze and went to the gym (and worked out) you'd feel less
stressed and would be happier.

Hey! It could happen!

On Jun 10, 3:38 pm, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message

...

Sounds just like you and Bertie, self appointed moderators.

Sorry, but some of us disagree.

Who's this 'us' Skippy, and when was the vote taken?

The only thing they moderate is themselves, unlike you who seem to
want them to do something different.

Here's a freebie- try holding your breath until they change. Go
ahead, I double-dog dare yuh, punk! ;-)

On Jun 11, 11:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
HARRY POTTER wrote :
well written points snipped to make a bad one

Just because I'm saying something you don't agree with doesn't mean
I'm "trolling".

TROLL!

Bertie



Well, you are the xpert on matters of troll.

Maxwell wrote:
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in message
...



What is irrelevant and insensitive about asking his age, and how long
since he had passed?




Not to mention his refusal to answer it.

utter disbelief You think that just because you asked a question
that's absolutely none of your business, you have the right to an
answer?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

....and don't keep saying sorry. It's the most infuriating word in the
English language. Just a cheap way to behave badly, then shelve
responsibility by putting the onus on the other person to be forgiving.
Dr. Jackson

(from *The Chameleon's Shadow*, Minette Walters, 2008)

wrote in
:

On Jun 11, 11:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
HARRY POTTER wrote
:
well written points snipped to make a bad one

Just because I'm saying something you don't agree with doesn't mean
I'm "trolling".

TROLL!

Bertie



Well, you are the xpert on matters of troll.


TROLL!


Bertie

Teh Secretary to Teh Imperial Court of MEOW
wrote in newsan.2008.06.12.11.04.24.974632@meow.****head:

All Hail Fluffy! On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:10:27 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip
whined:
"Maxwell" wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote...
"Maxwell" wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote...

I'm really at a total loss as to how to answer this question from
you. If I thought you actually cared about our loss and wanted to
know I would gladly discuss my son with you. I'm sorry but the
trust just isn't there between us for me to take the chance.

--
Dudley Henriques

How old was he Dudley, and when did he pass? Hardly a discussion.

I wonder why you wouldn't want anyone to know?

Um, why is this irrelevant bit of information so important to you?

Please help me to understand what loss have you suffered that
requires this
sort of constant and incredibly insensitive attack?

What is irrelevant and insensitive about asking his age, and how
long since he had passed?

Fjukkktard.

A clod, too. Dudley, I'd like to apologise for the k00k Maxwell
getting so out of hand. If it was possible, I'd turn him into one of
AUK's resident kooks, but never mind. Try to see him as something you
can treat as viciously or as callously as you please, if that helps.
Otherwise, I suggest killfiling him, if you use a newsreader. He's a
human stain, one you don't need -- his sole justification for
existence would appear to be entertainment for Fluffy -- All Hail
Fluffy, for he hace much grateness! -- one of the two Emperors of
MEOW, and I don't see him (Max) as being likely to entertain you much.


I, OTOH, think he;'s a hoot and a half. That's three hoots for tow
dollars, or fove for three.

Bertie

gregvk wrote in news:Xns9ABB89952DECA01773E1E7C2A948@
127.0.0.1:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g2rstc$acb$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

wrote in
:

On Jun 11, 11:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
HARRY POTTER wrote
:
well written points snipped to make a bad one

Just because I'm saying something you don't agree with doesn't mean
I'm "trolling".

TROLL!

Bertie



Well, you are the xpert on matters of troll.


TROLL!


Bertie

Is The.Hardon trolling again?


No, he's busy making antohte lits I think .


Bertie