A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Have you ever...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old April 12th 05, 07:30 PM
Ron McKinnon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:SlT6e.6554$ff4.3707@trndny08...
Bob Fry wrote:
"Morgans" writes:

I hear of a guy around my
area who has not had a medical for 15 years.


Which simply shows that a medical (esp. a 3rd class for hobby flying)
is meaningless and should be eliminated.


Maybe for that one guy.


This 'shows' nothing, at all about whether or not "a medical ... is
meaningless and should be eliminated", 3rd Class or otherwise.
Not for that one guy, nor for any other. Nothing. Nada. Zero.



  #62  
Old April 12th 05, 07:38 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There's a lot of people flying out there without medicals. Annuals too.

Ron McKinnon wrote:
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:SlT6e.6554$ff4.3707@trndny08...

Bob Fry wrote:

"Morgans" writes:


I hear of a guy around my
area who has not had a medical for 15 years.

Which simply shows that a medical (esp. a 3rd class for hobby flying)
is meaningless and should be eliminated.


Maybe for that one guy.



This 'shows' nothing, at all about whether or not "a medical ... is
meaningless and should be eliminated", 3rd Class or otherwise.
Not for that one guy, nor for any other. Nothing. Nada. Zero.



  #63  
Old April 12th 05, 09:27 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron McKinnon" wrote in message
news:QsU6e.983868$6l.85862@pd7tw2no...

"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:SlT6e.6554$ff4.3707@trndny08...
Bob Fry wrote:
"Morgans" writes:

I hear of a guy around my
area who has not had a medical for 15 years.

Which simply shows that a medical (esp. a 3rd class for hobby flying)
is meaningless and should be eliminated.


Maybe for that one guy.


This 'shows' nothing, at all about whether or not "a medical ... is
meaningless and should be eliminated", 3rd Class or otherwise.
Not for that one guy, nor for any other. Nothing. Nada. Zero.

Okay, Rod, get off the fence and tell us what you REALLY think!!!



  #64  
Old April 12th 05, 09:28 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Without licenses, without prescribed ratings...

"Newps" wrote in message
...
There's a lot of people flying out there without medicals. Annuals too.

Ron McKinnon wrote:
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:SlT6e.6554$ff4.3707@trndny08...

Bob Fry wrote:

"Morgans" writes:


I hear of a guy around my
area who has not had a medical for 15 years.

Which simply shows that a medical (esp. a 3rd class for hobby flying)
is meaningless and should be eliminated.

Maybe for that one guy.



This 'shows' nothing, at all about whether or not "a medical ... is
meaningless and should be eliminated", 3rd Class or otherwise.
Not for that one guy, nor for any other. Nothing. Nada. Zero.





  #65  
Old April 12th 05, 11:14 PM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G. Sylvester" wrote in message

.......any time a person without a license
goes flying and crashes it's no accident. That is expected as it
is almost intentional.


Yes. A person who flies without benefit of a Pilot Certificate is by
definition unsafe. The rules say so. And all our acquaintances who
dutifully carry their carefully laminated certificates are, of course, good
and safe pilots because their certificates are on their persons.

sigh.....


  #66  
Old April 13th 05, 01:02 AM
Jimmy B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Grumman-581 wrote:
"Jimmy B." wrote in message
nk.net...

Yes, I have refused to fly with people who I felt were unsafe. I've
also refused to fly as PIC with people who I felt were unsafe. Being
PIC does nothing for you if the other person grabs the yoke on short
final and you both wind up as a flaming ball of wreckage.



Had that happen to me once... Before the flight, I had instructed him that
he was under no circumstances to touch the controls... He freaked out during
a bank, grabbed the yoke and his feet started pumping the rudder pedals... I
put a right elbow with a significant amount of force into his upper torso
area and he let go... If he hadn't, the next elbow was going to be going
into his face... I won't fly with him again...


Yep, that sounds a lot like my experience. Only, with me, I did a
karate chop right to his Adam's apple. His gag reflex made him let go.




  #67  
Old April 13th 05, 02:54 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michelle P" wrote in message Having hours and confidence does help
knowing I can take the controls if necessary.


What if the PIC scoffs at your concerns and does not relinquish the controls
to you?

D.


  #68  
Old April 13th 05, 02:59 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Capt.Doug wrote:
"Michelle P" wrote in message Having hours and confidence does help
knowing I can take the controls if necessary.



What if the PIC scoffs at your concerns and does not relinquish the controls
to you?


She said "knowing I can *take* the controls." She didn't say anything about the
other guy giving them up willingly. (It's amazing what a #2 knitting needle can
do.) :-)

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
  #69  
Old April 13th 05, 01:09 PM
Grumman-581
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ...
Didn't he kill some of his victims on a college campus? Well, a college
campus is a "Gun Free Zone".


Depends upon the state... In Texas, it is the *buildings*, not the public
areas outside the buildings... Even so, I consider those 'laws' just another
of the anti-2nd-Amendment restrictions that the leftists have inflicted upon
us over the years... What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do they not
understand?

Quite, but we need a "Relevancy Check" right about now!


Not really... I'm always armed when I fly -- it's relevant...


  #70  
Old April 13th 05, 01:13 PM
Grumman-581
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jimmy B." wrote in message
ink.net...
Yep, that sounds a lot like my experience. Only, with me, I did a
karate chop right to his Adam's apple. His gag reflex made him let go.


You must have either been in a larger plane or have shorter arms... grin


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.