A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hughes 269 LTS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 08, 06:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
Brien
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Hughes 269 LTS

What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.


  #2  
Old August 10th 08, 07:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
gk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Hughes 269 LTS



Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.


Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary
  #3  
Old August 11th 08, 02:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
Stuart & Kathryn Fields
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 328
Default Hughes 269 LTS


"gk" wrote in message
...


Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.

Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary


Where can I find a description of what makes one an LTS and what makes one
an HTS? I have never heard of this distinction before.

Stu


  #4  
Old August 14th 08, 03:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
gk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Hughes 269 LTS

Stu,

The HTS (High Tip Speed) assembly has a gearbox with a circular boss as
part of the casting. This boss fit into the tail boom and was secured
with 10-32 capscrews that went through the tail boom radially. The
blades were quite small compared to the LTS hardware. The army
complained about a lack of tail rotor authority when using the 269A
(TH55) for training. The solution was an adapter that replaced the HTS
gearbox and provided a mounting surface that was perpendicular to the
tail boom centerline. They then took the tail rotor gearbox and blade
assembly from the 369 series (500C) and along with a new tail rotor
driveshaft and control rod and now had a tail rotor that rotated slower
and had more effect. There were several other parts (such as the rear
airfoil) that were also replaced. This was all available as a kit which
was field installable.

I flew my 269A (with maybe the only surviving HTS assembly) for 500 plus
hours without any problems. The HTS assembly had a distinct buzzing
sound that could be hear early in the heli's approach. I don't recall
the difference in the tail rotor speed (the tail rotor gearbox had a
different ratio), but it was significant.

I have pictures of the HTS assembly on my ship if they would be of any
help. The Hughes manuals (maintenance and parts) still covered both
setups even though parts weren't available from Hughes (or later
Schweizer). If you need any more info, just let me know.

Gary

Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
"gk" wrote in message
...

Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.

Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary


Where can I find a description of what makes one an LTS and what makes one
an HTS? I have never heard of this distinction before.

Stu


  #5  
Old April 9th 16, 12:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Hughes 269 LTS

On Monday, August 11, 2008 at 9:56:07 AM UTC-4, Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
"gk" wrote in message
...


Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.

Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary


Where can I find a description of what makes one an LTS and what makes one
an HTS? I have never heard of this distinction before.

Stu


The Tail Rotor Authority is the biggest issue...But I still have a HTS that is flying fine...in 2016. Don't get yourself in places where you will run out of pedal and you are fine..
  #6  
Old September 11th 16, 02:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.rotorcraft
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Hughes 269 LTS

On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 10:06:53 PM UTC-4, gk wrote:
Stu,

The HTS (High Tip Speed) assembly has a gearbox with a circular boss as
part of the casting. This boss fit into the tail boom and was secured
with 10-32 capscrews that went through the tail boom radially. The
blades were quite small compared to the LTS hardware. The army
complained about a lack of tail rotor authority when using the 269A
(TH55) for training. The solution was an adapter that replaced the HTS
gearbox and provided a mounting surface that was perpendicular to the
tail boom centerline. They then took the tail rotor gearbox and blade
assembly from the 369 series (500C) and along with a new tail rotor
driveshaft and control rod and now had a tail rotor that rotated slower
and had more effect. There were several other parts (such as the rear
airfoil) that were also replaced. This was all available as a kit which
was field installable.

I flew my 269A (with maybe the only surviving HTS assembly) for 500 plus
hours without any problems. The HTS assembly had a distinct buzzing
sound that could be hear early in the heli's approach. I don't recall
the difference in the tail rotor speed (the tail rotor gearbox had a
different ratio), but it was significant.

I have pictures of the HTS assembly on my ship if they would be of any
help. The Hughes manuals (maintenance and parts) still covered both
setups even though parts weren't available from Hughes (or later
Schweizer). If you need any more info, just let me know.

Gary

Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
"gk" wrote in message
...

Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.
Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary


Where can I find a description of what makes one an LTS and what makes one
an HTS? I have never heard of this distinction before.

Stu



Gary....can you contact me at I really need your knowledge base
  #7  
Old February 4th 22, 10:36 AM
befonoy befonoy is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Feb 2022
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by View Post
On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 10:06:53 PM UTC-4, gk wrote:
Stu,

The HTS (High Tip Speed) assembly has a gearbox with a circular boss as
part of the casting. This boss fit into the tail boom and was secured
with 10-32 capscrews that went through the tail boom radially. The
blades were quite small compared to the LTS hardware. The army
complained about a lack of tail rotor authority when using the 269A
(TH55) for training. The solution was an adapter that replaced the HTS
gearbox and provided a mounting surface that was perpendicular to the
tail boom centerline. They then took the tail rotor gearbox and blade
assembly from the 369 series (500C) and along with a new tail rotor
driveshaft and control rod and now had a tail rotor that rotated slower
and had more effect. There were several other parts (such as the rear
airfoil) that were also replaced. This was all available as a kit which
was field installable.

I flew my 269A (with maybe the only surviving HTS assembly) for 500 plus
hours without any problems. The HTS assembly had a distinct buzzing
sound that could be hear early in the heli's approach. I don't recall
the difference in the tail rotor speed (the tail rotor gearbox had a
different ratio), but it was significant.

I have pictures of the HTS assembly on my ship if they would be of any
help. The Hughes manuals (maintenance and parts) still covered both
setups even though parts weren't available from Hughes (or later
Schweizer). If you need any more info, just let me know.

Gary

Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
"gk" wrote in message
...

Brien wrote:
What are the advantages of the LTS over the HTS.
Quieter and better tail rotor authority. Also, HTS parts are really
scarce and not produced anymore.

Gary


Where can I find a description of what makes one an LTS and what makes one
an HTS? I have never heard of this distinction before.

Stu



Gary....can you contact me at
I really need your knowledge base
A good detailed answer . Thanks for sharing.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hughes 269B Brien Rotorcraft 0 February 26th 07 03:12 PM
Hughes 500C LINDA BURGO Rotorcraft 2 October 11th 04 05:48 AM
Hughes Racer down MJC Home Built 5 August 6th 03 06:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.