A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Level and a half



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 23rd 05, 06:18 PM
Scott Draper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight Level and a half

Is there a proper phraseology for reporting leaving 33,500? The AIM
doesn't say; it always assumes you're at a whole number flight level.
  #2  
Old September 23rd 05, 07:17 PM
S Narayan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Draper" wrote in message
...
Is there a proper phraseology for reporting leaving 33,500? The AIM
doesn't say; it always assumes you're at a whole number flight level.


Why can't you say FL 335? After all 33,000ft is FL 330.


  #3  
Old September 24th 05, 12:13 AM
Blanche
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.

  #4  
Old September 24th 05, 01:05 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Blanche wrote:
Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.


Number one that's wrong. Number two that wasn't the point of the question.
  #6  
Old September 24th 05, 02:31 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Blanche" wrote in message
...

Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.


That's not correct. You're required to be on an IFR flight plan in Class A
airspace, but not all airspace between 18K and 60K in the US is Class A.

By the way, 33,500 IS an even number.


  #7  
Old September 24th 05, 02:38 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
"Blanche" wrote in message
...
Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.

That's not correct. You're required to be on an IFR flight plan in Class A
airspace, but not all airspace between 18K and 60K in the US is Class A.

By the way, 33,500 IS an even number.


Plus 33,500 is a perfectly valid altitude on an IFR flight plan if you're
climbing, descending, VFR-OTP, given a block altitude or on a cruise
clearance.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
please excuse my typing, but my whole left arm is in a cast. and i don't
mean _the king and i_.
  #8  
Old September 24th 05, 04:08 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll"
said:
"Blanche" wrote in message
...
Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.

That's not correct. You're required to be on an IFR flight plan in Class
A
airspace, but not all airspace between 18K and 60K in the US is Class A.

By the way, 33,500 IS an even number.


Plus 33,500 is a perfectly valid altitude on an IFR flight plan if you're
climbing, descending, VFR-OTP, given a block altitude or on a cruise
clearance.

VFR On Top at 33,500?



  #9  
Old September 24th 05, 05:21 AM
Blanche
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Blanche" wrote in message

Uh....if you're between 18K and 60K in the US, then you are required
to be on an IFR flight plan, hence only at even number altitudes.
33,500 is inappropriate.


That's not correct. You're required to be on an IFR flight plan in Class A
airspace, but not all airspace between 18K and 60K in the US is Class A.

By the way, 33,500 IS an even number.


My bad. I meant all thousands, not the half thousands that we're
used to in VFR.

Second my bad...what airspace in the US 18K and 60K is not
Class A? Not counting the big mountain in Washington state. (sorry,
can't remember the name)



  #10  
Old September 24th 05, 12:08 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Blanche" wrote in message
...

Second my bad...what airspace in the US 18K and 60K is not
Class A?


There's no Class A airspace over Hawaii, the Alaska Peninsula west of
longitude 160° 00' 00" West, the California islands Santa Barbara and
Farallon, and the Florida keys south of latitude 25° 04' 00" North.



Not counting the big mountain in Washington state. (sorry, can't remember
the name)


I think you mean Alaska. The highest point in the contiguous states is
California's Mt. Whithey at 14,494 feet. The airspace above 18,000' but
less than 1,500 feet above the surface of the earth in Alaska is not Class
A.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.