A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway observer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 4th 03, 06:32 PM
Jim Culp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway observer

Wishing you all the best. These thoughts come to mind.


Approach - Logic, and Arguments to be offered:

Be there, professionally attired with clean haircuts
and make a clear, reasoned presentation with good demeanor.
Anger gets nothing and must be hidden.

Prepare a simple quite brief position paper to be submitted
at the meeting into the FAA record following clearly
given oral statements of your needs and position.
Make no offers of any additional procedure or equipment
not required of pilots of all aircraft. For example,
there is not a requirement for radio in aircraft, so
don't offer it.

In that initial paper, essentially use logic; keep
it simple, keep it brief. Offer to operate as any
other aircraft at the airfield.

No need to detail the history of hostilities and present
no argumentum ad hominem.

Hold back a trump card, to be used in a later written
argumentarium on 'errors of fact,' for the event that
such may become necessary.

The later line argument, which one may cite, is operations
procedures as cited in Airman's Information Manual
on operations at non-tower controlled airports.

One may then cite into FAA the record, argument that
procedures which should be operated by are those defined
in the FAA Airman's Information Manual.

Sometimes, it is better to not offer all one's defensive
arguments until the opponent or agency advocating an
adverse but unconventional procedure has made their
first volley.

Thus, guard your hand.

If one offers all their arguments in round one, then
the initial ensuing FAA directive or finding can include
their parry incorporated into the initial FAA written
finding and they will be holding all the cards stacked
to their position without opportunity for useful additional
argument. Thus, hold back and use AIM for the come
back in round two.

Truly wishing you the best.

Dancing on clouds,

Keep it up!

Jim Culp USA
GatorCity Florida


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Slick Piloting 4 November 20th 04 11:21 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM
Runway Observer for Glider Operations rjciii Soaring 0 August 4th 03 05:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.