A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Skyhawk vs. Mooney



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th 07, 06:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Grant[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

I was simply wondering if someone could break down the cost difference
of a 172 and M20. Obviously maintenance on a mooney is going to be a
little more and the fuel burn is a gallon or so more, so just some
thoughts.

  #2  
Old May 8th 07, 06:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

On May 8, 10:03 am, Grant wrote:
I was simply wondering if someone could break down the cost difference
of a 172 and M20. Obviously maintenance on a mooney is going to be a
little more and the fuel burn is a gallon or so more, so just some
thoughts.


Depends on the Mooney. The M20C has about the same full burn as the
Skyhawk (8 gal/hr) but does 150 knots vs. the 172's 100ish knots on
that fuel. The M20C also sells for about the same price as the 172.
However, a M20C is more maintenance than a 172 and requires an A&P
that has more specialized knowledge (all A&Ps know how to work on
172s). Also, insurance could be a big difference. The retractable gear
will cost you somewhere between $500 to $2000 per year additional
depending on the amount of retract time you have.
A couple things to check for in a Mooney...
1) Fuel leaks. Mooneys have no fuel tanks, just sealant on the skin to
hold fuel in. Every so many years an owner is well advised to go into
the tanks and freshen up the sealent. If you are very rich you may pay
someone to totally replace the sealant but that is rarely required.
2) Gear actuator. If the Mooney you are looking at has electric gear
make sure the AD has been complied with the check the actuator gear.
Technically this is a recurrent AD but if the gears aren't chewed up
the first time you look, chances are you didn't get the bad lot and
will be good forever.
3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours. There is really no way to do this without totally taking the
plane apart (figure 10 hours of your time to remove all the panels
unless you have a one-piece belly). By the time you pull all the
panels off to lube you've basically set up for an annual anyway. Some
A&Ps consider this unnecessary and will sign off the 100hr ADs for 3
hours of labor, but there is no way they are actually meeting the
strict requirements of the AD in that time. However, know that there
are many Mooney owners out there that haven't properly lubed their
plane in 10 years and are flying all the time so you aren't going to
fall from the sky.

-Robert, CFII (and Mooney instructor)

  #3  
Old May 8th 07, 07:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Al G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 112
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...
On May 8, 10:03 am, Grant wrote:
I was simply wondering if someone could break down the cost difference
of a 172 and M20. Obviously maintenance on a mooney is going to be a
little more and the fuel burn is a gallon or so more, so just some
thoughts.


Depends on the Mooney. The M20C has about the same full burn as the
Skyhawk (8 gal/hr) but does 150 knots vs. the 172's 100ish knots on
that fuel. The M20C also sells for about the same price as the 172.
However, a M20C is more maintenance than a 172 and requires an A&P
that has more specialized knowledge (all A&Ps know how to work on
172s). Also, insurance could be a big difference. The retractable gear
will cost you somewhere between $500 to $2000 per year additional
depending on the amount of retract time you have.
A couple things to check for in a Mooney...
1) Fuel leaks. Mooneys have no fuel tanks, just sealant on the skin to
hold fuel in. Every so many years an owner is well advised to go into
the tanks and freshen up the sealent. If you are very rich you may pay
someone to totally replace the sealant but that is rarely required.
2) Gear actuator. If the Mooney you are looking at has electric gear
make sure the AD has been complied with the check the actuator gear.
Technically this is a recurrent AD but if the gears aren't chewed up
the first time you look, chances are you didn't get the bad lot and
will be good forever.
3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours. There is really no way to do this without totally taking the
plane apart (figure 10 hours of your time to remove all the panels
unless you have a one-piece belly). By the time you pull all the
panels off to lube you've basically set up for an annual anyway. Some
A&Ps consider this unnecessary and will sign off the 100hr ADs for 3
hours of labor, but there is no way they are actually meeting the
strict requirements of the AD in that time. However, know that there
are many Mooney owners out there that haven't properly lubed their
plane in 10 years and are flying all the time so you aren't going to
fall from the sky.

-Robert, CFII (and Mooney instructor)

The M20C also has a wooden wing doesn't it?

Al G, Mooney record holder



  #4  
Old May 8th 07, 08:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
flynrider via AviationKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 45
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

Al G wrote:

The M20C also has a wooden wing doesn't it?


Nope. The M20Cs are all metal. I think the last wood-winged version was
the M20A in 1960.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200705/1

  #5  
Old May 19th 07, 12:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

On May 8, 2:05 pm, "flynrider via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote:
Al G wrote:

The M20C also has a wooden wing doesn't it?


Nope. The M20Cs are all metal. I think the last wood-winged version was
the M20A in 1960.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200705/1


That's correct. I've flown in both an A and a J. The A owner
absoluetely loves his A. There is nothing wrong with an A, in of it
self, but you need to keep it hangared.

Greg


  #6  
Old May 8th 07, 08:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

Robert M. Gary wrote:

3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours.


What AD is that? I'm not aware of that. Is it model-specific?

The only ones on my list a
inspection of fuel injector fuel lines required by AD 2002-26-01
inspection of Bendix magneto ignition switch required by AD 76-07-12
inspection of Bendix magneto impulse coupling required by AD 96-12-07

Dave
  #7  
Old May 9th 07, 05:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney



Dave Butler wrote:
Robert M. Gary wrote:

3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours.



What AD is that? I'm not aware of that. Is it model-specific?



If that's true that is a deal breaker. Take the plane apart every 100
hours for a lube job? Pathetic.



  #8  
Old May 9th 07, 06:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

On May 9, 9:59 am, Newps wrote:
Dave Butler wrote:
Robert M. Gary wrote:


3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours.


What AD is that? I'm not aware of that. Is it model-specific?


If that's true that is a deal breaker. Take the plane apart every 100
hours for a lube job? Pathetic.


Your Bonanza doesn't require lube every 100 hours? You probably have
less panels to pull but most high performance singles require lube and
landing gear inspection every 100 hours one AD or another.

-Robert

  #9  
Old May 9th 07, 07:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,045
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney

On 5/9/2007 1:40:13 PM, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

You probably have
less panels to pull but most high performance singles require lube and
landing gear inspection every 100 hours one AD or another.


My '73 V35b does not.

--
Peter
  #10  
Old May 10th 07, 10:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Skyhawk vs. Mooney



Robert M. Gary wrote:
On May 9, 9:59 am, Newps wrote:

Dave Butler wrote:

Robert M. Gary wrote:


3) Also, if you fly more than 100 hours a year, you will end up having
to do an annual every 100 hours. There is an AD that requires all
flight control connections and gear sections to be lubed every 100
hours.


What AD is that? I'm not aware of that. Is it model-specific?


If that's true that is a deal breaker. Take the plane apart every 100
hours for a lube job? Pathetic.



Your Bonanza doesn't require lube every 100 hours? You probably have
less panels to pull but most high performance singles require lube and
landing gear inspection every 100 hours one AD or another.


Yes, I do. It's a 10 minute deal however. You said you may as well
schedule the annual for every 100 hours because of all the labor
required to accomplish this. That's pathetic and an absolute deal breaker.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A4-B Skyhawk Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 0 March 2nd 07 01:04 AM
Photos of 1:48 TA-4K Skyhawk [email protected] General Aviation 12 February 17th 05 03:39 PM
Photos of 1:48 TA-4K Skyhawk [email protected] Restoration 12 February 17th 05 03:39 PM
A-4 Skyhawk is 50 today José Herculano Naval Aviation 7 June 27th 04 04:28 AM
Skyhawk A4-K Weapons fit? Ian Military Aviation 0 February 18th 04 02:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.