Why didn't GWB join the U.S. Air Force ?

"Brett" wrote in message
...

So why do you demonstrate an inability to understand why illegal aliens
are
counted when the Constitution doesn't specifically say they should not be.


Your inability to explain your position says nothing about my ability to
understand. You said illegal aliens are counted for the purposes of
assigning seats in Congress for the same reason that slaves counted as three
fifths of a person in Article I Section 2 of The Constitution of the United
States. There is no similarity between a slave and an illegal alien.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...

So why do you demonstrate an inability to understand why illegal aliens
are
counted when the Constitution doesn't specifically say they should not
be.


Your inability to explain your position says nothing about my ability to
understand.

I did explain, the fact that you are a moron explains why you don't
understand that even an illegal alien qualifies as a person.

You said illegal aliens are counted for the purposes of
assigning seats in Congress for the same reason that slaves counted as
three
fifths of a person in Article I Section 2 of The Constitution of the
United
States. There is no similarity between a slave and an illegal alien.

No similarity, you really are a moron were they and are they allowed a vote
yet they both count in assigning Congressional seats.

"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...

So why do you demonstrate an inability to understand why illegal
aliens
are
counted when the Constitution doesn't specifically say they should not
be.


Your inability to explain your position says nothing about my ability to
understand.

I did explain, the fact that you are a moron explains why you don't
understand that even an illegal alien qualifies as a person.

You said illegal aliens are counted for the purposes of
assigning seats in Congress for the same reason that slaves counted as
three
fifths of a person in Article I Section 2 of The Constitution of the
United
States. There is no similarity between a slave and an illegal alien.

No similarity, you really are a moron were they and are they allowed a
vote
yet they both count in assigning Congressional seats.


You resort to name calling because you are unable to present a cogent
argument. Clearly, you are not familiar with the US Constitution or the
arguments presented at the Constitutional Convention.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...

So why do you demonstrate an inability to understand why illegal
aliens
are
counted when the Constitution doesn't specifically say they should
not
be.


Your inability to explain your position says nothing about my ability
to
understand.

I did explain, the fact that you are a moron explains why you don't
understand that even an illegal alien qualifies as a person.

You said illegal aliens are counted for the purposes of
assigning seats in Congress for the same reason that slaves counted as
three
fifths of a person in Article I Section 2 of The Constitution of the
United
States. There is no similarity between a slave and an illegal alien.

No similarity, you really are a moron were they and are they allowed a
vote
yet they both count in assigning Congressional seats.


You resort to name calling because you are unable to present a cogent
argument.

No, my reference to you as a moron is valid.

Clearly, you are not familiar with the US Constitution or the
arguments presented at the Constitutional Convention.

Counting slaves and counting illegal aliens achieves the same goal and the
comparison of the two is valid.

"Brett" wrote in message
news

No, my reference to you as a moron is valid.


Because I asked a question you couldn't answer?



Counting slaves and counting illegal aliens achieves the same goal and the
comparison of the two is valid.


Partially correct. See? That wasn't nearly as hard as you thought it would
be.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
news

No, my reference to you as a moron is valid.


Because I asked a question you couldn't answer?

No moron, I answered the question you originally asked which was "I don't
see the similarity. The slaves were in this country legally".

"Brett" wrote in message
...

No moron, I answered the question you originally asked which was "I don't
see the similarity. The slaves were in this country legally".


Who's the moron? There's no question there.

"Steven P. McNicoll" Who's the moron? There's no question there.

"Brett" wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" Who's the moron? There's no question there.


You have certainly answered that question!

"sanjian" wrote in
news:yYFJc.67$fB4.59@lakeread01:

[snip]

The big question is why we talk about the popular vote as if it's
actually fully counted.

That is the ideal for which the system strives. Its never
going to be 100% error free ( thats a shyster's fantasy )
but we should be able to make it pretty darn close.
However no matter how idiot proof we make balloting we'll
always find ourselves one step behind the really cutting edge
idiots.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source