If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
"Corey C. Jordan" wrote in message ... Hey Jordan, I see your little buddy Copp is still banned from usenet for life. Bwahahahahahahahaha |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Paul J. Adam"
wrote: That is not he fault of the GPS. No, but it's a human mistake. It's a training issue to make sure that when the GPS bings off a waypoint, you check a few landmarks to make sure you're where the gadget says you should be. Currently, that doesn't reliably happen because people have too much faith in the GPS. the GPS acts up or the information it provides isn't used wisely. That goes for anything and everything. Not just GPS. Training is very important. To quote a friend, "You have to be smarter than what you're working on." The trouble is, GPS is too damn useful. Mike Marron wrote eloquently about how a working GPS can replace most of your flight instruments... as long as the GPS is working. But it's a low-powered signal from orbit and it's easily jammed. GPS jamming isn't a feature of civilian life, but it's a serious military problem. GPS offers much more than any other navaid I've heard of, no wonder people turn to it first. Oh Bo....ks. GPS is easy to TRY to jam. Well known signal processing techniques are all that's required to defeat jamming. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Paul J. Adam"
wrote: Of course, if the GPS co-ordinates are wrongly calculated, wrongly entered, or the GPS battery fails midflight, that's a very lost formation... with no navigators to rescue them. Military aircraft GPS use aircraft power with transient backup, not batteries. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: The trouble is, GPS is too damn useful. Mike Marron wrote eloquently about how a working GPS can replace most of your flight instruments... as long as the GPS is working. But it's a low-powered signal from orbit and it's easily jammed. GPS jamming isn't a feature of civilian life, but it's a serious military problem. GPS offers much more than any other navaid I've heard of, no wonder people turn to it first. Oh Bo....ks. GPS is easy to TRY to jam. Well known signal processing techniques are all that's required to defeat jamming. GPS is neither "easy to jam", or an apropriate "replacement" for existing navigation systems. While Mike may have spread the snake oil in a manner pleasing to our ground pounder lune Paul, an instrument cross check is a necessity to maintain safe operations. Fused navigation sensors wisely take this instrument cross check and make it part of the automation; but as Ed points out, relying on only one instrument often results in errors. John P. Tarver, MS/PE |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Of course, if the GPS co-ordinates are wrongly calculated, wrongly entered, or the GPS battery fails midflight, that's a very lost formation... with no navigators to rescue them. Military aircraft GPS use aircraft power with transient backup, not batteries. One has to wonder why Paul is even posting to this thread. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
Harry Andreas writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: The trouble is, GPS is too damn useful. Mike Marron wrote eloquently about how a working GPS can replace most of your flight instruments... as long as the GPS is working. But it's a low-powered signal from orbit and it's easily jammed. GPS jamming isn't a feature of civilian life, but it's a serious military problem. GPS offers much more than any other navaid I've heard of, no wonder people turn to it first. Oh Bo....ks. GPS is easy to TRY to jam. Well known signal processing techniques are all that's required to defeat jamming. Harry, with GPS you're trying to not only detect a domestic light bulb in low earth orbit, but to pull useful signal out of it. Doesn't take much in-band noise to spoil that game, because there isn't much signal there to start with. Directional aerials, parking beam nulls on the jammers, games like that help but they also cost money and volume and weight. It's not the end of the world if the enemy whips out a few jammers, and it's harder to do well than some would have you believe, but it's still a genuine concern with fewer easy answers you suggest. If there's a cheap, quick, easy and reliable magic bullet to make GPS unjammable, then hasten down to your patent office at once. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
Harry Andreas writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Of course, if the GPS co-ordinates are wrongly calculated, wrongly entered, or the GPS battery fails midflight, that's a very lost formation... with no navigators to rescue them. Military aircraft GPS use aircraft power with transient backup, not batteries. Assuming a fully integrated GPS, rather than a civilian handheld attached to the glareshield as an Urgent Operational Requirement solution pending the procurement of the fully integrated navigation upgrade. Life is rarely as perfect as you'd like. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message , Harry Andreas writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Of course, if the GPS co-ordinates are wrongly calculated, wrongly entered, or the GPS battery fails midflight, that's a very lost formation... with no navigators to rescue them. Military aircraft GPS use aircraft power with transient backup, not batteries. Assuming a fully integrated GPS, Clearly Adam has absolutely no information to share in thie area of aircraft avionics, or systems. One has to wonder why Adam feels his validation of Mike Marron is more than just fluff. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
Clearly Adam has absolutely no information to share in thie area of aircraft avionics, or systems. One has to wonder why Adam feels his validation of Mike Marron is more than just fluff. Speaking of "fluff," you need some fresh bait. -Mike Marron |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
I don't mind if you can learn Mike, but so far, you are just another dip****. Coming from you (of all people!) that's incontrovertible proof that I'm in good company. See ya! -Mike Marron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |