A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

a few more newbie's pre-purchase questions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old January 28th 04, 04:05 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

robert wrote:
In our club in hot Aussie conditions, the CFI and his mob will discus
matters with you, if you take off without adequate water, a hat and a relief
system. The drop off in pilot performance due to dehydration is dramatic and
has been attributed to many accident. We have professional colour charts in


One of our local examiners thinks dehydration is the #1 most important
"medical factor" in glider flying. He (and I) believe a LOT
more accidents are caused by dehydration induced poor judgement
than the fraction of accident reports indicate.

I personally LOVE those little camelback things. I buy them without
the canvas bag, since the plastic bag itself seems very sturdy.
The Army used to prescribe 12 quarts a day during heavy exertion,
so I'm guessing 2-4 quarts for 4-8 hours of flight would be ok.
I drank three quarts during my 5 hour silver duration...
  #22  
Old February 13th 04, 03:39 AM
Jason Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As a pilot with ~100 hours, I really dont find the flaps that big of a
nusance, but the performance increase seems to offset the complexity.

Just think of them as a giant trim tab, forward to go fast, back to go
slow...


"Doug Hoffman" wrote in message
...
Ted Wagner wrote:

Flaps or no? (I'll be flying mostly in Arizona, more x-country than

local.)

Flaps pro: lower stall speed during landing, some performance increase
Flaps con: additional cockpit controls complexity and pilot workload


-Doug



  #23  
Old February 13th 04, 10:50 AM
Doug Hoffman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jason Payne wrote:

As a pilot with ~100 hours, I really dont find the flaps that big of a
nusance, but the performance increase seems to offset the complexity.

Just think of them as a giant trim tab, forward to go fast, back to go
slow...


No argument here, Jason. I started with flaps after only 20 hours of flying
*anything*. And my ship has no spoilers. Just 90 degree flaps for landing.
I don't find the increase in workload to be an issue. Btw, I've *never* had
my spoilers accidentally pop open or fail to connect upon assembly. ;-)

-Doug


"Doug Hoffman" wrote in message
...
Ted Wagner wrote:

Flaps or no? (I'll be flying mostly in Arizona, more x-country than

local.)

Flaps pro: lower stall speed during landing, some performance increase
Flaps con: additional cockpit controls complexity and pilot workload


-Doug




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 1 January 2nd 04 09:02 PM
In the plane market - some questions before purchase Bill Piloting 13 January 1st 04 01:20 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.