If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mounting "portable" avionics
Andrew Gideon wrote: On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:56:12 -0600, Newps wrote: There are several articles lately about installing the Air Gizmos mount. Mike Busch has been one of the most vocal. According to him and others this mount is the very definition of a minor alteration. Yet: http://www.airgizmos.com/faq.asp includes: Q: Can the Panel Dock be installed in a certified aircraft? A: The Panel Dock can be installed in a certified aircraft, but you will need an FAA field approval. BZZZZZZT. If a maker of a product does not get an STC they forfeit any right whatsoever to say what an owner or mechanic must go thru to install their product. The point of my post is that it is up to the mechanic to decide if installing this device, or any device, is a minor or major alteration. A mechanic who calls the local FSDO to ask them if it is minor or major is simply not doing his job. The FAA wants the mechanics to decide for themselves if an installation is minor or major, in fact they are required to. The FAA publishes a manual to help mechanics, or owners for that matter, decide what is minor or major. I've read it, it's actually a pretty simple document. Suffice it to say any mechanic who calls the FSDO to ask about the Air Gizmos dock is a moron, plain and simple. If you can count to ten then you will know by reading the FAA guidance that this thing is a minor alteration. Actual quote from the Mike Busch article concerning the Air Gizmos Dock: "Can you imagine an alteration more minor than installing a hunk of thermoformed plastic in your avionics stack? In my opinion, if you went to the FSDO and asked for a field approval to install the Air Gizmos panel dock in your Cessna, the inspector would probably fall off his chair laughing. (And then he'd deny your request.)" That's from page 8504. The reason he'd deny your request is because the FAA wants to shift the responsibility for making these decisions back to where they belong, with the installing mechanic. This is, by the way, how it used to be about 15 years ago. What the FAA really did when we had this big 337 brouhaha a couple years ago was to take things back to where they used to be and in my opinion where they should be. Why would the manufacturer provide misinformation that raises the cost of its product? Product liability is my guess. Where have these articles appeared? I'd like very much to read them. Do a Google search for Mike Busch. I've seen basically the same article in several places this month. The best one is in the July issue of the Cessna Pilots Assoc monthly magazine. A similar article was in this months American Bonanza Society mag. I wouldn't be suprised if there was one on Avweb. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mounting "portable" avionics
Andrew,
Q: Can the Panel Dock be installed in a certified aircraft? A: The Panel Dock can be installed in a certified aircraft, but you will need an FAA field approval. Why would the manufacturer provide misinformation that raises the cost of its product? Because the FAA is not consistent in this. It depends on the FSDO you're dealing with. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Frying your avionics | ELIPPSE | Home Built | 13 | July 25th 06 09:31 PM |
IGC-approval issued for EW Avionics microRecorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | June 11th 06 05:52 PM |
Has Anyone Used The "Approach Sport Hub Avionics Wiring Systems"? | three-eight-hotel | Owning | 7 | June 1st 06 03:28 PM |
time for avionics upgrade... | kontiki | Owning | 12 | December 11th 04 06:15 PM |
Used Avionics | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | December 2nd 03 02:53 PM |