A700

In article 5r47b.394145$Ho3.59154@sccrnsc03, "Juan E Jimenez"
writes:


No, that's your psychiatric problem, Bob, not mine. There's a difference
between defending it and explaining it. I don't have to defend anything that
comes out in ANN. If you have a problem with it, why don't you write Jim?

...and another yellow strips flashes down his back...

It's hilarious watching how you, the barnyard math-challenged animal and the
rest of your herd come up with all kinds of excuses to avoid facing Jim.

Juan



Not half as hilarious as watching you play the stooge by trying to defend him
and your own stupidity at the same time.




Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

"RobertR237" wrote in message
...

Not half as hilarious as watching you play the stooge by trying to defend
him
and your own stupidity at the same time.

Unhuh. And you're so amused and intelligent you can only come up with these
dime-store comebacks. g So predictable...

Juan E Jimenez wrote:

There are plenty of people who think that rushing flight tests for
marketing purposes is not a good idea.

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

Dave 'WTSOTT' Hyde

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

http://www.adamaircraft.com/pressreleases.asp

Why don't you enlighten us on what areas of the envelope you think _were_
sufficiently tested in the _two days_ after first flight in order not to
impact safety, Dave?

Juan E Jimenez wrote:

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

What areas of the envelope were not sufficiently tested for the
ferry flight(s) as conducted and how did that impact safety?

http://www.adamaircraft.com/pressreleases.asp

You're dodging the question. What areas of the envelope were
not sufficiently tested for the ferry flight(s) as conducted and
how did that impact safety? You *must* have some idea of the
envelope they'd opened prior to flying to OSH...right? So
was it sufficient for a ferry flight or not? Did they
exceed the envelope they'd cleared during the ferry? Was the
ferry flight unsafe? There are some pretty serious allegations
floating around here - I'm giving you a chance to clear them up.

Why don't you enlighten us on what areas of the envelope you think _were_
sufficiently tested in the _two days_ after first flight in order not to
impact safety, Dave?

You first, Juan...we're waiting.

Dave 'SETP points' Hyde

"C.D. Damron" wrote:


How Adam Aircraft satisfied their own standards and the standards of the FAA
would have been an interesting story for ANN to publish.

Your rhetoric reminds me of high school and college debaters that utilize a
"spread" tactic. The spread tactic widens the scope of the debate by asking
the opposition to respond to a number of points that are only marginally
related to the point in question. The strategy banks on the hope that the
opposition will not have the time or preparation to respond to each and
every one of the marginally related points or the opposition will not argue
one of these trivial points effectively.

The proper response is to jerk the opponent back to the point of contention.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Thanx, C.D.
It's a pleasure to read unabashed truth like this.


Barnyard BOb --

On 08 Sep 2003 06:17 PM, Juan E Jimenez posted the following:

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

You're dodging the question.

No, I'm not. Apparently you think it's a good idea to rush through
flight testing over a period of less than 48 hours right after first
flight just to be able to make an airshow. Is that what you are trying
to defend? Go right ahead, kiddo, knock yourself out and show us how
your lack of common sense knows no limits. g

You are simply not sufficiently qualified to question Dave's opinion in
the area of flight test, by any measure.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

Juan E Jimenez posted the following:

"Dave Hyde" wrote:

You're dodging the question.

No, I'm not. Apparently you think it's a good idea to rush through
flight testing over a period of less than 48 hours right after first
flight just to be able to make an airshow. Is that what you are trying
to defend? Go right ahead, kiddo, knock yourself out and show us how
your lack of common sense knows no limits. g

You are simply not sufficiently qualified to question Dave's opinion in
the area of flight test, by any measure.

Del Rawlins-
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Spot on, but....

When has jaun's lack of appropriate formal education, training,
experience or expertise, ever caused him to be bashful about
being difficult, denigrating and disrespectful to those professionals
here that are eminently qualified to speak on any number of topics...
aero or otherwise.

P.S.
Have you noticed how juan's "common sense" ...
more than makes up for any lack of legitimate credentials?


Barnyard BOb -- just an honest and sincere opinion

Juan E Jimenez wrote:

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...

You're dodging the question.

No, I'm not.

Then answer it.

Dave 'call and response' Hyde

In article CFb7b.395401$YN5.262669@sccrnsc01, C.D. Damron says...

Your rhetoric reminds me of high school and college debaters that utilize a
"spread" tactic. The spread tactic widens the scope of the debate by asking
the opposition to respond to a number of points that are only marginally
related to the point in question. The strategy banks on the hope that the
opposition will not have the time or preparation to respond to each and
every one of the marginally related points or the opposition will not argue
one of these trivial points effectively.

Thanks for defining the tactic both jaun and zoom use,I wasn't aware it had a
name. Great thing about this group ,there is always something to learn .

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon