Yep - 9-11 attacks predicted in 1994

"Morton Davis" wrote in message
news:xOlcc.189684$1p.2199553@attbi_s54...

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...

" RD (The Sandman) wrote:
But they didn't know when or where or how. Makes it a little
difficult
to put too many preventative measures in place.

snicker
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=507514

Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed
session
with
the commission's investigators providing information that was
circulating
within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an
attack
using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in
place.
The
Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has
obtained
a
gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets
privilege".

"State secrets privilege"??! Oh, boy--another alt-whacko type
uncloaks...
*Plonk*

Brooks

Plonk your head against a wall: Check a federal Judges Ruling in 1996.
It
was a hazardous waste lawsuit about/at Groom Lake, which is in appeals
as
of, now.

Another uninformed idiot who knows no facts.

Your unsubstantiated bull**** does not constitute fact.

-*MORT*-

OK, there it is then....* MORT* says so.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:22:10 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


" RD (The Sandman) wrote:
But they didn't know when or where or how. Makes it a little
difficult
to put too many preventative measures in place.

snicker
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=507514

Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session
with
the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating
within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack
using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The
Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has
obtained a
gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets
privilege".

She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave [the commission] details of
specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target
information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave
them
everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not hearsay.
These are things that are documented. These things can be established
very
easily."

And the piece concludes:

"It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims."

No, it concludes with this:
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some
senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public
with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption
within the FBI's translation department.

You are not a bright bulbed. The commission has already verified it if you
had ben paying attention. This is one of the reasons Mr. Kean has stated it
(9/11) could have been prevented. But of course you want all to believe she
is just another liar.

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...

"Morton Davis" wrote in message
news:xOlcc.189684$1p.2199553@attbi_s54...

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...

" RD (The Sandman) wrote:
But they didn't know when or where or how. Makes it a little
difficult
to put too many preventative measures in place.

snicker

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=507514

Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed
session
with
the commission's investigators providing information that was
circulating
within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an
attack
using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in
place.
The
Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has
obtained
a
gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state
secrets
privilege".

"State secrets privilege"??! Oh, boy--another alt-whacko type
uncloaks...
*Plonk*

Brooks

Plonk your head against a wall: Check a federal Judges Ruling in 1996.
It
was a hazardous waste lawsuit about/at Groom Lake, which is in
appeals
as
of, now.

Another uninformed idiot who knows no facts.

Your unsubstantiated bull**** does not constitute fact.

-*MORT*-

OK, there it is then....* MORT* says so.


What -*MORT*- says is plonk

On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:21:26 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


"It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims."

No, it concludes with this:
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some
senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public
with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption
within the FBI's translation department.

You are not a bright bulbed.

Brighter than you, Bryan.

The commission has already verified it if you
had ben paying attention.

It can't be verified but the commission has already verified it?
Who's the dim bulb here?

This is one of the reasons Mr. Kean has stated it
(9/11) could have been prevented. But of course you want all to believe she
is just another liar.

Since she wasn't hired until 9/13/2001, and then only as an
interpreter, it is somewhat difficult to believe that she knew what
was going on before that time. But then you'll grasp at any straw.

On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:21:26 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


"It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims."

No, it concludes with this:
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some
senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public
with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption
within the FBI's translation department.

You are not a bright bulbed.

Brighter than you, Bryan.

The commission has already verified it if you
had ben paying attention.

It can't be verified but the commission has already verified it?
Who's the dim bulb here?

This is one of the reasons Mr. Kean has stated it
(9/11) could have been prevented. But of course you want all to believe she
is just another liar.

Since she wasn't hired until 9/13/2001, and then only as an
interpreter, it is somewhat difficult to believe that she knew what
was going on before that time. But then you'll grasp at any straw.

Sorry about the duplicate post, but I pushed the wrong button before I
was through. Now tell us Bryan, if Ms. Edmonds testified before the
commission, how come the commission has no record of it on their
website?

http://www.9-11commission.gov/

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:21:26 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


"It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims."

No, it concludes with this:
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However,
some
senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went
public
with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption
within the FBI's translation department.

You are not a bright bulbed.

Brighter than you, Bryan.

Oh yeah, my brother can beat your father up. snicker


The commission has already verified it if you
had ben paying attention.

It can't be verified but the commission has already verified it?
Who's the dim bulb here?

You must not have been paying attention to the unprecedented statements
prior to the final release of report.



This is one of the reasons Mr. Kean has stated it
(9/11) could have been prevented. But of course you want all to believe
she
is just another liar.

Since she wasn't hired until 9/13/2001, and then only as an
interpreter, it is somewhat difficult to believe that she knew what
was going on before that time. But then you'll grasp at any straw.

Silly, you are. Is she the only translator working for the feds or is she
the only
one who has come forward? Adam?

----- Original Message -----
From:
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,rec.aviation.military,talk.poli tics.mideast,alt.conspirac
y
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:50 PM
Subject: Yep - 9-11 attacks predicted in 1994


On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:21:26 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


"It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims."

No, it concludes with this:
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However,
some
senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went
public
with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption
within the FBI's translation department.

You are not a bright bulbed.

Brighter than you, Bryan.

The commission has already verified it if you
had ben paying attention.

It can't be verified but the commission has already verified it?
Who's the dim bulb here?

This is one of the reasons Mr. Kean has stated it
(9/11) could have been prevented. But of course you want all to believe
she
is just another liar.

Since she wasn't hired until 9/13/2001, and then only as an
interpreter, it is somewhat difficult to believe that she knew what
was going on before that time. But then you'll grasp at any straw.

Sorry about the duplicate post, but I pushed the wrong button before I
was through.

Like I said, you're not a bright bulb.


Now tell us Bryan, if Ms. Edmonds testified before the
commission, how come the commission has no record of it on their
website?

http://www.9-11commission.gov/

It doesn't have anyone listed unless they were at public appearances, moron.
Like I said, you're not a bright bulb.

"Morton Davis" wrote in message
news:8LHcc.207294$po.1038445@attbi_s52...

"copertopkiller" wrote in message
et...


Another uninformed idiot who knows no facts.

Your unsubstantiated bull**** does not constitute fact.

-*MORT*-

OK, there it is then....* MORT* says so.


What -*MORT*- says is plonk



What *MORT* says doesn't make it so...after all he did
say the exact same thing 12 hours prior to this time. *MORT*
simply no credibility.

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 03:26:39 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


Now tell us Bryan, if Ms. Edmonds testified before the
commission, how come the commission has no record of it on their
website?

http://www.9-11commission.gov/

It doesn't have anyone listed unless they were at public appearances, moron.
Like I said, you're not a bright bulb.

So how does one confirm that she "testified"? BTW, the article you
provided says she was hired on September 13, 2001. An article on Tom
Flocco's site says it was December 2001. And apparently some of her
information comes from intercepts that were translated AFTER 9/11.
And the question remains, if she wasn't working in the spring of 2001,
how does she know what she claims?

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 03:10:51 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


Since she wasn't hired until 9/13/2001, and then only as an
interpreter, it is somewhat difficult to believe that she knew what
was going on before that time. But then you'll grasp at any straw.

Silly, you are. Is she the only translator working for the feds or is she
the only
one who has come forward? Adam?

Why don't you answer the question, Bryan? Or are you claiming that
she is reporting second hand information? That she has no personal
knowledge of events in the spring of 2001? I believe that the legal
term for that is heresay, isn't it?