A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

KAUG Notam Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old March 8th 07, 02:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default KAUG Notam Question

On Mar 7, 4:06 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
On 7 Mar 2007 07:54:54 -0800, "Jon" wrote:

I just got a ahold of someone who indicated the NOTAM does indeed need
to
and shall be removed. Now that the 3rd GEO is commissioned, the
availability
in the NorthEast is good enough once again.


Personally, though, you'd have to be nuts to fly in the cold of the
last couple of days,
unless you have some way of taking the heat directly off the engine
block!


I guess between all of us bothering various Feds, someone finally got to
someone who could make the decision to remove!!


No bother at all, Ron. When a thread comes along that actually applies
to what I do for work, I want to find out what's going on and see
about resolving the issue(s) if I can.

All of this stuff doesn't mean anything if the end user can't benefit
from it. Y'all could just stay home, simulate flight, and order the
$100 burger for delivery, right?

If the OTS was "properly" issued, because of the satellite being moved, it
does not make sense that it should only apply to a single airport in ME;
especially with our generally poor coverage (even after the new satellite
deployment) and also given the guidance published in 2003.


I'll see what I can find out regarding edge-of-coverage issues. It
comes down to where the "line is drawn", so to speak, but you bring up
a good point regarding KAUG being singled out. Was it the only one? I
haven't had time to look up if there were other locations at the edge-
of-coverage which also had vertical approaches.

An "unrel" Notam would have been proper, even then.


Perhaps. My best guess here is that a) the availability was so poor,
they felt it better to be safe and disable it entirely and b) to avoid
potential confusion, they decided not to use the UNREL contraction for
this purpose.

I have spent years, by the way, to try to get sufficient heat into my a/c
to fly this time of year. I still have some drafts to seal up, but it's
better this year than it's ever been. One of the changes was adding an
extra heat muff (done via a logbook entry, by the way).

Flying this time of year is amazing so far as performance is concerned! If
I can preflight in a hangar, I'm good.


Are you based up in ME or were you just flying there?

Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)


Regards,
Jon

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OSH NOTAM question Dan Luke Piloting 1 July 23rd 05 03:48 PM
KLEW vs. KAUG Andrew Gideon Piloting 4 April 16th 05 05:56 AM
GPS PRN NOTAM Ali Ghorashi Instrument Flight Rules 7 February 4th 05 07:40 AM
AF/D's and NOTAM Andrew Sarangan Instrument Flight Rules 9 January 19th 04 09:19 PM
ILS Notam question John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 6 August 22nd 03 11:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.