A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An Historical Perspective on the Wright Accomplishment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 17th 03, 06:08 PM
Gary Osoba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An Historical Perspective on the Wright Accomplishment


With all the attention and analysis currently being
accorded the
Wright Brothers’ accomplishments a century ago, a question

comes to mind: Is 100 years a long enough time to
develop a
balanced historical perspective of this achievement?

I would suggest not, if the reviewer attempts a perspective

primarily from the present and particularly if he is
only examing
the aviation-related achievements which have unfolded
within
the century since.

If we could take all of the flight-related dreams throughout

mankind’s history and stack them up against what occurred
at
Kitty Hawk 100 years ago today, only a minute percentage
of
them would find fulfillment in that event. Why is this
so? Because
from the earliest of time man dreamed to fly as he
saw birds, and
insects, and other flying creatures fly- under their
own power or
through the utilization of naturally occurring energy
forms
manifested as atmospheric discontinuities. Dreams which

centered on the use of machines to produce the power
for flight,
whether steam, internal combustion, or otherwise, are
relative
newcomers when weighed against the mass of history.
Even a
cursory review of the literature will reveal this perspective.

As such, I would suggest that when Paul MacCready’s
team
achieved sustainable, controlled human-powered flight
by
winning the Kremer Prize in 1977, the seminal flight
event in the
past century had occurred. Although the flight did
not result
from the flapping of arms or other devices so typical
of long-
standing human dreams, all of the elements were present
and
success was gained. As such, the vast majority of historical

flight dreams would have found fulfillment in that
event- not the
Wrights’ achievement, or landing on the moon, or breaking
the
sound barrier, or any of the other 20th century flight

achievements which are often pointed to as the most

spectacular.

This is not meant to detract from the Wright brothers’

achievements. Indeed their earlier flights with gliders
had already
achieved results which make their first powered flight
look small
by comparison. And it should be noted that their gliding

achievements would more closely fit the vast sum of
age-old
flight dreams by using naturally occurring atmospherics,
as the
birds and other flying creatures do. Nor is this meant
to ignore
the legacy the Wrights established as scientists; carefully

working toward an important goal through experimentation,
trial
and error.

It is interesting to think about looking forward, and
wondering
what more time might lend to the historical perspective.
I believe
that the majority and past perspective, not the present,
will
again prevail as the more valued flight form. It is
the most
elemental, the most pure. And, given the reality that
the energy
forms used in the bulk of powered flight during the
century
following the Wright event are either unsustainable
or ultimately
damaging to the world in the long-term, this will likely
be
reinforced.

Just a few thoughts on the subject.

Here’s to the Wrights, MacCready, and all pioneers
in flight!

Best Regards,

Gary Osoba




  #2  
Old December 17th 03, 08:07 PM
Vorsanger1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As seen recently on a bumper sticker: "God Bless Orville and Wilbur"

Cheers, Charles
  #3  
Old December 17th 03, 09:35 PM
Vaughn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Osoba" wrote in message
...
As such, I would suggest that when Paul MacCready’s team
achieved sustainable, controlled human-powered flight
by winning the Kremer Prize in 1977, the seminal flight
event in the past century had occurred.


I think that if you were to ask that question of 100 pilots, you would
get 100 legitimate, yet differing, answers; yours is as good as any. I
would counter-suggest that perhaps when the first aviator strapped on a
machine capable of actually carrying him to any one of thousands of
destinations with nearly 100% expectation of actually arriving, then the
seminal flight event in the past century had occurred. At a wild guess, I
would say that event happened perhaps 90 years ago.

Vaughn





  #4  
Old December 18th 03, 12:16 AM
mm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Osoba" wrote in message
...

snip
As such, I would suggest that when Paul MacCready's
team
achieved sustainable, controlled human-powered flight
by
winning the Kremer Prize in 1977, the seminal flight
event in the
past century had occurred. Although the flight did

snip
Here's to the Wrights, MacCready, and all pioneers
in flight!

Best Regards,

Gary Osoba


Now 26 years later what have been the economic, political, scientific,
cultural, etc. etc. impacts of MacCready's flight? Pretty close to zero in
most of the big categories. By 1929, 26 years after the Wright Bros.
flight, their invention had enormous impacts in all of those areas.
Choosing to view the importance of an invention by the extent to which it
fulfills primitive dreams is romantic, but I don't think it is how most
people view progress. The Wright's invention changed the world in many,
many ways; MacCready's was a very cool toy. (Besides, my flight dreams
never involve any extertion, and the Gossamer pilots had to work like hell.)
mm


  #5  
Old December 18th 03, 06:41 PM
Pat Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank you, Gary, for a lucid, thought-provoking editorial. And
thank you, mm, for an equally well-reasoned and well-presented
opposing view.

A pleasure to read both opinions.

Would that the newsgroup be ever so.

-Pat
  #6  
Old December 19th 03, 12:35 AM
Gary Osoba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Here's a nice thought to possibly leave the subject on:

The Wright Flyer and a MacCready MPA hang side by side at the
Smithsonian Air and Space Museum- the most popular museum in the
world.

Best Regards,
Gary Osoba

Pat Russell wrote in message . ..
Thank you, Gary, for a lucid, thought-provoking editorial. And
thank you, mm, for an equally well-reasoned and well-presented
opposing view.

A pleasure to read both opinions.

Would that the newsgroup be ever so.

-Pat

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: America Has Grounded the Wright Brothers Tom Sixkiller Owning 66 January 3rd 04 05:55 PM
Article: America Has Grounded the Wright Brothers Tom Sixkiller Piloting 71 January 3rd 04 05:55 PM
NEXT ON NOVA: "Wright Brothers' Flying Machine" Larry Dighera Piloting 0 December 13th 03 02:32 AM
Wright Flyer won't fly! Trent Moorehead Piloting 31 October 18th 03 04:37 PM
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience John Carrier Military Aviation 54 October 12th 03 04:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.