If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... It's hard to get hire into ANY new career at 53, much less one that would take a few years to build up enough experience to compete with people 20 years your junior. Having said that, I do know of one woman well into her fifties who is now recently qualified and earning as a part-time helicopter instructor, but it's not her primary source of income. Odd that someone NEWLY QUALIFIED would manage to be an instructor. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in message ... "Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in message ... "I"? I thought this was for your friend? :-)) Anyway, the simple answer is "Lots". Over here in the UK, we'd expect to pay around 15,000 GBP (around 30 grand US) just for starters. £15k will get you the PPL easily, but bear in mind he's asking about how much it would cost before he could start earning from it. Too right Si, which is why I added the "for starters" bit. At 53, it's not a "career path" I'd be lusting after anyway. It's hard to get hire into ANY new career at 53, much less one that would take a few years to build up enough experience to compete with people 20 years your junior. Agreed, but anyone who's not dipped his feet into aviation could be forgiven for thinking that it's not a lot different for any other career. They soon discover the costs are more than the likely rewards and that time really IS an issue, so age is a barrier. Those questions do make for a discussion though, and seeing as RAH has been a bit "light on the skids" of late, that's a good thing Beav |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... It's hard to get hire into ANY new career at 53, much less one that would take a few years to build up enough experience to compete with people 20 years your junior. Having said that, I do know of one woman well into her fifties who is now recently qualified and earning as a part-time helicopter instructor, but it's not her primary source of income. Odd that someone NEWLY QUALIFIED would manage to be an instructor. Maybe that's "Newly qualified as a CFI"? A friend of mine had never set foot in anything "aerial" before his 40th, but he learned to fly heli's after I'd taught him to fly RC heli's. He then bought his own machine (R-22) and pretty soon after was instructing in the south of England. Now he's got his own operation in Wales teaching heli flying. I would estimate it took him less than 3 years before he opened up his own "shop". Mind you...... he wasn't exactly strapped for cash when he started and earning a living wasn't high on his "must do today" list, which I'm sure makes a BIG difference. It was still a great accomplishment though and he's still a top bloke. Beav |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Beav" wrote in message
... Mind you...... he wasn't exactly strapped for cash when he started and earning a living wasn't high on his "must do today" list, which I'm sure makes a BIG difference. It was still a great accomplishment though and he's still a top bloke. Beav Wow! If only all of us could be in "that" position! The "not exactly strapped for cash" and "earning a living wasn't high on his 'must do today' list" parts, that is! I'm green! ;-) Fly Safe, Steve R. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve R." wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in message ... Mind you...... he wasn't exactly strapped for cash when he started and earning a living wasn't high on his "must do today" list, which I'm sure makes a BIG difference. It was still a great accomplishment though and he's still a top bloke. Beav Wow! If only all of us could be in "that" position! The "not exactly strapped for cash" and "earning a living wasn't high on his 'must do today' list" parts, that is! What, you mean you're not? Pikey bugger you must be -- Beav |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Beav" wrote in message
... Odd that someone NEWLY QUALIFIED would manage to be an instructor. Maybe that's "Newly qualified as a CFI"? Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I thought it went without saying. Afterall Si |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in message ... Odd that someone NEWLY QUALIFIED would manage to be an instructor. Maybe that's "Newly qualified as a CFI"? Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I thought it went without saying. Afterall Well no actually and it still doesn't, but maybe I'm a TC Beav |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Beav" wrote in message
... Well no actually and it still doesn't, but maybe I'm a TC Perhaps I should have spelt it out fully, but to my mind being employed to teach means being licenced to teach, and therefore CFI rated. Si |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message
... "Beav" wrote in message ... Well no actually and it still doesn't, but maybe I'm a TC Perhaps I should have spelt it out fully, but to my mind being employed to teach means being licenced to teach, and therefore CFI rated. Si Unfortunately, that's not always the case. In my active years as a full size fixed wing pilot, I ran into a couple of folks through the years that were "teaching" friends how to fly the airplane but were not CFI certified. For that matter, I could have taught someone to fly the airplane but it would be a moot point for obvious reasons. I remember talking to one "student" who was having a great time doing this and he knew that his "instructor" wasn't a rated CFI. I asked him if he was serious about earning his pilots license. He said, "yes." I asked him why he flew with his friend because he couldn't legally log the hours toward his flight rating. He said, "yeah, but it's still good experience." I told him that if he's serious about getting the flight rating, it's still a waste of money. He's still got to log that time under the supervision of a CFI. The time he had didn't mean anything toward his flight rating and the money he spent didn't either. He's not saving himself one penny as he'd still have to re-fly those hours once he got with a real CFI. He either didn't understand my point or didn't care. As best as I can recall, he never earned his license either. The thing that scared me at the time was wondering what kind of bad habits he was getting from a non rated instructor? FWIW Fly Safe, Steve R. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in message ... Well no actually and it still doesn't, but maybe I'm a TC Perhaps I should have spelt it out fully, but to my mind being employed to teach means being licenced to teach, and therefore CFI rated. AIR, you said "employed" but didn't say employed "to teach". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Third Military-Civil MAC Jan. 18, 2005 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 37 | February 14th 05 03:21 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Student as PIC in IMC? | Geo. Anderson | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | May 29th 04 05:09 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |