A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Alt.senile.artKramer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 7th 04, 09:19 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alt.senile.artKramer

From: (BUFDRVR)
Date: 8/7/2004 12:00 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Of course you must see that those who say I have no knowledge of WW II are
those who never were in WW II.


Not really. Much of my knowledge on WWII comes from authors who were there or
interviewed participants at the Strategic, Tactical and operational levels.

They, as far as WW II goes, are just wannabees


Are you serious? I love the B-17 and I would like to think if I wasn't
-(minus)
27 years old at the out break of war that I would have gotten a chance to
pilot
one, but I'm far from a "wannabee". I wouldn't trade my experience for yours
or
any other. Perhaps that's a bit egotistical, but it's true.

Then of course it turns out that they are all Neocons. while I am a yellow
dog Democrat. See a connection?


I grew tired and disappointed with you long before you went on your political
tirade and exposed your political beliefs.


BUFDRVR


You could try telling Art that all war is local and those who are there have
only the vaguest idea what is going on much further than the eye can see. When
I was in combat in Viet Nam I could tell you exactly what I had experienced,
but had no idea about the rest of the war. The same goes for Art. He can tell
you what it's like to be a bombardier in B-26s, but he can't tell you what the
men who PUT him there did nor could he tell you what the poor slobs in the
infantry experienced.

He has no idea the maintainers who fixed and armed that B-26 pulled additional
duties he benefitted from like KP, trash, latrine details and how they felt
about it.

Even today most aircrews have no idea how many people put them in the air
besides the base ops, crew chiefs, weather guessers and the like. I can't tell
you how many aircrewmen believed the crewchiefs knew more about individual
systems than the specialists. Nor could I tell you how many times I couldn't
fix an aircraft because the pilot/nav/FE/load was too busy to explain his
writeups beyond "I told the crewchief." This is one of the reasons I loathed
most aircrewmen who became maintenance officers.

Just as a matter of curiosity are pilots ever taught what drives the indicators
they rely on? If they are they frequently forget. I loved it when they would
tell me the rate of turn pointer on the ADI doesn't work so I need to change
the ADI. It's driven by a gyro separate from the vertical gyro.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #3  
Old August 7th 04, 02:00 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan wrote:

You could try telling Art that all war is local and those who are there have
only the vaguest idea what is going on much further than the eye can see.


I tried that. I even fessed up that I was so busy flying and planning during
OIF that I have no idea what happened in that conflict. He ignored the post,
which is Kramer's SOP.

Even today most aircrews have no idea how many people put them in the air
besides the base ops, crew chiefs, weather guessers and the like. I can't
tell


If by most you mean 51%, I'll agree, but if you mean more than that, I
disagree.

Just as a matter of curiosity are pilots ever taught what drives the
indicators
they rely on?


There is absolutely, no instruction on Forms, except reading them at any
training level that I've experienced. In fact, the idea of "just telling the
crew chief" is bred into pilots from (S)UPT. There is no maintenance debrief
during pilot training. If there is something wrong with the jet, the IP writes
it up (or the student if solo) and then hands the forms to the civilian
contractor crew chief on landing.The IP *may* provide a brief explanation, but
not always.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #4  
Old August 7th 04, 03:44 PM
Billy Preston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ArtKramr" wrote

War is not about gyros. It is about men who go out and
never come back as opposed to other men wo live their lives in relaitive
safety..And if you don't know the difference between them, you have never been
to war.


You had battles, they had war, get it?

Do you make this **** up as you go along?

I know about 100's of support troops who fed the fishes after their boat was sunk.

War is about all of the men, women, and children involved in the war or battle.
The bomb loader is a war instrument, the cook is a war instrument, and I would
even call positions on a bomber crew a war instrument. A 12 year old kid who
throws a grenade into a tent with a bunch of nurses and doctors is a war
instrument. The Japanese thug who knifes an MP in the back to steal his watch
is a war instrument.

You are wrong. Admit it.


  #5  
Old August 8th 04, 10:59 AM
L'acrobat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...



You still don't get it, do you?

Nobody wants to be like you - you are blinkered, ignorant and have made a
fool of yourself for years.


Takes one to know one.


Such dignity and intellect...


  #6  
Old August 9th 04, 11:51 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I never wrote about anything but B-26's or anything other than bombing from a
B-26.


IIRC, the B-26 was a deathtrap that killed more airmen in accidents
than in battle. Art raves on about it forever as if that aircraft
alone won the war which is garbage. And to make matters worse he
constantly talks about the bravery of the B-26 crews as if all the
other Allied airmen were ****, not to mention Luftwaffe pilots and
crews which kicked ass over anything Art or his crew ever did.


He has no idea the maintainers who fixed and armed that B-26 pulled
additional
duties he benefitted from like KP, trash, latrine details and how they felt
about it.


Our maintainers wwre all T/sgts an never pulled KP or latrine duty or even
guard duty but I pulled Officer of the Day and Officer of the Guard regularly
And if we never came back from a mission the crew chiefs would get a new plane
and crew in a heartbeat. And we would be only a memory soon to be forgotten.
And when the war ended these guys would live long and happy lives while we lay
buried in foriegn soil. War is not about gyros. It is about men who go out and
never come back as opposed to other men wo live their lives in relaitive
safety..And if you don't know the difference between them, you have never been
to war.


What utter BS! War is a team effort and those that survived deserve
just as much recognition and respect as those that perished. You call
yourself a Vet Art, what an asshole you are.You personally did not
build, arm, maintain, nor repair your B-26 or perform any other duties
that you benefitted from in the service.

Rob



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


p.s. Where can I buy a window sticker "I **** on Willie the Wolf"?
  #8  
Old August 9th 04, 03:35 PM
Marine55 @ iaol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:44:01 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
proclaimed:

Of course. When I was a conscript the 10% most intelligent went into the
Air Force and of those the 10% most intelligent went into Signals.


I thought guys went into the Air Force to avoid military service.
  #9  
Old August 9th 04, 05:32 PM
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marine55 @ iaol.com wrote:
Of course. When I was a conscript the 10% most intelligent went into the
Air Force and of those the 10% most intelligent went into Signals.


I thought guys went into the Air Force to avoid military service.



Where'd you get that dumb idea? It hasn't been that way since WWII. G



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN


http://www.mortimerschnerd.com


  #10  
Old August 9th 04, 07:31 PM
Marine55 @ aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 09 Aug 2004 16:45:04 GMT, (ArtKramr) proclaimed:

Your chances of suvival in the infantry were better than in the Amy Air Corps.


Amy had an Air Force?
Did Mary Sue or Jane?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.