If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
No lie. When we came back from New England in October, a couple of
jars of Maple Syrup in the luggage set off their bomb detectors. I saw them wanding and frisking a 7-year-old little girl! I surely felt safe on that flight, knowing that little blond girl was not carrying explosive maple syrup on her person. But many billions are being spent on a miserable failure anti-missle system, and hundreds of billions on an even worse mid-east war. Does anyone doubt that Bush's Iraq fiasco has made us far less safe? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
If you've ever tasted British christmas pudding, you'd realize that TSA is
doing good work by sealing America's borders to it. It's a concoction only the British could love! Shawn "Chris" wrote in message ... Step away from the cake, ma'am The latest follies of US airport security are pushing travellers to the limits, says Tony Allen-Mills Britons rushing to America to take advantage of the sinking dollar would do well to heed the latest US security warning. The Transportation Security Administration - also known to frequent flyers as Thousands Standing Around - has advised passengers not to travel with fruitcake. Apparently, the dense composition of "heavy" foods such as fruitcake and Christmas pudding might be mistaken for explosives by airport screening machines. A passenger whose baggage triggers an alarm might in turn be subject to intensive search procedures - and those are no laughing matter. No unsuspecting Briton flying in or out of Fortress America is safe from a poke in the groin or a fondle under the bra. While few of us begrudged the enhanced security that smothered American airports after the tragedy of 9/11, a recent tightening of already intensive screening procedures is provoking increasing passenger resistance. Here's the kind of thing you can now expect to see at any American airport. Jenepher Field, 71, a grandmother who walks with a cane, was led aside at Kansas City airport for a private inspection of her breasts. When an 83-year-old California woman was subjected to similar treatment, she complained to the screener: "For God's sake, what are you looking for? I've never had anyone do that to me before." Nor are men immune, as I learnt when flying back to Washington after a holiday in France this month. I don't really look the Arab-terrorist type - I'm blond, with blue eyes - and I was travelling with my wife and 18-month-old baby, not something your average terrorist tends to do. None of which saved me from a hand down my trousers after I was hauled aside for a random check on the gangway leading to the aircraft. I couldn't help noticing, as my wife and baby stood helplessly by and a screener peered at the metal studs on my Mexican cowboy belt, that several Arab-looking males were sauntering onto the plane. Of course, that's a racist observation, but it's also the crux of America's problem. Billions of dollars are being spent on unpleasantly invasive security procedures that are applied to who, exactly? Kansas grandmothers and blond Englishmen? The TSA responds that Al-Qaeda is almost certainly probing US airports for signs of potential weakness. If Osama Bin Laden notices that a certain group of traveller is immune from security checks, he will refine his recruiting efforts. "The suggestion that our screeners should pay less attention to grandmas and babies is like giving a free pass to terrorists," declares James Loy, former head of the TSA. I suppose it's just about possible that Bin Laden could find an American grandmother willing to board a plane with a baby packed with explosives. Yet I'm far from alone in wondering if the random nature of these checks owes more to the administration's fear of being sued for discrimination if it singles out suspect groups - single Arab males, for one. In Fortress America, a new book on post-9/11 security, Matthew Brzezinski quotes a former security director of El Al, the Israeli state airline, as laughing at American procedures. According to Offer Einav, at least 80% of airline travellers are good citizens who present no danger. El Al's system of passenger profiling aims to identify these citizens so that security resources can be concentrated on the 20% who may present a risk. "Israel's passenger profiling differed fundamentally from the American version," writes Brzezinski. "It was used not to roll the dice in the hope of ferreting out potential hijackers during a random check, but primarily to identify and eliminate honest travellers." So, what can a British family do to avoid being singled out for so-called secondary screening (look for the dreaded SSSS alert on your boarding passes)? Let me pass on a helpful tip. Choose your Christmas presents carefully. After a quick trip to Iowa earlier this year, I stopped at an antiques shop in Des Moines on my way back to the airport in the hope of adding to my collection of arcane American objects. I found a delightful tin can, covered with ancient red paint and bearing a handsome spout. It was perhaps 75 years old, and I thought it would make an unusual vase to put on the dining-room table. What I liked most about it was the yellow lettering that spelt out the word GASOLINE. I suppose some part of me knew that turning up at an American airport with a petrol can, even an old and empty one, might prove a risky venture. I figured I could persuade them that a terrorist would scarcely attempt to check in with a suitcase marked "Bomb". Well, you can imagine the rest. I missed my plane, supervisors were summoned, security lines were paralysed, and I was given a long lecture about security being no joke. I eventually got the can back to DC, but only after the captain of the next available flight agreed to take the risk of flying me. Happy trails, everyone. And stay away from the fruitcake. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Fry" wrote But many billions are being spent on a miserable failure anti-missle system, and hundreds of billions on an even worse mid-east war. Does anyone doubt that Bush's Iraq fiasco has made us far less safe? As long as you insist on interjecting personal political opinion in a place where it does not belong, I'll answer. Yep I doubt it. You are not looking at a possible favorable long term picture. By the way, when was the last time there was a terrorist attack ON American soil? I would rather have our trained, volunteer soldiers fighting on there soil, as ours. By the way, don't many new technologies take a while to get the bugs worked out? There are two views on every issue, and this is not the proper place to air them. -- Jim in NC |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article , ShawnD2112 wrote:
If you've ever tasted British christmas pudding, you'd realize that TSA is doing good work by sealing America's borders to it. Then again, Americans drink iced tea and drive on the wrong side of the road, so I couldn't ever expect them to understand Christmas pudding! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Morgans" writes:
Yep I doubt it. You are not looking at a possible favorable long term picture. Possible, rather unlikely. I've worked with mid-easterners for many years. There is no way they are ready for democracy and there is no way a government favorable to the West--let alone the US--will be installed, and last, in Iraq. Not for decades. By the way, when was the last time there was a terrorist attack ON American soil? I would rather have our trained, volunteer soldiers fighting on there soil, as ours. Oh, like the Iraq war prevented new attacks? I doubt even you believe that. Probably Bush doesn't by now. By the way, don't many new technologies take a while to get the bugs worked out? Yes, but you've missed the point. There are limited resources--dollars--to spend (in spite of Bush's huge deficits). Therefore the rational thing to do is seek the most effective marginal rate of return on those dollars. This we have not done at all, and I cited two examples: checking container cargo and chasing down Russia's loose nuke material. Doing those properly would give us far more safety than the current policies at much less cost. There are two views on every issue, and this is not the proper place to air them. Especially when a view contradicts yours, eh? If we can talk fruitcake we can talk Bush's simplistic and ideologic politics. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The words "fruit" and "cake" should never be used in the same sentence,
let alone be combined in some desperate effort to make a dish that is to be called "desert". C'mon, people. Is this not obvious? Dave Blevins (remembering Kroger's fruitcake with a shudder) On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:48:40 -0000, "Chris" wrote: Step away from the cake, ma'am The latest follies of US airport security are pushing travellers to the limits, says Tony Allen-Mills Britons rushing to America to take advantage of the sinking dollar would do well to heed the latest US security warning. The Transportation Security Administration - also known to frequent flyers as Thousands Standing Around - has advised passengers not to travel with fruitcake. Apparently, the dense composition of "heavy" foods such as fruitcake and Christmas pudding might be mistaken for explosives by airport screening machines. A passenger whose baggage triggers an alarm might in turn be subject to intensive search procedures - and those are no laughing matter. No unsuspecting Briton flying in or out of Fortress America is safe from a poke in the groin or a fondle under the bra. While few of us begrudged the enhanced security that smothered American airports after the tragedy of 9/11, a recent tightening of already intensive screening procedures is provoking increasing passenger resistance. Here's the kind of thing you can now expect to see at any American airport. Jenepher Field, 71, a grandmother who walks with a cane, was led aside at Kansas City airport for a private inspection of her breasts. When an 83-year-old California woman was subjected to similar treatment, she complained to the screener: "For God's sake, what are you looking for? I've never had anyone do that to me before." Nor are men immune, as I learnt when flying back to Washington after a holiday in France this month. I don't really look the Arab-terrorist type - I'm blond, with blue eyes - and I was travelling with my wife and 18-month-old baby, not something your average terrorist tends to do. None of which saved me from a hand down my trousers after I was hauled aside for a random check on the gangway leading to the aircraft. I couldn't help noticing, as my wife and baby stood helplessly by and a screener peered at the metal studs on my Mexican cowboy belt, that several Arab-looking males were sauntering onto the plane. Of course, that's a racist observation, but it's also the crux of America's problem. Billions of dollars are being spent on unpleasantly invasive security procedures that are applied to who, exactly? Kansas grandmothers and blond Englishmen? The TSA responds that Al-Qaeda is almost certainly probing US airports for signs of potential weakness. If Osama Bin Laden notices that a certain group of traveller is immune from security checks, he will refine his recruiting efforts. "The suggestion that our screeners should pay less attention to grandmas and babies is like giving a free pass to terrorists," declares James Loy, former head of the TSA. I suppose it's just about possible that Bin Laden could find an American grandmother willing to board a plane with a baby packed with explosives. Yet I'm far from alone in wondering if the random nature of these checks owes more to the administration's fear of being sued for discrimination if it singles out suspect groups - single Arab males, for one. In Fortress America, a new book on post-9/11 security, Matthew Brzezinski quotes a former security director of El Al, the Israeli state airline, as laughing at American procedures. According to Offer Einav, at least 80% of airline travellers are good citizens who present no danger. El Al's system of passenger profiling aims to identify these citizens so that security resources can be concentrated on the 20% who may present a risk. "Israel's passenger profiling differed fundamentally from the American version," writes Brzezinski. "It was used not to roll the dice in the hope of ferreting out potential hijackers during a random check, but primarily to identify and eliminate honest travellers." So, what can a British family do to avoid being singled out for so-called secondary screening (look for the dreaded SSSS alert on your boarding passes)? Let me pass on a helpful tip. Choose your Christmas presents carefully. After a quick trip to Iowa earlier this year, I stopped at an antiques shop in Des Moines on my way back to the airport in the hope of adding to my collection of arcane American objects. I found a delightful tin can, covered with ancient red paint and bearing a handsome spout. It was perhaps 75 years old, and I thought it would make an unusual vase to put on the dining-room table. What I liked most about it was the yellow lettering that spelt out the word GASOLINE. I suppose some part of me knew that turning up at an American airport with a petrol can, even an old and empty one, might prove a risky venture. I figured I could persuade them that a terrorist would scarcely attempt to check in with a suitcase marked "Bomb". Well, you can imagine the rest. I missed my plane, supervisors were summoned, security lines were paralysed, and I was given a long lecture about security being no joke. I eventually got the can back to DC, but only after the captain of the next available flight agreed to take the risk of flying me. Happy trails, everyone. And stay away from the fruitcake. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Dylan tsk, tsk... All that boiled mutton has affected your neurons...
Tis thee that drives on the wrong side of the road... However, I do prefer my tea piping hot... Now, having gotten the obligatory insults out of the way, I saw a blurb a couple of days ago where three British citizens were killed/injured in an auto accident down in Florida... The very brief article implied that they turned/dodged the wrong way in a traffic situation... I haven't heard anything since in the american media... Did that story show up in your press with any further details? I suspect that a lifetime of honed EU driving reflexes could be a major liability in a sudden situation on the road in the USA, and vice versa...... Denny - Irish by genetics, American by birth, Ugly by choice... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Denny" wrote:
[..] I suspect that a lifetime of honed EU driving reflexes could be a major liability in a sudden situation on the road in the USA, and vice versa...... Well, even though the UK is (still :-) part of the EU, most driving in the continental European Union should in fact prepare you quite nicely for driving in the US. Coming from German roads, I found it rather easy to adjust, that is once I got used to having much more space around me and everything happening at half-speed... :-) Season's greetings, Markus |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Adams wrote:
"mike regish" wrote: I know there must be something wrong with me, but I actually like fruitcake. ;-) You're not alone! We get one every year from Collin St. Bakery in Corsicana, TX. They are excellent. Ah, but the best part is the retail store in Corsicana. It's the bakery for the town -- wonderful brownies, pasteries, cookies, etc. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Fry" wrote in message ... But many billions are being spent on a miserable failure anti-missle system, and hundreds of billions on an even worse mid-east war. Does anyone doubt that Bush's Iraq fiasco has made us far less safe? Of course, everyone who is not a corrupt political hack doubts statements like that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | January 16th 05 06:48 AM |
Glue for wing step grippy thingies | Steven Barnes | Owning | 6 | November 28th 04 09:56 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |
STEP program helps advance hundreds of hand-picked airmen | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 09:15 PM |