If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ground tests & pilot logbook.
Just a curious question here. Normally when I fly, my pilot logbook
time starts when the hobbs meter starts ticking. That includes probably 10 minutes of taxing, runnup, etc. What about taxing tests on a experimental? Does that count? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
... On 9 Feb 2004 20:47:53 -0800, (Paul Lee) wrote: Just a curious question here. Normally when I fly, my pilot logbook time starts when the hobbs meter starts ticking. That includes probably 10 minutes of taxing, runnup, etc. What about taxing tests on a experimental? Does that count? IIRC, you're supposed to log from the point "the aircraft first takes movement for flight." If the purpose of the engine start is something other than flight, you don't log it. I think counting the time on the Hobbs meter comes from the way you pay for aircraft rental... most places charge for the time on the meter, so you might as well log it. If it's your own aircraft, your maintenance schedule probably runs off the Hobbs meter, so you're still paying for that time. Of course Ron, you're right, the .1 or .2 between startup and taking the runway technically aren't supposed to be logged. If one is taxi testing and inadvertently take wing, well, you can legally log that hop- I think you're actually supposed to. Also, I'm pretty sure I got air under all four of my car tires (at the same time) once or twice a lot time ago, but that's a logbook entry better left out... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:14:29 -0500, Jim Carriere wrote:
Of course Ron, you're right, the .1 or .2 between startup and taking the runway technically aren't supposed to be logged. Yes, they can be logged if the purpose was to fly. If you taxi'd over to the pump and back to the hangar it doesn't count. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Carriere wrote
Of course Ron, you're right, the .1 or .2 between startup and taking the runway technically aren't supposed to be logged. If you're taxiing out in order to intentionally fly it sure is loggable as flight time. I posted the FAA's definition of flight time elsewhere in the thread. As for how to measure logged time, I don't have a Hobbs or a reliable recording tach in the cockpit. I use 'wris****ch' time. Dave 'not P-51 time' Hyde |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
As for how to measure logged time, I don't have a Hobbs or a reliable recording tach in the cockpit. I use 'wris****ch' time. Dave 'not P-51 time' Hyde +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ KISS. However, you cannot believe how pricey and elaborate some doods can get in the name of flying.... even with a wris****ch. Barnyard BOb - anybody seen my $9.99 Timex? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"nauga" wrote in message
hlink.net... If you're taxiing out in order to intentionally fly it sure is loggable as flight time. I posted the FAA's definition of flight time elsewhere in the thread. So if you intend to go flying and taxi to the gas pump only to find they are out of fuel, then taxi back to the hangar - you can log the time to the pump but not back. I got it! Rich "It's all in the intent" S. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich S." wrote:
So if you intend to go flying and taxi to the gas pump only to find they are out of fuel, then taxi back to the hangar - you can log the time to the pump but not back. I got it! Nope. You taxied to the fuel pumps with the intention of fueling the aircraft. Once at the pumps, you shut down. End of cycle. Next engine start you go from the fuel pumps to the runway (with the intention of flying), and that taxi time would count. Russell Kent |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Carriere" wrote Also, I'm pretty sure I got air under all four of my car tires (at the same time) once or twice a lot time ago, but that's a logbook entry better left out... Those of you in Northwest Ohio, and many of the other flat states, are familiar with the "humps" that all of the railroad tracks are on. For those of you that are not, they are about the greatest jump ramps made. Some are even fantastic. Most front engine cars will jump, and land *very* front heavy. Ask a friend of mine, how that hole got in the oil pan of his parent's caddy. g I had a Corvair. They jump very nicely. I regularly cleared a whole second of airtime, and perhaps a bit more. After I bought my new car, my brother got the Corvair. It died of tin worm, and from the front unibody allowing the tops of the tires to be closer together than the bottoms.. not good. I later found my brother had made the track jumping into a whole new art form.... -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/04 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:14:29 -0500, "Jim Carriere"
wrote: "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message IIRC, you're supposed to log from the point "the aircraft first takes movement for flight." If the purpose of the engine start is something other than flight, you don't log it. I think counting the time on the Hobbs meter comes from the way you pay for aircraft rental... most places charge for the time on the meter, so you might as well log it. If it's your own aircraft, your maintenance schedule probably runs off the Hobbs meter, so you're still paying for that time. Actually, I believe maintenance schedules are usually driven by tach time. I got a hobbs meter in my plane, but I'm gonna chuck the thing one of these days. Never look at it. Of course Ron, you're right, the .1 or .2 between startup and taking the runway technically aren't supposed to be logged. Thanks, but I apparently wasn't clear: If the purpose of the engine start is to take the airplane to the runway, I feel the time should be logged as flight time. Ditto for the taxi back to the tiedown/hangar after landing. If you stop at the gas pumps on the way, you *don't* log the time from the pumps to the hangar...the purpose of the movement was not flight. Years ago, I pointed out this philosophy had an interesting loophole: I could log "flight time" when I was *not* in the airplane. Y'see, the club Fly Baby didn't have a starter, hence I had to hand-prop it. When the engine started, the thrust would pull the airplane slightly forward, onto the chocks or the limit of the tiedown rope. The airplane "was taking movement for flight," though there wasn't anyone in the cockpit. And don't forget: The flight isn't over 'till the wheels are chocked. Can't do THAT from the cockpit, either. :-) Ron Wanttaja |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Wing in Ground Effect? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 10 | December 18th 03 05:11 AM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |