A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ammending logbooks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 6th 08, 12:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Ammending logbooks

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:58:57 -0500, "Bob F."
wrote:

"Peter Clark" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:13:31 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Mar 5, 3:46 pm, (Edward A. Falk) wrote:
OK, new question: I put my logbooks (25 years worth) into a spreadsheet
program, and turned up a few errors in the process; mostly due to
misreading my own handwriting. In some columns, the error is as much
as 10 hours. Most of the errors are in my favor. Interestingly, there's
not a single mistake in the total flight time column.

How can I correct my logbook? One way might be to simply put the
corrected values at the bottom of the page next time I total up, but
I worry about having to explain the discontinuity to the next
examiner who's good at math.

Or should I put an entry into the logbook that says "these values
correct for errors in previous pages."?

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

If you end up with an examiner who adds up all the columns in 23 years
worth of log books my suggestion is to find another examiner who is
sane, rational and lives in the real world...

With that said your last idea to "correct for errors" is probably the
best way to address this issue.. YMMV.


Don't they basically do that if you apply for an ATP?



Mine just asked me "Is all the required time there?" I said "yes", and that
was the end of that. And believe me, I spent a lot of time going over my
log making sure everything was correct. For an ATP, your log is checked at
the time of the written. I believe it's still that way.


OK, thanks. I guess it's another thing that varies from examiner to
examiner, you hear horror stories of people getting out calculators
and going through years of books line by line.....
  #12  
Old March 6th 08, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dan[_10_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 650
Default Ammending logbooks

On Mar 5, 7:08 pm, "Bob F." wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message

...



On Mar 5, 6:55 pm, "Bob F." wrote:


The only hours that must be logged are those required for a rating or
proficiency, or dual given as a CFI.


Dan


Absolutely right. I noticed you said logged, not tallied. It's
interesting
about the CFI logging and often brought up at CFI refresher clinics. Do
you
realize and the Instructor has no choice when he gives instruction to
sign
your log? There's no vote! It is improper to ask "do you want me to
sign
your log book", He must. One the other hand, there is no requirement
for a
student to even have a log book (In many situations). There is also no
requirement to have a log book with you, so what's an instructor to do.
Well, when I run into the situation, I grab a scrap of paper, make the
notations and say "here, this is now part of your logbook". The only out
is, there is no TIME required to make the entry after instruction...
today,
tomorrow and year from now... Anyhow, a small discontinuity in the regs.


--
BobF.


Hmmm..


I thought the only *required CFI log* is the CFI's own log of dual
given (to be kept 3 years).


Sec. 61.189 - Flight instructor records.
(a) A flight instructor must sign the logbook of each person to whom that
instructor has given flight training or ground training.

and while we are at it:

(2) The name of each person that instructor has endorsed for a knowledge
test or practical test, and the record shall also indicate the kind of test,
the date, and the results.

This one means that when I recommend a candidate for a written test, I need
to track him down, get the results and record it. This one is often
overlook and I'll bet 90 % of the CFI's miss this. The "out" here is,
always do the sign off with your Ground Instrutor Certificate number, which
I always do. Guess what... no records required.



In the case of the student with no log book -- the CFI cannot
comply...?


That's the point I tried to make.



Dan


--
BobF.


DOH!!

You are correct, Sir!

Has there been any legal decision clarifying the "when" the logbook
must be signed?

There must be some case that established that by now...

Dan
  #13  
Old March 6th 08, 12:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob F.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Ammending logbooks

I thought the only *required CFI log* is the CFI's own log of dual
given (to be kept 3 years).


Sec. 61.189 - Flight instructor records.
(a) A flight instructor must sign the logbook of each person to whom that
instructor has given flight training or ground training.

and while we are at it:

(2) The name of each person that instructor has endorsed for a knowledge
test or practical test, and the record shall also indicate the kind of
test,
the date, and the results.

This one means that when I recommend a candidate for a written test, I
need
to track him down, get the results and record it. This one is often
overlook and I'll bet 90 % of the CFI's miss this. The "out" here is,
always do the sign off with your Ground Instrutor Certificate number,
which
I always do. Guess what... no records required.

In the case of the student with no log book -- the CFI cannot
comply...?


That's the point I tried to make.

Dan

--
BobF.


DOH!!

You are correct, Sir!

Has there been any legal decision clarifying the "when" the logbook
must be signed?

There must be some case that established that by now...

Dan



None that I know of. I guess it's never been point for litigation.

--
BobF.

  #15  
Old March 11th 08, 08:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Edward A. Falk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Ammending logbooks

In article ,
Bob F. wrote:

With that said your last idea to "correct for errors" is probably the
best way to address this issue.. YMMV.


I'll probably go that way.

Mine just asked me "Is all the required time there?" I said "yes", and that
was the end of that. And believe me, I spent a lot of time going over my
log making sure everything was correct. ...


Not an issue for me. Last time I was asked about hours, the question was
did I have X cross-country hours. My answer was that I had that many at
night.

Thanks to everybody for their insights.

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
  #16  
Old March 11th 08, 05:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob F.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Ammending logbooks

Interesting...and remember ATP cross country time does not have to have a
landing between, and distance is not an issue. It can be take off, track a
route (VOR, roadway, terrain feature, etc) maybe return) and land. The
examiner MAY want to see the route logged however. So you guys just
starting out, keep track of all your short hops to the next airport. All
those 8 mile trips count towards ATP XC. And if you took a 25 mile detour
to get there, it counts also, just document it.

--
BobF.
"Edward A. Falk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Bob F. wrote:

With that said your last idea to "correct for errors" is probably the
best way to address this issue.. YMMV.


I'll probably go that way.

Mine just asked me "Is all the required time there?" I said "yes", and
that
was the end of that. And believe me, I spent a lot of time going over my
log making sure everything was correct. ...


Not an issue for me. Last time I was asked about hours, the question was
did I have X cross-country hours. My answer was that I had that many at
night.

Thanks to everybody for their insights.

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/


  #17  
Old March 12th 08, 01:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark T. Dame
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default XC Logging for ATP (was: Ammending logbooks)

Bob F. wrote:
Interesting...and remember ATP cross country time does not have to have
a landing between, and distance is not an issue. It can be take off,
track a route (VOR, roadway, terrain feature, etc) maybe return) and
land. The examiner MAY want to see the route logged however. So you
guys just starting out, keep track of all your short hops to the next
airport. All those 8 mile trips count towards ATP XC. And if you took
a 25 mile detour to get there, it counts also, just document it.


This something I've been questioning ever since I got my Commercial
certificate. From what I understand, you can only count it as XC for
ATP if the trip was over 50 miles from your departure point. No, you
don't have have to land anywhere, but it still needs to be 50 miles.

I remember hearing (back when I was a student pilot) that once you got
your commercial, every flight where you landed somewhere other than
where you started counted as cross country, but I've never been able to
confirm this, so I doubt it's accuracy. It is, however, essentially
what you are claiming here.


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame
## CP-ASEL-IA, CFI-A, AGI
## insert tail number here
## KHAO, KISZ
"A common occurrence during compile time is a syntax error."
-- C: The Complete Reference, Herbert Schildt
  #18  
Old March 12th 08, 02:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default XC Logging for ATP (was: Ammending logbooks)

"Mark T. Dame" wrote in :

Bob F. wrote:
Interesting...and remember ATP cross country time does not have to have
a landing between, and distance is not an issue. It can be take off,
track a route (VOR, roadway, terrain feature, etc) maybe return) and
land. The examiner MAY want to see the route logged however. So you
guys just starting out, keep track of all your short hops to the next
airport. All those 8 mile trips count towards ATP XC. And if you took
a 25 mile detour to get there, it counts also, just document it.


This something I've been questioning ever since I got my Commercial
certificate. From what I understand, you can only count it as XC for
ATP if the trip was over 50 miles from your departure point. No, you
don't have have to land anywhere, but it still needs to be 50 miles.

I remember hearing (back when I was a student pilot) that once you got
your commercial, every flight where you landed somewhere other than
where you started counted as cross country, but I've never been able to
confirm this, so I doubt it's accuracy. It is, however, essentially
what you are claiming here.


I'm pretty sure that's correct, actually.


Bertie
  #19  
Old March 13th 08, 02:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Edward A. Falk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default XC Logging for ATP (was: Ammending logbooks)

In article , Mark T. Dame wrote:
I remember hearing (back when I was a student pilot) that once you got
your commercial, every flight where you landed somewhere other than
where you started counted as cross country, but I've never been able to
confirm this, so I doubt it's accuracy. It is, however, essentially
what you are claiming here.


I think every flight where you land somewhere else is a cross-country
flight, no matter what kind of license you have. Certain currency
requirements only count flights of 50 nm or greater.

My logbook is a mess in this respect. There are some very short flights
logged as cross-country, and many long flights (49 nm) which are not.

Different instructors do it different ways, and I tend to keep doing
whatever the last instructor did.

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
  #20  
Old March 13th 08, 03:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob F.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default XC Logging for ATP (was: Ammending logbooks)

Cross country distance definitions are different for different ratings.
There is no general definition in time, direction, endurance or whatever for
cross country otherwise. The ATP has NO definition for it. It just says
500 hours total "cross country". It is left up to the examiner to determine
what that is. As far as your log book goes, as I said earlier, what you
need to do is record the activity and the time. But when it comes time to
add the time up for a rating, make sure you pick up the right lines.
Logbooks are not really set up for this dynamic. This is where spreadsheets
and database software helps. So I stopped adding up the rows. I keep a
paper log, where signatures and endorsements are recorded, and transfer the
time to a spreadsheet log. This was particularly useful when I bought my
first couple airplanes and the insurance asked for time in different ways,
such as time in type, 4 place time, retract time, time in blue airplanes,
time in red airplanes, ...oops got carried away there.

But back to the subject , for the ATP I never found and examiner where he
cared about distance but is you don't show the route and/or how you
navigated it, he will not allow it to be counted. If you recorded you
traveled 100 mi to and airport and recorded that, he'll assume you navigated
there somehow. But if it's a "local flight", i.e., took off, flew 70 miles
along a shore line and returned without a landing during that flight, you'd
better record it as such if you want it counted. This comes into play for
people who fly pipelines or traffic patrol who never go very far but follow
a specified route.
--
BobF.
"Edward A. Falk" wrote in message
...
In article , Mark T. Dame wrote:
I remember hearing (back when I was a student pilot) that once you got
your commercial, every flight where you landed somewhere other than
where you started counted as cross country, but I've never been able to
confirm this, so I doubt it's accuracy. It is, however, essentially
what you are claiming here.


I think every flight where you land somewhere else is a cross-country
flight, no matter what kind of license you have. Certain currency
requirements only count flights of 50 nm or greater.

My logbook is a mess in this respect. There are some very short flights
logged as cross-country, and many long flights (49 nm) which are not.

Different instructors do it different ways, and I tend to keep doing
whatever the last instructor did.

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changing Logbooks Steve Foley Piloting 21 April 12th 07 03:04 PM
Electronic Logbooks daniel.bascomb Piloting 19 December 21st 06 08:42 PM
Falsified logbooks? Close to home... Dave S Owning 1 April 6th 06 10:40 PM
Logbooks? der flieger Products 0 April 13th 05 02:44 PM
NR abbreviation in logbooks Jeremy Lew Piloting 11 November 19th 03 03:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.