If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Scott MacEachern wrote: On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 05:52:52 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: Which, oddly enough, seems to have been quoted without attribution from that same Mark Phythian guy who keeps selling books based on the idea that the US and Britain armed Iraq (while ignoring everyone else, who *really* sold them the weapons, and are still trying to collect on the bills). Pythian's book quotes those same sources, IIRC. And the book never denies that the bulk of Saddam's weapons came from other countries: he was addressing the widespread, comfortable belief in Britain and the USA that neither of those countries had anything to do with it. Well, he's addressing his own contention, but since nobody ever really denied it, and since he took that nice controversial title, the rest of his claims are, let's say, less reliable. "Arming Iraq: How the U.S. and Britain Secretly Built Saddam's War Machine" pretty much says it all. Not "sold a tiny amount of weapons," not "let everyone else in the world sell them a hundred times as much." -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:26:09 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
Well, he's addressing his own contention, but since nobody ever really denied it, and since he took that nice controversial title, the rest of his claims are, let's say, less reliable. ? There seems to have been quite a bit of denial of it. And I'm not sure that coming up with a controversial title for a book necessarily indicates that the contents are invalid.. more likely thatthe author and publisher want to see a lot of copies. I certainly don't think that adding "sold a tiny amount of weapons" would've made it more accurate. Scott |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:21:20 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
I dunno. Copters in the desert for 20 years? Very maintenance intensive. It's likely that if they could keep fighters flying (as they did occasionally) they could do the same with helicopters. As for spares availability, who knows? We don't know what parts inventories were bought with the helicopters, nor how successful at cannabilisng they were. Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aerobatics and children | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 7 | December 26th 04 09:27 AM |
Children remember | dave | Home Built | 3 | October 29th 03 01:33 PM |
Alleged Charles Lindbergh "love children" | Lawrence Dillard | Military Aviation | 2 | August 7th 03 02:47 AM |
Why the Royal Australian Air Force went for Israeli Python-4 AAM's over US AIM-9L's | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 79 | July 19th 03 03:33 AM |