A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US "heroes" kill 9 children



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old December 13th 03, 05:26 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Scott MacEachern wrote:

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 05:52:52 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:

Which, oddly enough, seems to have been quoted without attribution from
that same Mark Phythian guy who keeps selling books based on the idea
that the US and Britain armed Iraq (while ignoring everyone else, who
*really* sold them the weapons, and are still trying to collect on the
bills).


Pythian's book quotes those same sources, IIRC. And the book never
denies that the bulk of Saddam's weapons came from other countries: he
was addressing the widespread, comfortable belief in Britain and the
USA that neither of those countries had anything to do with it.


Well, he's addressing his own contention, but since nobody ever really
denied it, and since he took that nice controversial title, the rest of
his claims are, let's say, less reliable.

"Arming Iraq: How the U.S. and Britain Secretly Built Saddam's War
Machine" pretty much says it all. Not "sold a tiny amount of weapons,"
not "let everyone else in the world sell them a hundred times as much."

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #52  
Old December 13th 03, 08:27 PM
Scott MacEachern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:26:09 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:

Well, he's addressing his own contention, but since nobody ever really
denied it, and since he took that nice controversial title, the rest of
his claims are, let's say, less reliable.


? There seems to have been quite a bit of denial of it. And I'm not
sure that coming up with a controversial title for a book necessarily
indicates that the contents are invalid.. more likely thatthe author
and publisher want to see a lot of copies. I certainly don't think
that adding "sold a tiny amount of weapons" would've made it more
accurate.

Scott

  #53  
Old December 13th 03, 08:29 PM
Scott MacEachern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:21:20 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:

I dunno. Copters in the desert for 20 years? Very maintenance
intensive.


It's likely that if they could keep fighters flying (as they did
occasionally) they could do the same with helicopters. As for spares
availability, who knows? We don't know what parts inventories were
bought with the helicopters, nor how successful at cannabilisng they
were.

Scott

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerobatics and children [email protected] Aerobatics 7 December 26th 04 09:27 AM
Children remember dave Home Built 3 October 29th 03 01:33 PM
Alleged Charles Lindbergh "love children" Lawrence Dillard Military Aviation 2 August 7th 03 02:47 AM
Why the Royal Australian Air Force went for Israeli Python-4 AAM's over US AIM-9L's Urban Fredriksson Military Aviation 79 July 19th 03 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.