A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Test



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 23rd 08, 02:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Gig 601Xl Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 683
Default Test

stol wrote:


Geez... They can put a man on the moon but cannot standardize a
posting format.... Hmmm, maybe they didn't get to the moon afterall..
G


Well they kind of did standardize a posting format for USENET. Plain Text.
  #12  
Old July 24th 08, 03:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
stol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default Test

On Jul 23, 7:11*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:
stol wrote:

Geez... They can put a man on the moon but cannot standardize a
posting format.... Hmmm, maybe they didn't get to the moon afterall..
G


Well they kind of did standardize a posting format for USENET. Plain Text..




:)......


Ben
  #13  
Old July 25th 08, 07:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bruce A. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Test

Truthfully Jay, it comes across to me as whether you leave the toilet
seat up or whether you leave the toilet seat down. All the changes that
can be made to my newsreader have been and I can apparently set mine up
to screen out html by detecting the codes...and this reader is at least
9 years old.

Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-07-22, Bruce A. Frank wrote:
Wait till I post a picture! I see the net nannies are alive and vocal as
ever. Jay, I am using the news reader in Netscape 4.2. I am lucky it is
functioning at all. Please filter me out. I did not know that the Internet
Newsgroups were still arguing about the "politeness" of bandwidth.


It's not the bandwidth that's impolite. It's that not everyone reads Usenet
with a web browser. This is merely annoying when it's limited to text; it's
rude beyond belief when you include pictures and other, non-text items.

Here's what your message looks like in a pure text newsreader:

html
Wait till I post a picture! I see the net nannies are alive and vocal as
ever. Jay, I am using the news reader in Netscape 4.2. I am lucky it is
functioning at all. Please filter me out. I did not know that the Internet
Newsgroups were still arguing about the "politeness" of bandwidth.
pJay Maynard wrote:
blockquote TYPE=CITEOn 2008-07-20, Bruce A. Frank
wrote:
br<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"
br<html
br Is this post making it through? Having some problems with the program
I
br use to access RAH.</html
pIt's making it through, but as HTML. This is antisocial. Please turn
off
brHTML posting in your newsreader.
br--
brJay Maynard, K5ZC       &nbs p;           
a href="http://www.conmicro.com"http://www.conmicro.com/a
bra href="http://jmaynard.livejournal.com"http://jmaynard.livejournal.com/a     
a href="http://www.tronguy.net"http://www.tronguy.net/a
brFairmont, MN (FRM)       &nb sp;       &nbsp ;       
(Yes, that's me!)
brAMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)/blockquote
/html

--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)

  #14  
Old July 25th 08, 12:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default Test

On 2008-07-25, Bruce A. Frank wrote:
Truthfully Jay, it comes across to me as whether you leave the toilet
seat up or whether you leave the toilet seat down. All the changes that
can be made to my newsreader have been and I can apparently set mine up
to screen out html by detecting the codes...and this reader is at least
9 years old.


It's not a matter of age or moderniy. It's a matter of courtesy to those who
read Usenet with non-HTML-capable readers. I do this deliberately, because
it allows me to read the groups from whatever computer I'm at and still
maintain my position within each group. It's also faster. Similarly, I read
email with a text-only reader from the same system, so I can do so from any
computer anywhere on the net. That renders me immune to email viruses.

I don't use an HTML-capable email or news reader for what turn out to be
very good reasons. It' not that I refuse to join the modern era at all. It's
that Usenet and email are text media, and using HTML in them is not the way
they were designed to be used. The only HTML email I get is from spammers,
and HTML email is quite likely to get dropped straight into the bit bucket.
Usenet is, if anything, even more text-only.

Please respect others' choices, and leave HTML turned off (as you have it
now).
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)
  #15  
Old July 26th 08, 12:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Test

"Jay Maynard" wrote in message
...
On 2008-07-25, Bruce A. Frank wrote:
Truthfully Jay, it comes across to me as whether you leave the toilet
seat up or whether you leave the toilet seat down. All the changes that
can be made to my newsreader have been and I can apparently set mine up
to screen out html by detecting the codes...and this reader is at least
9 years old.


It's not a matter of age or moderniy. It's a matter of courtesy to those
who
read Usenet with non-HTML-capable readers. I do this deliberately, because
it allows me to read the groups from whatever computer I'm at and still
maintain my position within each group. It's also faster. Similarly, I
read
email with a text-only reader from the same system, so I can do so from
any
computer anywhere on the net. That renders me immune to email viruses.

I don't use an HTML-capable email or news reader for what turn out to be
very good reasons. It' not that I refuse to join the modern era at all.
It's
that Usenet and email are text media, and using HTML in them is not the
way
they were designed to be used. The only HTML email I get is from spammers,
and HTML email is quite likely to get dropped straight into the bit
bucket.
Usenet is, if anything, even more text-only.

Please respect others' choices, and leave HTML turned off (as you have it
now).
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)


All very well said!

Peter



  #16  
Old July 30th 08, 09:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bruce A. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Test

Hmm, I thought HTML *IS* text.

Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-07-25, Bruce A. Frank wrote:
Truthfully Jay, it comes across to me as whether you leave the toilet
seat up or whether you leave the toilet seat down. All the changes that
can be made to my newsreader have been and I can apparently set mine up
to screen out html by detecting the codes...and this reader is at least
9 years old.


It's not a matter of age or moderniy. It's a matter of courtesy to those who
read Usenet with non-HTML-capable readers. I do this deliberately, because
it allows me to read the groups from whatever computer I'm at and still
maintain my position within each group. It's also faster. Similarly, I read
email with a text-only reader from the same system, so I can do so from any
computer anywhere on the net. That renders me immune to email viruses.

I don't use an HTML-capable email or news reader for what turn out to be
very good reasons. It' not that I refuse to join the modern era at all. It's
that Usenet and email are text media, and using HTML in them is not the way
they were designed to be used. The only HTML email I get is from spammers,
and HTML email is quite likely to get dropped straight into the bit bucket.
Usenet is, if anything, even more text-only.

Please respect others' choices, and leave HTML turned off (as you have it
now).
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)

  #17  
Old July 30th 08, 10:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
cavelamb himself[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 474
Default Test

Bruce A. Frank wrote:
Hmm, I thought HTML *IS* text.




Well, it is, and it ain't.


Yes, it's all ASCII text, but HTML has LOTS of extra stuff (albeit text)
to mark up the "text".



For instance "Hello World" in text... 11 bytes.

vs


HTML
HEAD
!-- $MVD$:app("MicroVision WebExpress","769") --
!-- $MVD$:template("","0","0") --
!-- $MVD$:fontset("Comic Sans","Comic Sans MS","Comic Sans","Times
New Roman") --
TITLEUntitled/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
P
FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS,Comic Sans,Times New Roman"!--
$MVD$:spaceretainer() -- /FONT/P
P
TABLE WIDTH="100%" CELLPADDING="2" CELLSPACING="0" BORDER="0"
TR
TD WIDTH="100%" VALIGN=TOP
P
FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS,Comic Sans,Times New Roman"FONT
SIZE="6"H/FONTello
FONT SIZE="6"W/FONTorld!/FONT/TD
/TR
/TABLE
/BODY
/HTML




This is what HTML could look like to a text browser.

Can you find the message in there?


  #18  
Old July 30th 08, 07:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default Test

In article ,
"Bruce A. Frank" wrote:

Hmm, I thought HTML *IS* text.


Readability is compromised by the markup in it.

Sort of like trying to read a slightly- to extremely-foreign language,
depending on the degree of pretty-printing, or lack of it, in the text.

-S
  #19  
Old November 8th 08, 06:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Highflyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Test


"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:07:17 GMT, "Bruce A. Frank"
wrote:

!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"
html
Is this post making it through? Having some problems with the program I
use to access RAH./html


reading your message in 'free agent' doesnt work.
the body of the message seems to be some sort of attachment.
I've never been able to read it.
hope you get it fixed.
Stealth Pilot


My program, when I replied to it, asked me if I really wanted to
continue and send it to the newsgroup in HTML since may newsreaders have
problems with HTML text. It recommended I
recast it as text only.

Highflyer
Highflight Aviation Services
Pinckneyville Airport ( PJY )


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mojave Civilian Flight test center accident...Rutan SpaceShip II propellant test explosion. Blueskies Piloting 3 July 27th 07 11:47 PM
Test Firing of the Saturn V S-II S (Second Stage) at the Mississippi Test Facility 6759495.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 12th 07 01:46 AM
Test Firing at Redstone Test Stand 9513303.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 12th 07 01:46 AM
F-1 Engine Test Firing at the S-IB Static Test Stand 9808563.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 9th 07 01:39 PM
F-1 Engine Test Firing at the S-IB Static Test Stand 6335341.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 9th 07 01:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.