If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
QF-14
On Jan 23, 11:36*am, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:00:12 -0600, John Szalay wrote: wrote : I wonder about the Navy sometimes. Capabilities don't seem to matter anymore. They retired the F-14 and still don't have anything that would match an F-14 upgraded to todays standards. The same with the A-6. The Navy still doesn't have one aircraft that would match it's capabilities. Nor do they have the money to maintain what they have..plus get new stuff. The budget reality strikes hard.. going back some years, I remember living on C's for weeks in garrison to help free money for the war in Nam. But then they found enough money to fly all of us over there...the whole damned division, a short time later.... It's goes back even further that that. In 1964 the USMC would run out of money and serve *K (or was it C) rations in the mess hall. This was before the Kaneohe Maraines were sent to Nam. However, it seems the Navy has enough money to keep buying FA-18s. Quantity, not quality. In the Navys defence it does make sense in a way. The F-14 was designed and produced as a fleet defense fighter with the capabilitu of shooting down multiple targets, aircraft and cruise missiles, with the Phoenix missile. With the fall of the Soviet Union they no longer needed that capability. * AEGIS took lead in mass air attack defense. Bears and cruise missiles. At least until China gets wise and builds heavy bombers based inland where to strike would require a major esclatation of the conflict between nuclear powers. Anything they put on/in the water would be fair game. JK JK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|