Simulators

On May 22, 4:44*am, Mxsmanic wrote:

No, you have not. Most "corrections" I see in this group are in fact
expressions of conflicting opinions.

You are NOT a credible source to even comment on flying in the real
world.

Why?? You are not a CGI. You NEVER FLEW in a real plane as PIC.

Therefore your lying AND MISREPRESENTATION will be brought out
front and center.

Sooo, with this behind me, show me where I give conflicting opinions
IN THIS THREAD that stray from the truth of real world flying.

THIS IS A VERY DIRECT REQUEST.

LET ME GUESS YOU CAN'T (or won't) because the above applies.

wrote

Therefore your lying AND MISREPRESENTATION will be brought
out front and center.

Sigh. Why bother. Nothing will change until he is shunned, and totally
ignored. You will get no answers. Nobody with a brain would believe him,
or think he was a pilot for more than a couple posts.
--
Jim in NC

On Sat, 22 May 2010 14:46:57 +0200, Martin Hotze wrote:

Am 17.05.2010 22:46, schrieb :
wrote:
writes:

Nonsense.

Will you PLEASE move your private discussion with MX to email or
elsewhere but RAP?

Thanks!

#m

Not a chance.

Pennino and Liebmann are in this for all the attention they can get.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:03:39 -0400, Morgans wrote:

wrote

Therefore your lying AND MISREPRESENTATION will be brought
out front and center.

Sigh. Why bother. Nothing will change until he is shunned, and totally
ignored. You will get no answers. Nobody with a brain would believe him,
or think he was a pilot for more than a couple posts.

So let me get this straight.

All of you who play this imbecilic post-troll-respond game with this
idiot are idiots?

Ok, carry on.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

For starters, you have no clue how to do flight planning and believe
that all that is required is some abbreviated entries on a FAA flight
plan form.

No. List the specific, factual errors, and correct them. Expressing an opinion
is not correcting an error.

When I asked you if you had ever filled out a flight planning sheet, you
replied that you had not because there would be no one to file it with
anyway.

That means you have no clue that "flight plan" refers to two things:

1. A detailed plan for the flight.

2. An abbreviated summary of the detailed plan filed with the FAA.

All real pilots do number 1 for all flights (other than the obvious such
as practice in the pattern) including VFR flights.

It is one of the first things you learn to do in real pilot training,
part of the written test.

I even posted a link to PDF planning forms typical of what is used, but
you obviously didn't even bother to look at them, and if you did, had no
clue on how to fill one out.

These days most people use a computer based flight planning program and
generate the sheets automattically, but all real pilots know how to fill
one out by hand with pencil, paper, and real charts.

When you are done with number 1, you use that to fill out the FAA flight
plan form to (optionally for VFR) file with the FAA and you put number 1 on
your kneeboard and update it as you fly.

That's what real pilots are REQUIRED to do to meet the requiements of 91.103.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Ari wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 14:46:57 +0200, Martin Hotze wrote:

Am 17.05.2010 22:46, schrieb :
wrote:
writes:

Nonsense.

Will you PLEASE move your private discussion with MX to email or
elsewhere but RAP?

Thanks!

#m

Not a chance.

Pennino and Liebmann are in this for all the attention they can get.

The mentally deranged like MX will not leave a USENET group if ignored,
nor is it practically possible they will be ignored as there will always
be new people who will respond to their drooling delusions.

If anything they will get more determined.

That has been my experience with about 25 years of posting to USENET.

Yeah, about 25 years starting with when it was UUCP transfers over 1200 baud
dial up and there was no "Internet".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 22, 12:01*pm, Ari wrote:

So let me get this straight.

All of you who play this imbecilic post-troll-respond game with this
idiot are idiots?

No, you're the only bonafide idiot here.

---
Mark

writes:

Sooo, with this behind me, show me where I give conflicting opinions
IN THIS THREAD that stray from the truth of real world flying.

Your opinions don't conflict with themselves, as far as I can recall, but they
conflict with mine. A conflict of opinion is not the same as a factual error.

Morgans writes:

Sigh. Why bother. Nothing will change until he is shunned, and totally
ignored. You will get no answers. Nobody with a brain would believe him,
or think he was a pilot for more than a couple posts.

You've been counseling this for years, and yet you have yet to practice it.

writes:

When I asked you if you had ever filled out a flight planning sheet, you
replied that you had not because there would be no one to file it with
anyway.

And there isn't (apart from a basic flight plan for VATSIM flights), for
flight simulation. So there is no error in this.

That means you have no clue that "flight plan" refers to two things:

1. A detailed plan for the flight.

2. An abbreviated summary of the detailed plan filed with the FAA.

I'm aware of both, but the facts above remain correct.

All real pilots do number 1 for all flights (other than the obvious such
as practice in the pattern) including VFR flights.

Not true. Many private pilots are exceedingly casual about flight planning.
This doesn't necessarily lead to accidents, but in many accidents, a lack of
proper planning is a contributing factor.

These days most people use a computer based flight planning program and
generate the sheets automattically, but all real pilots know how to fill
one out by hand with pencil, paper, and real charts.

What they know how to do when tested, and what they do in the real world when
flying, are not always the same things.

That's what real pilots are REQUIRED to do to meet the requiements
of 91.103.

There are a lot of things that private pilots are required to do that some of
them don't actually do in practice. The FAA has no way of enforcing these
requirements unless something happens during a flight.