A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush AWOL Story - New theory comes to light



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old March 26th 04, 04:37 AM
Robey Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, I confessed
the following:

There was a former NSC guy (now living in MN) on local TV in St Paul
tonight (they showed a pic of him and GWB in the Oval Office and two
letters of commendation from Rice and Rumsfeld). This gentleman pretty
much backed Clarke's assertion that Iraq was the primary target
immediately after 9-11.


Allow me to correct myself. I just watched the 10pm news and the guy's
name is Tom Maertens (pronounced Martins) who was NSC Director of
Non-Nuclear Proliferation under Clinton and Bush. The retirement
letters of commendation are signed by Rice and Bush (not Rumsfeld, my
bad... d'oh).

Calls himself a political independent, but is flat out disgusted by
the current administration. He mentioned a Rove memo from 2002 sent to
GOP folks running for elected office (around the country) reminding
them to "run on the war." I hope they do.

Maertens thinks that Richard Clarke "hit a nerve," with GWB.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4684189.html

Juvat
  #42  
Old March 26th 04, 05:07 AM
Josh Halpern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Robey Price wrote:

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Tempest
confessed the following:



He didn't get permission.



OK...busted, I should have posted he had "permission" since apparently
some of his points were acquired in AL. I mean he does have some
points for Oct and Nov 1972, and Rufus G Martin, Maj TX ANG signed off
his points.



His request was denied.



But somehow he was able to get credit for drill periods in Oct and Nov
72 while in AL.



He left TX anyway.



True, but don't make it sound like he had to stay within the borders
of TX. That statement sounds like he was fighting extradition to flee
prosecution for some drug bust...[some will find the irony and or
humor in this...or not]

Please re-read this paragragh I wrote...


This is one of the points that passes belief. I knew a lot of NG people
at that time who simply travelled back to wherever to drill. Sometimes
across most of the country.

josh halpern

  #43  
Old March 26th 04, 05:12 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chad Irby wrote:

In article ,
Tempest wrote:

Let's be real here.


If we were being "real," this whole silly story would have died about
four years back.


You wish, and it's not.

There's a lot of vets who would like to know just where was Bush.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #44  
Old March 26th 04, 05:15 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chad Irby wrote:

In article ,
Tempest wrote:

Chad Irby wrote:

In article ,
Republican Double Standard wrote:

Please. 20 years ago a bunch of criminals set up their own foreign
policy group outside the government and how much jail time did they do?

About the same amount of time a bunch of criminals who discussed
assassinating US Congressmen did.


Kerry voted against it and promptly left the group.


...and didn't tell any law enforcement officers about the conspiracy to
kill members of the US Government.


I heard hundreds of people wanting to kill Clinton, with the means and
opportunity.

What was I supposed to do, call the law every time I heard about it?

Try again.


Don't have to, you admitted that he knew about it.


Under what obligation was Kerry to report it?

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #45  
Old March 26th 04, 05:23 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Robey Price wrote:

Kevin Brooks wrote:

[snip] His own unit had just become an operational
conversion/training unit (first for the F-102, then for both the F-102 and
F-101, and then for the F-101 exclusively for a number of years), and given
the number of higher-hour pilots then leaving the active component, one can
understand why they were not chomping at the bit to retain the flying
services of then 1LT Bush.


Mr Brooks is making a gross error in suggesting that any ANG unit
would bypass one of its "favorite sons" and bring on some unknown
entity, Elmo Bowlogrits leaving active duty. The ANG doesn't work that
way, once you're in...you're IN, no swinging dick active duty guy is
taking your slot, unless you **** up and give them a reason to boot
your ass out.

Yeh the boys at Ellington were making a mission change from Air
Defense to RTU...but the minimum number of hours to qualify for an IP
slot were recommendations in some Commands (ANG) and hard and fast in
others. Hell if he could use political influence to jump ahead of guys
on the waiting list to get in the unit, he could have stayed...he
wasn't forced out by some active duty pogue.

Plus...my employer in 1972, hired just over 40 pilots, in 1973 approx
60 guys, in 1974 less than 20. So there just were not a large number
of guys leaving active duty...meaning not a lot of active duty guys
competing for precious few ANG slots.

It would have been no problem for 1Lt Bush (army types use 1LT, CPT,
MAJ while the Air Force types use 1Lt, Capt, Maj) to raise his hand
and say, "I, GWB wanna fly jets! Just like I said I did when I
interviewed for the slot in 1968," and he pink little body would have
been in IPUG (Instructor Pilot Upgrade).

He just didn't want to fly, going out of state and doing the bare
minimum is proof of that. Flying was not a priority nor a passion for
GWB, he tried it and didn't like it, so he quit. Nobody can dispute
that.

I have co-workers that tell stories of their ANG or Reserve time back
in the good ole days (the 1970s)...when units would use their T-29 to
go pick up guys out of state and bring them in for UTA weekends or
FTPs. Not all units, but some units.

Kind of funny that some folks are still trying to make that dog hunt--this
was a non-issue four years ago, and it remains a non-issue today.


To which Tempest responded:

Maybe to you, but to the swing voters it has legs.

Bush is making his integrity an issue, and this blows a hole right
through it.


GWB loyalists don't see it as an integrity issue. He served the
minimum, and by golly if the minimums weren't good enough, lower the
minimums!

[Brooks waxed sarcastic WRT to Mr Clake...with an E and Tempest
challenged him]

What fabrication? Please provide proof.

You are aware that most everything Clarke has said has been
collaborated, right?


Tempest, sincerely...save your bandwidth.


Noted.

Please don't confuse him with the facts...his mind is made up. That's
really the scary part, some folks are unwilling to entertain ANY doubt
even after no WMD, no al-Qaeda to Iraq connection, no Saddam is an
imminent threat proof. While the swing voters ponder, if Rove & Co
were less than honest on those three things why believe them now.

There was a former NSC guy (now living in MN) on local TV in St Paul
tonight (they showed a pic of him and GWB in the Oval Office and two
letters of commendation from Rice and Rumsfeld). This gentleman pretty
much backed Clarke's assertion that Iraq was the primary target
immediately after 9-11.


Paul O'Neill, former Bush Treasury Secretary, was present in a meeting
just after Bush was inaugurated in January 2001 when Bush came into a
meeting and said, "**** Saddam, we're taking him out."

O'Neill told of the event in his book.

Also, CBS found two other Pentagon officials who collaborated Clarke's
story.
When told of the sources, Hadley stuttered and stumbled to cover up his
shock.

Here's a great place to stay informed
http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/index.htm


Thanks for the link.

Juvat


--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #46  
Old March 26th 04, 05:32 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Kevin Brooks wrote:

"Tempest" wrote in message
...


Kevin Brooks wrote:

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in

message

news
In article ,
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:

by James Ridgeway
A New Theory for Bush's Low, Low Profile in the Alabama Guard
March 24 - 30, 2004 Mondo Washington this week:

Here's a new twist to the George W. Bush AWOL mystery, in which

almost
no one remembers him fulfilling his duties with the Alabama National
Guard. According to an investigation by the Spokane, Washington,
Spokesman-Review, Bush may have been involuntarily removed from

being
a pilot due to little-known Human Reliability Regulations. These

were
rules to screen out military personnel for mental, physical, and
emotional fitness before letting them handle nuclear weapons and
delivery systems. The regulations affected thousands of pilots and
were used to suspend two Washington State pilots on suspicion of

drug
use, although in the end both men received honorable discharges.
snip

The government's reaction to questions about the human reliability
regs merits attention. The White House gave no comment to a
Spokesman-Review reporter, referring questions to the Defense
Department. The National Guard Bureau, now run by a Bush pick from
Texas, said it was under orders not to discuss the story. The

bureau's
chief historian also told the Spokane paper he was under orders not

to
discuss the topic. The freedom of information officer at the bureau
said her people stopped taking requests on Bush's military service
last month and now refer all questions regarding it to the Pentagon.

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0412/mondo2.php


No -- it is a much simpler answer. Since AL ANG was transitioning from
RF-84Fs to RF-4s, they would, naturally, place their most senior

pilots
(Capt's, Maj's, Lt col's, etc) ahead of a lowly short timer Lt (he had
only a short remaining duty obligation) transferring in from Texas.

As I understand it, the RF-4 checkout program was several months long.
The AL ANG simply didn't want to use their resources on him.

Actually, he was only performing split training assemblies with them (or
more accurately, "equivalent training"); his request to transfer to

another
unit had been turned down. His own unit had just become an operational
conversion/training unit (first for the F-102, then for both the F-102

and
F-101, and then for the F-101 exclusively for a number of years), and

given
the number of higher-hour pilots then leaving the active component, one

can
understand why they were not chomping at the bit to retain the flying
services of then 1LT Bush.

Kind of funny that some folks are still trying to make that dog

hunt--this
was a non-issue four years ago, and it remains a non-issue today.


Maybe to you, but to the swing voters it has legs.

Bush is making his integrity an issue, and this blows a hole right
through it.


No, it does not, as it is based upon faulty analysis. PRP would only apply
to nuclear armed units--Bush's unit would not have qualified by 1972 (the
AIM-26A had left the inventory, and his unit was transitioning to a training
role). Them's the facts. You don't like it because they do not play neatly
into your twisted little anti-Bush scenario, and that is just too bad.


What the **** are you talking about?

Just what does that nonsense have to do with Bush leaving his unit
without permission and going AWOL?

Maybe we
will next hear where the esteemed Mr. Clark now recollects the *truth*
behind Bush's service record (well, that is as soon as Clark can

determine
exactly what he wants *that* particular "truth" to look like, based upon

his
evident skills at fabrication).


What fabrication? Please provide proof.


One presumes you possess the modicum of intelligence required to do a web
search; the transcripts of Mr. Clark's background brief (where he offered
views directly contradicting his statements yesterday) given in August 2002
are available at various sites. Likewise, the unredacted portion of the
e-mail that Rice provided contradicting his claims is available. You can
find them if you want to. Why should I bother to provide them to you, as you
won't bother to read what they had to say anyway?


I read them, and you are lying.

If you believe Rice, you're as stupid as you seem.

You are aware that most everything Clarke has said has been
collaborated, right?


Nope.


Yup.

But since it doesn't correspond with your fabricated belief, you won't
acknowledge it.

Mr. Clark's own statements vary depending upon when he said it, who he
said it to, and whether or not his utterance was delivered before or after
he missed getting that job he wanted in DHS.


Clarke explained himself.

And from my own experiences in Washington, he is absolutely correct.

You don't give negative news if it's not asked for.

Mr. Lehman was dead on target when he said Clark has a credibility problem.


Then why did Lehman fall silent and look embarrassed after Clarke
explained himself?

You didn't watch the hearings, did you?

One minute the guy is claiming
he had the guts to stand by his convictions, offer his opinions no matter
how impolitic they were, and tender his resignation, etc.; the next he
whines that his background comments were skewed to be favorable to the Bush
administration because that was just the position he was in. Phooey.


Which is SOP when you work in Washington.

Not that you'd know anything about that.

Brooks

*plonk*


The last act of a lying coward.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #47  
Old March 26th 04, 05:36 AM
Tempest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robey Price wrote:

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Tempest
confessed the following:

He didn't get permission.


OK...busted, I should have posted he had "permission" since apparently
some of his points were acquired in AL. I mean he does have some
points for Oct and Nov 1972, and Rufus G Martin, Maj TX ANG signed off
his points.


He received "permission" after the fact.

The document is posted at www.awolbush.com, it's dated after he was told
to reappear in Texas.

His request was denied.


But somehow he was able to get credit for drill periods in Oct and Nov
72 while in AL.


See above.

He left TX anyway.


True, but don't make it sound like he had to stay within the borders
of TX. That statement sounds like he was fighting extradition to flee
prosecution for some drug bust...[some will find the irony and or
humor in this...or not]


Not my intention.

Please re-read this paragragh I wrote...

The most likely scenario was that GWB put in a little (we're talking
VERY little) "VFR face time," but literally didn't do anything but
walk around unsupervised, drink coffee, have mock dog-fights with his
right hand shooting the watch on his left wrist while telling, "There
I was..." stories.


Juvat


--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748
  #48  
Old March 26th 04, 05:49 AM
Submariner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tempest" wrote in message
...
Robey Price wrote:

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Tempest
confessed the following:

He didn't get permission.


OK...busted, I should have posted he had "permission" since apparently
some of his points were acquired in AL. I mean he does have some
points for Oct and Nov 1972, and Rufus G Martin, Maj TX ANG signed off
his points.


He received "permission" after the fact.

The document is posted at www.awolbush.com, it's dated after he was told
to reappear in Texas.

His request was denied.


But somehow he was able to get credit for drill periods in Oct and Nov
72 while in AL.


See above.

He left TX anyway.


True, but don't make it sound like he had to stay within the borders
of TX. That statement sounds like he was fighting extradition to flee
prosecution for some drug bust...[some will find the irony and or
humor in this...or not]


Not my intention.

Please re-read this paragragh I wrote...

The most likely scenario was that GWB put in a little (we're talking
VERY little) "VFR face time," but literally didn't do anything but
walk around unsupervised, drink coffee, have mock dog-fights with his
right hand shooting the watch on his left wrist while telling, "There
I was..." stories.


Juvat


--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748


This particular angle on the AWOL business makes the most sense to me.

It follows the "too stupid to be..." theme that Dubya has lived by.

Can't you just picture a definitive biography of GWB, with the chapters titled
as following?


Too stupid to be a preppy

Too stupid to be an Eli

Too stupid to be an ANG pilot

Too stupid to be an oil company exec

Too stupid to be a ...

....

...

...

...

Too stupid to be president.







  #49  
Old March 26th 04, 06:05 AM
Robey Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Josh
Halpern confessed the following:


This is one of the points that passes belief. I knew a lot of NG people
at that time who simply travelled back to wherever to drill. Sometimes
across most of the country.


Oh yeah, folks do it all the time. GWB simply didn't want to fly.

Juvat
  #50  
Old March 26th 04, 06:12 AM
Robey Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Tempest
confessed the following:

He received "permission" after the fact.

The document is posted at www.awolbush.com, it's dated after he was told
to reappear in Texas.


Been there, done that...got the PDFs. Please don't mistake my posts as
defending the current occupant of the oval office. I'm not.

True, but don't make it sound like he had to stay within the borders
of TX. That statement sounds like he was fighting extradition to flee
prosecution for some drug bust...[some will find the irony and or
humor in this...or not]


Not my intention.


Dang...and I was hoping you'd see the humor WRT fleeing a drug bust.

Juvat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror PirateJohn Military Aviation 1 September 6th 03 10:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.