If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Lamb wrote
NOW (finally) we might get a better story that the silly superficial questions asked by the news media. How about this Richard: America has returned to manned space launches... and it's not NASA! We rocked around in an RV all night in 40 kt winds the night before and were worried that the launch was going to be scrubbed. But luckily high pressure was over the area and wind died down right before taxi out. My friend Bubba flew Richard Branson in to Mojave in a high dollar three blade helo and then landed him back on the top of the theme restaurant at LAX (he just can't seem to make a low profile entry anywhere!) William Shantner was supposedly there as well as Buzz Aldrin. Most of the event was covered by a local FM station but they screwed it up pretty bad so we just listened to the scanner. The wind was still blowing stiff after t/o on top of our RV so I missed a lot of the air to air conversation, but if anybody wants, I'll try to narrate what I saw in detail. The test pilot community let me in on a little secret: a major control failure occurred during launch and the gyro Rutan used for attitude control tumbled (lost alignment.) This caused an unplanned departure from the vertical profile. Mike M. took over manually and saved the son of a bitch just in time! However, this S-turn maneuver put them over 20 miles off course on the re-entry window! They still made the downwind gear-down position no sweat. I'm surprised they didn't relate this drama to the media (did they?) since it kind of parallels John Glenn's re-entry problems (except this was on launch.) Rutan plans to go into orbit next. Maybe if the media isn't smart enough to know about this it's better; I just don't know. I worried that the shuttle cock had to work perfectly twice in a row and felt like this was a 50/50 operation. Burt had told an engineer who works for him when the project began: "The problem with NASA is that they're not killing enough astronauts." Burt is a genius in my mind because he is willing to hang it way out there and try things no one else would dare. For example: the attitude control system when the vehicle is out of the atmosphere is just compressed air! What would happen if a little moisture froze up the attitude air valves? The whole thing was a complete cliff hanger! It is equivalent in my mind to watching the Mayflower disappear over the horizon bound for the new world. I'll never forget it. pacplyer |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Felger Carbon" wrote in message hlink.net...
"B2431" wrote in message ... I think one of the tidiest actions was when the pilot left the aircraft just a few minutes after landing unlike 20 minutes or so while the space shuttle is purged of poisonous gasses. Uh, waiting for the hull temperature to cool down so the crew doesn't get burned while egressing? ;-) I don't see where jeers at the space program have anything to do with this performance. Not trying to take anything away from the crew but this is a long way from being able to do the same thing as the shuttle. For one, they have a long way to go if the goal is to achieve orbit (I don't think it is). For two, their method of re-entry will never work if returning from orbit. An admirable achievement nonetheless. Harry K |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
In article , FlyGuy says...
Chuck! You are just not being fair to Zoom. After all, he is probably the most qualified person to be in the chase plane. Remember, he *is* a graduate of the Test Pilot School! This could come in handy, should there be any re-entry problems, where they need Jim to "talk the pilot back to earth". Besides, this is a risky flight, and if there were any medical problems, Jim's extensive medical background could come in handy too. Thank God he was there to let mission control know they suffered some damage on the fuselage. ROFL!! good thing I wasn't drinking coffee when I read that. I guess your right I wasn't thinking :-) They probably read his bio on one of his book covers and wondered "where has this guy been hiding for so long?" I bet they got him for a song. Actually I bet he was such a pest and nag the let him do it just to get some peace and quiet. Yup ,engineer,designer,skilled parachutist, medical Doctor,writer ,author, publisher, test pilot,savior of Bob Hoover ,Savior of aviation, savior of the Etheopians, flight instructor,air show performer, critic and self proclaimed conscience of homebuilt aviation. WOW what a guy and no wonder he got to go.LOL!!! He's still a phony , now he's a phony who got a ride in a Beech Star ship and took some pictures. He'll be bragging about this for a long time. I'd sure like to know the rest of the story. Wonder if he'll be on th next one or if he wore out his welcome when he started to tell his tall tails??? Sheesh of all the photographers they got zoom. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "credibility it about credibility and he still has none" chuck s |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
pacplyer wrote:
The whole thing was a complete cliff hanger! It is equivalent in my mind to watching the Mayflower disappear over the horizon bound for the new world. I'll never forget it. pacplyer Amen, Pacman. I only got to watch on CNN, but I was on the edge of my seat, even during the commercials. A few weeks ago, bored outta what's left of my mind, I picked up a few library books on the early space program. I had read all the hero stuff years back. "The Right Stuff" and "Apollo 13" tended to emphasize the glory with precious little hard technical details. But "Lost Moon", Lovell's side of the Apollo 13 story, and most especially Gene Krantz's "Failure is Not an Option" gets right into the nuts and bolts of those early days. They better describe not just what happened, but why and how it happened. It's down right scary how critical the most minor details are when entering a new environment that is as hostile as space. Your comment about a how a little moisture in an air tank could freeze up a valve, potentially causing the complete loss of the vehicle was very much to the point. Remember the old adage? "Aviation is not, of itself, inherently dangerous. But to a greater extent than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity, or neglect". For space flight, I'd bump that up an order of magnitude (or two?). Gus Grissom is quoted saying, "If we die we want people to accept it. We hope that if anything happens to us it will not delay the program. The conquest of space is worth the risk of life". And he did. In the aftermath of the Apollo 1 fire, NASA took a year (and $75 mil) to redesign the space craft, mature their mental attitudes, and yes, did come back with a much safer vehicle. Quite obviously, this was the beginning of the "failure is not an option" mentality that took us to the moon and back successfully. I doubt that public attitude (as shaped by the press) would have allowed for another disaster of that magnitude during the moon race. But if Burt were to be lost (Heaven forbid, Please!), end of story. Richard |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Sheesh of all the photographers they got zoom. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "credibility it about credibility and he still has none" chuck s ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ You would have preferred Juan, the jet jock itch? Barnyard BOb - |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , FlyGuy says... Chuck! You are just not being fair to Zoom. After all, he is probably the most qualified person to be in the chase plane. Remember, he *is* a graduate of the Test Pilot School! This could come in handy, should there be any re-entry problems, where they need Jim to "talk the pilot back to earth". Besides, this is a risky flight, and if there were any medical problems, Jim's extensive medical background could come in handy too. Thank God he was there to let mission control know they suffered some damage on the fuselage. ROFL!! good thing I wasn't drinking coffee when I read that. I guess your right I wasn't thinking :-) They probably read his bio on one of his book covers and wondered "where has this guy been hiding for so long?" I bet they got him for a song. Actually I bet he was such a pest and nag the let him do it just to get some peace and quiet. Yup ,engineer,designer,skilled parachutist, medical Doctor,writer ,author, publisher, test pilot,savior of Bob Hoover ,Savior of aviation, savior of the Etheopians, flight instructor,air show performer, critic and self proclaimed conscience of homebuilt aviation. WOW what a guy and no wonder he got to go.LOL!!! He's still a phony , now he's a phony who got a ride in a Beech Star ship and took some pictures. He'll be bragging about this for a long time. I'd sure like to know the rest of the story. Wonder if he'll be on th next one or if he wore out his welcome when he started to tell his tall tails??? Sheesh of all the photographers they got zoom. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "credibility it about credibility and he still has none" chuck s After many years of reading here, I've learned to put the coffee down before reading the next post. 'Cause you just never know... Richard |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Did Dennis Fetters take any shots of SS1? Sorry, couldnt resist take care Blll |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
BllFs6 wrote: Did Dennis Fetters take any shots of SS1? Sorry, couldnt resist take care Blll What's the matter with you? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
atmosphere and glided down to a safe landing
in the California desert [40 years] to the successful flight of the first private one. If the same timescale was used for conventional airplanes, the first privately-owned aircraft would have flown in 1943. The first private aircraft flew in 1903. The first *government8 a/c flew iirc 10 years after that. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Wanttaja wrote in message . ..
It took about forty years from the date the first government-sponsored manned aerospacecraft left the atmosphere and glided down to a safe landing in the California desert to the successful flight of the first private one. If the same timescale was used for conventional airplanes, the first privately-owned aircraft would have flown in 1943. As opposed to 1903? The first airplane WAS privately-owned. Not to mention amateur-built. The government-funded program wound up in the Potomac. ;-) Re preflight envy, keep in mind that a lot of those military and commerical pilots also fly Cessnas, Kitfoxes, ULs... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |