If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
finally resolved Kern County tax problem
As some of you may recall, although my glider has been at Minden for
years (and I pay taxes there), a few months ago I got a tax bill from Kern County (KC). The supposed aircraft location was the Cal City airport. After a few phone calls I determined that the bill was based on a casual conversation I had with the Douglas County (DC) Assessor (Ann) last fall, indicating that I *might* use Cal City in the future. The upshot was that she finked on me to KC, who dutifully issued me a bill ($330/year in KC vs $78/year in DC). This was in spite of the fact that the glider is not at Cal City, has never been at Cal City, much less KC. No evidence existed to claim that my glider has ever been seen at Cal City. DC is conservative enough to only issue bills based upon actual sightings. I've lost track of how many phone calls I've made to both Assessors, trying to straighten this out. While DC was apologetic, KC was downright snippy when I suggested that I didn't actually owe them any money. Their argument was that since they'd *heard* that I was going to base my glider at Cal City, then it was MY problem to convince them to their satisfaction that I was paying taxes somewhere else. That is, if I couldn't prove that I was paying taxes *somewhere*, then I had to pay KC. They were unable to cite a statute in support of their position, and were clearly irked when I asked for the relevant code. Only a personal phone call from the DC Assessor to the KC Assessor caused KC to drop their demand. The only reason I pursued it is because I reasoned it would be less work to keep KC from putting a bogus lein on my glider, than it would be to get a bogus lein (plus penalties) removed. Grrrrrr. Ken |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As an ex-Californian, now Nevadan, I can say that the tax folks in CA are .
.. . okay, I can't sum it up in just one word . . . ravenous, piranha-like, suspicious, voracious, mean spirited, and worse). I smile when I write the check to Douglas County. In CA, the assessor bumped the value of my Mooney up every year, then added sales tax to the appraised value and taxed me for the total. In NV, they depreciate the aircraft each year. When the tax gets down to $75, you don't have to pay it anymore. Oh, and the soaring is pretty good here at Minden too! bumper "ken ward" wrote in message ... As some of you may recall, although my glider has been at Minden for years (and I pay taxes there), a few months ago I got a tax bill from Kern County (KC). The supposed aircraft location was the Cal City airport. After a few phone calls I determined that the bill was based on a casual conversation I had with the Douglas County (DC) Assessor (Ann) last fall, indicating that I *might* use Cal City in the future. The upshot was that she finked on me to KC, who dutifully issued me a bill ($330/year in KC vs $78/year in DC). This was in spite of the fact that the glider is not at Cal City, has never been at Cal City, much less KC. No evidence existed to claim that my glider has ever been seen at Cal City. DC is conservative enough to only issue bills based upon actual sightings. I've lost track of how many phone calls I've made to both Assessors, trying to straighten this out. While DC was apologetic, KC was downright snippy when I suggested that I didn't actually owe them any money. Their argument was that since they'd *heard* that I was going to base my glider at Cal City, then it was MY problem to convince them to their satisfaction that I was paying taxes somewhere else. That is, if I couldn't prove that I was paying taxes *somewhere*, then I had to pay KC. They were unable to cite a statute in support of their position, and were clearly irked when I asked for the relevant code. Only a personal phone call from the DC Assessor to the KC Assessor caused KC to drop their demand. The only reason I pursued it is because I reasoned it would be less work to keep KC from putting a bogus lein on my glider, than it would be to get a bogus lein (plus penalties) removed. Grrrrrr. Ken |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Bumper, where can I find out about not paying once
the tax is below 75 dollars. I just paid mine and it was below this. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Your story doesn't suprise me in the least. I have fought Kern County
for return of my overpaid by a bunch child support for Years. This week I get 3 different checks in the mail from them, all for different amounts, and the lot of them don't add up to the overage..... I guess I should feel lucky for recieving SOMETHING, but maaaaan what a bunch of crap to deal with.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Owning | 77 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
2003 Kern County Airshow (Ridgecrest, Ca) SNOWBIRD PICS now up | Wings Of Fury Aviation Photography | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 03 11:05 PM |
2003 Kern County (Ridgecrest, Ca) Airshow Gallery (SNOWBIRD PICS) | Wings Of Fury Aviation Photography | Military Aviation | 0 | October 16th 03 11:02 PM |
2003 Kern County (Ridgecrest, Calif) Airshow Gallery - SNOWBIRD PICS NOW UP!!! | Wings Of Fury Aviation Photography | Aerobatics | 0 | October 16th 03 11:01 PM |