A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Could the Press Grow a Spine?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23rd 04, 09:27 AM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Could the Press Grow a Spine?

Well I watched "Hardball" last night with Campbell Brown.

She had Bartlett, one of the Bushies on. She asked him a question. He talked
for a while and she said something like, "you are very articulate, but that
avoids the question completely." I wish more of the Press would point out that
the vast majority of the questions asked are just totally avoided on both
sides.

She also showed two clips back to back of VP Cheney caught in a big lie about
Atta's supposed meeting with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. In the one clip,
Cheney said it was "confirmed" that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence. About a
year later he said he never said that.

Running the clips back to back showed that he just lied. Bartlett hemmed and
hawed about that and said the question was still open, but Cheney's words
definitively said it was NOT open -- it was CONFIRMED (in case anyone missed it
the first time) that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

These ******* Republicans have got to go.

Walt


  #2  
Old June 23rd 04, 01:09 PM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WalterM140 wrote:
Well I watched "Hardball" last night with Campbell Brown.

She had Bartlett, one of the Bushies on. She asked him a question. He talked
for a while and she said something like, "you are very articulate, but that
avoids the question completely." I wish more of the Press would point out that
the vast majority of the questions asked are just totally avoided on both
sides.

She also showed two clips back to back of VP Cheney caught in a big lie about
Atta's supposed meeting with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. In the one clip,
Cheney said it was "confirmed" that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence. About a
year later he said he never said that.

Running the clips back to back showed that he just lied. Bartlett hemmed and
hawed about that and said the question was still open, but Cheney's words
definitively said it was NOT open -- it was CONFIRMED (in case anyone missed
it the first time) that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

These ******* Republicans have got to go.


Let's face it, Walt, lying is what they do best....and accusing their opponents
of lying is what they do second best. It seems to be the nature of the beastie.

George Z.

Walt



  #3  
Old June 23rd 04, 03:00 PM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
WalterM140 wrote:
Well I watched "Hardball" last night with Campbell Brown.

She had Bartlett, one of the Bushies on. She asked him a question. He

talked
for a while and she said something like, "you are very articulate, but

that
avoids the question completely." I wish more of the Press would point

out that
the vast majority of the questions asked are just totally avoided on

both
sides.

She also showed two clips back to back of VP Cheney caught in a big lie

about
Atta's supposed meeting with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. In the one

clip,
Cheney said it was "confirmed" that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

About a
year later he said he never said that.

Running the clips back to back showed that he just lied. Bartlett hemmed

and
hawed about that and said the question was still open, but Cheney's

words
definitively said it was NOT open -- it was CONFIRMED (in case anyone

missed
it the first time) that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

These ******* Republicans have got to go.


Let's face it, Walt, lying is what they do best....and accusing their

opponents
of lying is what they do second best. It seems to be the nature of the

beastie.


They can't count very well, either! :-)



  #4  
Old June 23rd 04, 08:00 PM
Leslie Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The good news is most of you radical assholes, being anti-RKBA, will roll up
pretty quickly.

Steve Swartz


"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
WalterM140 wrote:
Well I watched "Hardball" last night with Campbell Brown.

She had Bartlett, one of the Bushies on. She asked him a question. He

talked
for a while and she said something like, "you are very articulate, but

that
avoids the question completely." I wish more of the Press would point

out that
the vast majority of the questions asked are just totally avoided on

both
sides.

She also showed two clips back to back of VP Cheney caught in a big lie

about
Atta's supposed meeting with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. In the one

clip,
Cheney said it was "confirmed" that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

About a
year later he said he never said that.

Running the clips back to back showed that he just lied. Bartlett hemmed

and
hawed about that and said the question was still open, but Cheney's

words
definitively said it was NOT open -- it was CONFIRMED (in case anyone

missed
it the first time) that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence.

These ******* Republicans have got to go.


Let's face it, Walt, lying is what they do best....and accusing their

opponents
of lying is what they do second best. It seems to be the nature of the

beastie.

George Z.

Walt





  #7  
Old June 24th 04, 05:58 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Could the Press Grow a Spine?
From: Ed Rasimus
Date: 6/24/2004 7:53 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 24 Jun 2004 14:17:03 GMT,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Could the Press Grow a Spine?
From: "Leslie Swartz"

Date: 6/23/2004 12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

The good news is most of you radical assholes, being anti-RKBA, will roll

up
pretty quickly.

Steve Swartz


Do you have more than three Purple Hearts and a Silver Star?


Arthur Kramer


Actually, Art, you shouldn't be using Purple Hearts as a measure of
valor. They demonstrate either bad luck, or if garnered in groups, a
level of combat incompetence.

I've got an SSM and five DFC's, but no PH. I'd rather win than lose.
I'd rather America prevail than the Islamic fundamentalists. I'd
rather retain national sovereignty than subject us to the whims of the
UN. I'd rather carry my own weapon and defend myself. I'd rather
individual responsibility than a welfare state. I'd rather keep my
earnings and make my own spending choices. I'd like higher standards
rather than affirmative action.

Any questions?


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8



There are those who will do nothing for anyone under any circumstances
regardless of need. Then there are those who are more concerned and helpful to
those in need. Your mileage may vary. There is nothing heroic about greed.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #8  
Old June 24th 04, 10:46 PM
Paul J. Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Ed Rasimus
writes
On 24 Jun 2004 14:17:03 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote:
Do you have more than three Purple Hearts and a Silver Star?


Actually, Art, you shouldn't be using Purple Hearts as a measure of
valor. They demonstrate either bad luck, or if garnered in groups, a
level of combat incompetence.


I'd call them good luck myself, but then my (limited) experience was
infantry where *we* were the targets. (This isn't meant to denigrate
groups like armour and aviation: just because the enemy is targeting
your platform rather than you personally; doesn't make you safer,
because the overmatch in weapons involved and for aircraft the problem
of a long fall to follow, tends to produce much more an "escaped unhurt
/ killed with no chute" dichotomy)

I've got an SSM and five DFC's, but no PH. I'd rather win than lose.
I'd rather America prevail than the Islamic fundamentalists. I'd
rather retain national sovereignty than subject us to the whims of the
UN. I'd rather carry my own weapon and defend myself. I'd rather
individual responsibility than a welfare state. I'd rather keep my
earnings and make my own spending choices. I'd like higher standards
rather than affirmative action.

Any questions?


Yes, but they're quibbles rather than arguments. I'd argue details of
many of those statements while agreeing with them overall.

--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk
  #9  
Old June 24th 04, 11:28 PM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've got an SSM and five DFC's, but no PH.

George Bush has neither SSM, DFC or PH.

In fact, his chronolgical record of service has a 16 month gap.

-He- has no right to denigrate the service of a highly decorated WIA veteran
like Senator Kerry, or to have his surrogates do it.

Walt
  #10  
Old June 27th 04, 03:28 AM
tscottme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...


Actually, Art, you shouldn't be using Purple Hearts as a measure of
valor. They demonstrate either bad luck, or if garnered in groups, a
level of combat incompetence.

I've got an SSM and five DFC's, but no PH. I'd rather win than lose.
I'd rather America prevail than the Islamic fundamentalists. I'd
rather retain national sovereignty than subject us to the whims of the
UN. I'd rather carry my own weapon and defend myself. I'd rather
individual responsibility than a welfare state. I'd rather keep my
earnings and make my own spending choices. I'd like higher standards
rather than affirmative action.

Any questions?


Ed Rasimus


Yeah will you buy Art's Viagra, it's just not fair that he has to pay for it
himself.

--
Scott

Imagine how the war would be different if the liberals were giving aid and
comfort to America.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 31st 04 03:55 AM
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 11th 03 11:58 PM
04 Oct 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 4th 03 07:51 PM
FS: Aviation History Books Neil Cournoyer Military Aviation 0 August 26th 03 08:32 PM
07 Aug 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 8th 03 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.