A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1979 Tiger for Sale



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old August 30th 03, 11:15 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AND I took off after an Arrow, slowly but surely caught him and
pulled away.....


Ain't it fun? (Of course, I'm burning a bit more fuel than you in order to
do it...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #52  
Old September 10th 03, 07:29 AM
Flynn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

"Roger Tracy" wrote in message
.. .
Not for something I'd want. It seems like every time I read an article

about
some older plane, they have really low values they're quoting. It's like
they
went and dug out their 5 - 10 yr old copy of Aviation Consumer.

What's the point if you find a bargain price and have to pay $20k to get

it
up to snuff?

"Mike Noel" wrote in message
...
Does anyone here think that $49,500 is
a realistic price?







  #53  
Old September 10th 03, 12:12 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.


What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #54  
Old September 10th 03, 12:44 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Luke" writes:

"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.


What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!


And I was going to offer to haul it away to my home airfield for free,
as a favour, of course, to save the expense of a wrecker.


All the best,


David
  #55  
Old September 10th 03, 02:24 PM
Flynn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Proof-positive that God still works miracles!!!

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.


What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM




  #56  
Old September 10th 03, 02:24 PM
Captain Wubba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I couldn't tell if you were trolling or just stunningly misinformed
and inexperienced. Seeing in another post that you have 110 hours, I'm
going to assume the latter. Your statement abot 'newer is better -
period' is just plain silly. I can show you a late 60s Cessna 182 at
my home airport that will put any new 182 to shame. 100 hour engine,
beautiful paint, great avionics, stunning leather interior. All for
less than 1/2 the cost of a similarly equipped 'new' 182. The owner
bought a 'normal' 182 (with shaky P&I) and had it fixed up *exactly*
the way he wanted it. Since he paid a fraction of the cost of new, he
could afford to have it done his way. Ask any A&P (or even any pilot
with more than 110 hours) and ask them how important airframe age is.
They'll tell you 'not very'. A properly maintained non-pressurized
small plane can fly indefinitely...go do some research in the NTSB
database, you will find *very* few accidents relating to airframe age.

I'd take this 'old' Cessna over a new 182 any day. What exactly can
you do with a new 182 that I couldn't do with this older one, that
cost less than 1/2 the price? Hull insurance is lower, so I save money
on an ongoing basis. On a common, simple plane like a 182 (or even a
not-so common plane like my 1963 Beech Musketeer) maintenence and
parts are not significantly greater in cost than for a much newer
plane. Bournelli's law applies equally to 1963 and 2003 airplanes, so
they both can get the job of flying done. So what? What *exactly*
makes the 2003 plane better?


Cap

"Satellite" wrote in message om...
I don't get into an older than 20 year plane!
And what are you telling me here?
Are you trying to do some loops and steep turns?
Any plane racing in your future?
Handling better - for what?
Newer is better - PERIOD.


"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
.net...
Fly a Tiger and then come back and tell me it handles like a Cessna.


"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back:
How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that.
Your plane is an old pile of junk.
Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172!
They are available from $75000 and up...
Look for yourself www.aso.com
And you get recent avionics, lower time,
nice paint, nice interior, lower insurance,
ad a new engine and you are set...
Your plane... $76000...Ha, what a joke...


"Flynn" wrote in message
news:YpN1b.235442$o%2.106915@sccrnsc02...
Well I've taken the new plane plunge and put a deposit down on a new

SR22
for delivery in late Sept. My wife says I can't have 2 airplanes so

the
Tiger's for sale.

Latest info is at
http://www.ipilot.com/classifieds/ad...&cid=-1&fuid=0
I'm going to take some new pic's today and post them there. Contact

info
if
interested is also at the above site.

Patrick Flynn
Sammamish, WA
79 Tiger N4543A KRNT








  #57  
Old September 10th 03, 02:41 PM
Satellite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.


What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM





  #58  
Old September 10th 03, 03:15 PM
Flynn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Uh....who said anything about selling it for $49,500? Go back to sleep.

"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.


What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM







  #59  
Old September 10th 03, 03:57 PM
Juan E Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Congratulations!!!!

"Flynn" wrote in message
t...
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.



  #60  
Old September 10th 03, 04:35 PM
Satellite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, there are more idiots than I thought.

"Flynn" wrote in message
news:HlG7b.307842$Oz4.99744@rwcrnsc54...
Uh....who said anything about selling it for $49,500? Go back to sleep.

"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM










 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New WWII movies coming! The Enlightenment Military Aviation 28 September 12th 04 02:11 AM
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition out-of-print Book J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 March 21st 04 06:41 AM
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition out-of-print Book J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 December 1st 03 06:07 AM
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition out-of-print Book J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 October 26th 03 05:35 AM
1979 Tiger for Sale Flynn Aviation Marketplace 65 September 11th 03 08:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.