If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Alejandro Magno" wrote in message om... "John Carrier" wrote in message ... Commets ? Hardly a fair comparison ... Su product demo versus YF flight mishap. Maneuverability is not the panacea it might appear. 180 degree heading reversals in a phone booth certainly impress, but the aircraft is an inviting target while performing them. It might be interesting to see a 1v1, guns only engagement between the two aircraft, but it'd be irrelevant. Other aerodynamic factors ... speed, range, run-out capability, endurance ... are more significant. Tactics (how you employ the aircraft) are important. And the final argument is weapons system performance. There are numerous examples of less-maneuverable aircraft gaining superiority over their better turning adversaries. But I bet the Su is a kick in the ass to fly! R / John References of Su-37: Feredarion of American Scientists http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/su-37.htm USNews: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politic...perflanker.htm Sukhoi's Chief Designer http://tomcat.fnet.cz/su37_popis.htm Global Security http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ssia/su-37.htm A plane lover: http://www.geocities.com/fighterplanelover/su37.html Magno Magno. The Su-37, bort 711, crashed in Dec 2002. It had already been returned back to Su-35 before its demise. TJ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
John Mullen wrote
Scott Ferrin wrote: You're not violating any policies per say (I'm not even sure there are any except basic courtesy) but when one rambles on about the supposed superiority of a country, airplane, whatever with the express intent of ****ing people off it doesn't go over real well and it's not long before people stop taking you seriously and see you as nothing more than an annoyance. If you think the Su-37 is superior to the F-22 then great. Tell us why and if it's just your opinion or actually based on facts. The fact that you started off with a video of an F-22 prototype crashing while the Flanker does a couple flips suggests all you wanted to do is slam the F-22. That being the case there are people here that would be more than happy to slam you right back but in the end you'll simply be ignored. If you feel like the US is overrated then fine. You're entitled to your own opinion. Really? Hey, that's very generous of you! John There is no censorship in this forum. More about censorshiop he http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...+la+democracia Magno |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Ferrin wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:24:02 +0000, John Mullen wrote: Scott Ferrin wrote: On 4 Jan 2004 02:02:26 -0800, (Alejandro Magno) wrote: Scott Ferrin wrote That video of the B-52 crashing is a pretty scarey one. BTW is there some reason you feel the need to dog the US rather than to try to remain somewhat objective? I looked at your other post and it seems like you are more interested in attempting to prove something than in genuinely exchanging thoughts and information. If I'm wrong please correct me. I hope I am not violating the policies of this group. Sometimes I think that the USA is overrated. Magno You're not violating any policies per say (I'm not even sure there are any except basic courtesy) but when one rambles on about the supposed superiority of a country, airplane, whatever with the express intent of ****ing people off it doesn't go over real well and it's not long before people stop taking you seriously and see you as nothing more than an annoyance. If you think the Su-37 is superior to the F-22 then great. Tell us why and if it's just your opinion or actually based on facts. The fact that you started off with a video of an F-22 prototype crashing while the Flanker does a couple flips suggests all you wanted to do is slam the F-22. That being the case there are people here that would be more than happy to slam you right back but in the end you'll simply be ignored. If you feel like the US is overrated then fine. You're entitled to your own opinion. Really? Hey, that's very generous of you! John Way to chip in from the nosebleed seats. I've read this backwards forwards and sideways and it just doesn't mean anything to me. What were you trying to express by your post? (Talk about two cultures divided by a common language!) John |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
You're not violating any policies per say (I'm not even sure there are any except basic courtesy) but when one rambles on about the supposed superiority of a country, airplane, whatever with the express intent of ****ing people off it doesn't go over real well and it's not long before people stop taking you seriously and see you as nothing more than an annoyance. If you think the Su-37 is superior to the F-22 then great. Tell us why and if it's just your opinion or actually based on facts. The fact that you started off with a video of an F-22 prototype crashing while the Flanker does a couple flips suggests all you wanted to do is slam the F-22. That being the case there are people here that would be more than happy to slam you right back but in the end you'll simply be ignored. If you feel like the US is overrated then fine. You're entitled to your own opinion. Really? Hey, that's very generous of you! John Way to chip in from the nosebleed seats. I've read this backwards forwards and sideways and it just doesn't mean anything to me. What were you trying to express by your post? If you really don't understand it I'll explain it. Your comment about me being generous by saying he's entitled to his own opinion when I was just trying to help out a newbie sounds like sarcasm. It sounds like you're saying I'm bestowing the right to have an opinion on him like I think I have some kind of authority to do so. That wasn't my intent at all as anybody could read in my post. So your comment comes across like an insult so I insulted you back. Nosebleed seats are those WAY the hell up in the rafters in a stadium. At a Jazz/Bulls game when they were playing for the NBA Championship I could damn near stand up and hang from the rafters of the Delta Center. Anyway "nosebleed" implies you're up so high that you risk a nosebleed from the thinner air up there (don't even know if that's true but whoever said sayings need to be true). Anyway (I'm getting there) I'm saying that your comment was like one of those people up in the rafters screaming down at the refs for a bad call like they think that they know better than everybody else, and that their opinion matters or is even heard. If you were just joking about how sometimes here on the newsgroups people get screamed at merely for voicing their opinon (who hasn't experienced that) then I apologize for the insult. (Talk about two cultures divided by a common language!) John |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Ferrin wrote in message . ..
You're not violating any policies per say (I'm not even sure there are any except basic courtesy) but when one rambles on about the supposed superiority of a country, airplane, whatever with the express intent of ****ing people off it doesn't go over real well and it's not long before people stop taking you seriously and see you as nothing more than an annoyance. If you think the Su-37 is superior to the F-22 then great. Tell us why and if it's just your opinion or actually based on facts. The fact that you started off with a video of an F-22 prototype crashing while the Flanker does a couple flips suggests all you wanted to do is slam the F-22. That being the case there are people here that would be more than happy to slam you right back but in the end you'll simply be ignored. If you feel like the US is overrated then fine. You're entitled to your own opinion. Really? Hey, that's very generous of you! John Way to chip in from the nosebleed seats. I've read this backwards forwards and sideways and it just doesn't mean anything to me. What were you trying to express by your post? If you really don't understand it I'll explain it. Your comment about me being generous by saying he's entitled to his own opinion when I was just trying to help out a newbie sounds like sarcasm. It sounds like you're saying I'm bestowing the right to have an opinion on him like I think I have some kind of authority to do so. That wasn't my intent at all as anybody could read in my post. So your comment comes across like an insult so I insulted you back. Nosebleed seats are those WAY the hell up in the rafters in a stadium. At a Jazz/Bulls game when they were playing for the NBA Championship I could damn near stand up and hang from the rafters of the Delta Center. Anyway "nosebleed" implies you're up so high that you risk a nosebleed from the thinner air up there (don't even know if that's true but whoever said sayings need to be true). Anyway (I'm getting there) I'm saying that your comment was like one of those people up in the rafters screaming down at the refs for a bad call like they think that they know better than everybody else, and that their opinion matters or is even heard. If you were just joking about how sometimes here on the newsgroups people get screamed at merely for voicing their opinon (who hasn't experienced that) then I apologize for the insult. If you worry about me, take it easy. I did not read any insults. So, apology not taken because there is no reason to apologize. Nothing. I think you were very respectful. I showed an American plane crashing, you showed a Russian plane crashing. Planes crash every once in a while. Sometimes, sarcasm can make a conversation a little more interesting. You and I are even. In the case you had ridiculized many more Russian planes I would feel sad but I would not engage in a personal attack for that. If you show pictures or movies of planes, you are just showing evidence, not opinions. No reason to take that as a personal attack, maybe with some sarcasm. You can see in the other thread "Russian Military Technology" how people got personal with me since the beginning, every argument I gave they made fun of me. Then, I fought back and really ridiculized them, I lost my control. But, you know, you go and read the thread. You can clearly see who started the personal attacks. Those people do not know that I have this condition: http://www.ocfoundation.org/ I lost my control, but they lost the respect for me, first. There was one guy named Keith Willshaw ) who first said this: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:....demon.co .uk -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Keith Willshaw ) Subject: Russian Military Technology View: Complete Thread (63 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian, rec.aviation.military, sci.military.naval Date: 2004-01-06 10:54:12 PST "Alejandro Magno" wrote in message m... "Ragnar" wrote in message ... I would note that Kursk was fought by the SOVIETS, not the Russians. Thanks, I did not know that there were not Russians in the Soviet Army. You are a fool. The Soviet Army included Georgians, Armenians, Ukranians, ByeloRussians, Uzbeks, Kazajhs etc. etc. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ As you can see Mr Keith Willshaw does not know how to read. I never said that there were only Russians in the Soviet army. I read better than him, and English is not my first language. Maybe he does not know what logic is. Then he says: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:....aspentech.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Keith Willshaw ) Subject: Russian Military Technology View: Complete Thread (186 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military Date: 2004-01-06 01:34:59 PST "Alejandro Magno" wrote in message om... (B2431) wrote Aha, magno shows his true colours. Now tell us ALL about ZOG and the great international Zionist conspiracies. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired A CATACLYSM The Russians already started to roll the ball: http://www.lebensraum.org/english/zg...06/990614.html The sound of their brave singing is heard! We are coming, brave comrades! Your White Aryan brothers in England, Greece, Sweden, Nigeria, Iceland, America, South Africa, Italy, France, Denmark, Argentina, Chile, Mother Russia, Scandinavia, Brazil, Canada, Serbia -- EVERYWHERE -- hear you! We are COMING! MARCHING! FIGHTING! The Great Day of JUSTICE DRAWS NIGH! I hate to tell you this old boy but Nigerians and the majority of South Africans and Brazilians are not white. ISTR that the Russians were regarded by the Aryan master race as sub human Slavs so I suspect you just failed your entrance exam for the SS You are one of the most entertaining loons we have seen for some time, please keep posting. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ He asks me to keep posting, because he enjoys what I write. I hope he enjoys it, and I hope he understands what he reads because we already know that he does not know how to read. He has comprehension problems. Then, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0%2540n ews.d mon.co.uk%26rnum%3D2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Keith Willshaw ) Subject: Russian Military Technology View: Complete Thread (186 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military Date: 2004-01-06 11:32:08 PST "Jarg" wrote in message .. . This is way out of line. You should be ashamed of yourself. And you are undoubtedly in violation of your ISP agreement. Jarg He appears to be posting from Mexico via Telmex nic-hdl: SRU person: SEGURIDAD DE RED UNINET e-mail: address: PERIFERICO SUR, 3190, ALVARO OBREG address: 01900 - MEXICO - DF country: MX I believe that country passed legislation in 2003 making anti-semitic behaviour unlawful Personally i simply intend to add his name to my killfile. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ First, he enjoys my posts, then he says he is going to put me in his killfile. Once more, I prove that Mr. Keith Willshaw does not know how to read. Or, maybe, his computer has hacked, and different people made the 3 posts I am showing. If Mr. Keith Willshaw wrote the 3 posts, the conclusion is that his eyes are not connected to his brain, because he does not know how to read. Or maybe his hands are not connected to his brain and he does not know how to express himself by written methods. Maybe he is on medication, too. I called the fact of using killfiles the technique of the ostriches. I think this is self-explanatory: http://www.windmillsprogramme.com/im...ls/ostrich.jpg http://www.pecos.net/news/images/ostrich.gif http://www.carruthillustrative.com/images/ostcvr.jpg http://www.learnersonline.com/weekly...2/2k0611_4.gif http://www.freedomministries.org.uk/images/Image19.gif I apologize if my comments about Mr Keith "the ostrich" Willshaw bother you. Magnus |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
If you were just joking about how sometimes here on the newsgroups people get screamed at merely for voicing their opinon (who hasn't experienced that) then I apologize for the insult. If you worry about me, take it easy. I did not read any insults. So, apology not taken because there is no reason to apologize. Nothing. I think you got things mixed up. I was replying to the guy directly above. I think you were very respectful. I showed an American plane crashing, you showed a Russian plane crashing. Planes crash every once in a while. Sometimes, sarcasm can make a conversation a little more interesting. Yeah, I almost posted that one where the Su-27 took out the crowd but that would have been in REALLY bad taste. You and I are even. In the case you had ridiculized many more Russian planes I would feel sad but I would not engage in a personal attack for that. If you show pictures or movies of planes, you are just showing evidence, not opinions. No reason to take that as a personal attack, maybe with some sarcasm. I never took anything as a personal attack. You can see in the other thread "Russian Military Technology" how people got personal with me since the beginning, every argument I gave they made fun of me. Then, I fought back and really ridiculized them, I lost my control. But, you know, you go and read the thread. You can clearly see who started the personal attacks. Those people do not know that I have this condition: http://www.ocfoundation.org/ I knew someone who had that and his life was a wreck. He never got it diagnosed but he should have because it really affected his job. He was excellent at what he did but he could never say "okay this is good enough". He'd keep tweaking and tweaking and tweaking. We eventually had to let him go because he never got anything done on time. Anyway as far as this group goes the only thing that I've noticed that really sets people off is when people say things are such and such a way, offer nothing to back it up other than "because I say so" and then get mad or insulting if you don't agree with them. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Ferrin wrote in
: On 3 Jan 2004 22:39:44 -0800, (Alejandro Magno) wrote: Thanks for the videos, you can find more he http://www.globemaster.de/airextreme/jets.html Alejandro Magno I That video of the B-52 crashing is a pretty scarey one. The A6 video always shocked me, but I never saw the whole video to know the poor guy actually survived, and infact without major injury. Thank's! BTW, anyone know if the F16s in the lineup were hit by the tornado in the shot there? Regards... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Bjørnar Bolsøy The A6 video always shocked me, but I never saw the whole video to know the poor guy actually survived, and infact without major injury. Thank's! His name was John David Bridges. He gave an interview on a programme called Ripley's believe it or not. He revealed that he only suffered minor injuries and named his son Blade after the incident. TJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
acro videos | Kirill Barsukov | Aerobatics | 3 | October 13th 04 01:45 AM |
Neww FAA handbook and DVD videos are hereg7a6w | Pilot Pubs | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 6th 04 12:02 AM |
Neww FAA handbook and DVD videos are herehI0ggY | Pilot Pubs | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 01:24 AM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
'Fightin' Eagles' set to train on F/A-22 Raptor jets | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 26th 03 10:10 PM |