A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

House proposal to restrict general aviation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 3rd 04, 02:37 AM
David Reinhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't send letters, send a fax. All congressional mail now goes through
decontamination and takes a couple weeks to get there. Better, call and follow up
with a fax.

Talking points:

1. The bill requires the DHS to establish TFRs whenever the threat level is orange
or higher. If the level is raised because of a specific, credible threat in Los
Angeles this language requires TFRs everywhere, even the East coast.

2. During the immediate post-9/11 period the FAA issued a nuke TFR but refused to
release the geographic coordinates of the plants to pilots so they could avoid the
facilities. Are we to be faced with the same dilema for thousands of sites across
the country, or is the government going to release "targeting data" to the public?
Is there even a navigational data base available with the locations of all
"sensitive" installations?

3. Given the large number of installations involved (potentially thousands) the
entire Victor airway system along with possibly hundreds of instrument approaches
would be compromised. Virtually all IFR GA traffic would be halted.

4. Many DOE facilities and other installations described in the legislation are
already located inside Restricted areas.

5. Congress should not be trying to micro-manage the Executive branch.

Dave Reinhart


John wrote:

C J Campbell wrote:


On February 11, Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA) proposed the amendment
titled "Secure Existing Aviation Loopholes."


Hmm, Markey's my Congressman. Frankly I'm not surprised by this, although I am
surprised that his colleague Marty Meehan (D-Mass) didn't come up with this
first. Any suggestions for explaining in a letter why this is a bad idea or is
that just a waste of my time? About 3-4 years ago, AOPA had a legislative
alert to contact Senator Kerry (D-Mass) about a pending bill. I tried, even
called his office, but I might as well have tossed a fruitcake at a freight
train. I finally did get through to some staffer who explained to me that all
of my ideas were wrong, have a nice day.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Owning 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Owning 0 May 11th 04 10:36 PM
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat Scott Schluer Piloting 44 November 23rd 03 02:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.