A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 10, 06:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
villinski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of
faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a
signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided
that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an
original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal."

Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA
about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders
altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars
with little or no benefit.

cheers,
Paul
  #2  
Old February 9th 10, 06:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
David[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

It appears that the local FSDOs make their own policy with regard to
this. I and others have sent our program letters to the Houston FSDO
via scan attached to email and they were perfectly happy with it.

Davikd
  #3  
Old February 9th 10, 09:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

On Feb 9, 1:01*pm, villinski wrote:
I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of
faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a
signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided
that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an
original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal."

Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA
about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders
altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars
with little or no benefit.

cheers,
Paul


Invest in the stamp.
Program letters aren't going away any time soon. There is a long
history that reflects the FAA position that they are accomodating us
and this is the price we pay for such accomodation.
Yes- it is a waste.
UH
  #4  
Old February 9th 10, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,099
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

On Feb 9, 11:01*am, villinski wrote:
I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of
faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a
signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided
that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an
original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal."

Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA
about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders
altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars
with little or no benefit.

cheers,
Paul


Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the
original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be
faxed.

Frank Whiteley
  #5  
Old February 9th 10, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

On Feb 9, 3:01*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:
Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the
original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be
faxed.



Do you mail it certified with return receipt? At least with a FAX I
get a delivery confirmation, and so far no complaints from SDL FSDO.

Andy
  #6  
Old February 10th 10, 06:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,099
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

On Feb 9, 3:34*pm, Andy wrote:
On Feb 9, 3:01*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:

Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the
original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be
faxed.


Do you mail it certified with return receipt? At least with a FAX I
get a delivery confirmation, and so far no complaints from SDL FSDO.

Andy


Haven't, but you can now get Delivery Confirmation service also. A
bit cheaper than certified.

Frank
  #7  
Old February 10th 10, 01:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
T8
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

The FAA has nothing on the USPTO when it comes to faxes.

http://tinyurl.com/yanesuv

Washington DC: 61 square miles surrounded by reality.

-Evan Ludeman / T8
  #8  
Old February 11th 10, 12:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
glidergeek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 183
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

Would somebody be so kind as to show or copy paste an example of a
program letter?
  #9  
Old February 11th 10, 01:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
David[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

Here's mine, specifics deleted to protect the innocent.

Schleicher ASWXX, Serial Number 12345, NXXXXX

This Glider/Sailplane is certificated in the Experimental
Classification for Exhibition/Air Racing. The Modified Operating
Limitations require that a list of proposed events to be attended be
submitted to your office yearly. The aircraft is planned to be flown
in the following scheduled events during 2010:
1. Region 5 Contest, Perry, SC, 19 Apr – 24 Apr, 2010
2. Region 10 Contest, Cherry Valley, AR, 24 May – 29 May, 2010
3. Sports Class Nationals, Parowan, UT, 15 Jun – 24 Jun, 2010
4. 15M Nationals, Uvalde, TX, 3 Aug – 12 Aug, 2010
5. Region 4 South Contest, New Castle, VA, 20 Sep – 25 Sep, 2010
6. Region 4 North Contest, Fairfield, PA, 10 Oct – 16 Oct, 2010
7. Attempts at World, National and State Soaring records recognized by
the Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI) and the Soaring
Society of America (SSA).
8. Proficiency and practice flights as prescribed in FAA Order
8130.2f.

Sincerely,



  #10  
Old February 11th 10, 04:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
BT[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Program letter cannot be faxed -- original must be mailed...

The "received fax" is processed electronically, converted to PDF or similar
file, it is not printed, and then routed through internal email to be
processed.
A lot of this happens automatically, no human intervention.

We have this system at work, but it will process upside down pdf files and
email them.
BT

"T8" wrote in message
...
The FAA has nothing on the USPTO when it comes to faxes.

http://tinyurl.com/yanesuv

Washington DC: 61 square miles surrounded by reality.

-Evan Ludeman / T8


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS:Original Glasflugel 304 Pete Russell Soaring 0 March 5th 06 11:58 PM
Sample annual program letter Noel Luneau Soaring 2 January 8th 05 06:45 PM
G-1: which is considered "the original" Kai Glaesner Piloting 4 November 27th 04 05:25 AM
The original Boeing 727 Chris Piloting 11 May 23rd 04 07:30 PM
Original F-117 Sketch robert arndt Military Aviation 13 February 18th 04 02:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.