If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
The more things change...
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in
: "DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... Montblack wrote: ("Joe Kultgen" wrote) I'm kind of curious about one thing though. Whatever happened to that guy who was suing the FAA under provisions of the ADA claiming the weight limits for ultralights discriminated against heavy people? This sound delicious... Any news out there? Yeah, I hear he built the World's Smallest BD-5 as revenge, but revenge isn't complete until you can fit your fat a$$ into the cockpit and fly the thing without crashing and burning on an El Pollo Loco grill... Sorry, bubba, but I can fit into my BD-5. Funny how you haven't got the confidence to fly it then. . |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that
Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw Scott ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-) Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
In article , Scott says...
What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw Scott ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-) No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now I'm gonna go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I know... I know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-) Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost made me spew my de-caf this AM. Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
Morgans wrote:
"Dan" wrote Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level. DABEAR has long ago gone below the levels of decency I would expect to find here, on his way to insulting another. It does not matter how much it is deserved, to me. It matters how you go about it. The pride you keep in yourself. There is no high ground anywhere around these exchanges, anymore. Isn't it about time for this round to end? Agreed. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
DABEAR wrote:
Dan wrote: Y'know, it's one thing to attack a person personally and another to attack that person's family. I personally feel family is off limits. I don't see the need to stoop to yawn's level. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired snip You could have spoke to Mr. Jimenez first but didn't. But that's all right...I like to protect my own, anyway. Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to not expect better from him. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Scott says... What?! Are you saying the apple doesn't fall far from the tree and that Juan isn't setting a good example for his son? Oh, pshaw Scott ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-) No...honest...that's what I think,Oh pshaw not withstanding LOL!!! Now I'm gonna go out on a limb and go as far as to say "like Father like son"..I know... I know ,that's a pretty wild opinion but I said it :-) Oh Pshaw ...I love it I haven't that for a very very long time almost made me spew my de-caf this AM. Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret Didn't Richard "Rick" Pshaw invent the taxi cab? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
"Dan" wrote Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to not expect better from him. My reasoning, also. -- Jim in NC |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
Morgans wrote: Doesn't matter who started it, at this point. Yeah, actually it does. You have made your point, so has he. I didn't ask you to stop it, or anyone else, either. I asked nobody. I only asked if it was time for it to end. Not without taking a shot at my morality. Your moral compass has no place on Juan's choice of battlefield. I hadn't had communications with him in some while. He went into hiding. That's it. He invoked my name in his fight with Hitlaw, I just learned about it, I have a response. If you want moral threads, take yourself out of this one and start them. Then invite others over to your threads to discuss more pertinent, ON TOPIC issues. Don't impose your morality on me, though. I'm not "all emotional" about anything, either. By the way, who's the bully, here... Seems like you have that covered. He's clearly lost, yet he and you both continue, making no point at all. It is all pure bile. I didn't see him as losing. Especially, when he and his Master continue their tirades for what is it now? TWENTY years!? I'm impressed that you have stood up to him. I'm sure everyone is. Wow. Big deal. I am not impressed with your stand in particular. Comments like "Wow. Big deal," are clearly for those who are tired of battle. Moral is down. But I'm not here to impress you people. I am new to Campbell's ways, got Zoomed, and now I'm going to pound the you know what out of him for it. I have two individuals involved in claiming they are Journalists and committing acts involving lying to their readers, their advertisers, about their advertisers, about other individuals who do not deserve the good press they give them. Then, both are walking safety hazards in regards to Aviation. And no one in the Federal Government is doing anything about them, and in fact, are aiding and abetting both. These confrontations here are nothing...USENET confrontations are a joke. It's when Juan and his Master Jim Campbell, get confronted face to face, get confronted in the Alternative Press and the Xtreme Alternative Press, then get confronted in Mainstream Press, along with their supporters, which include thugs at the RARA (Reno Air Races) and some frauds at the RRL ~ both of which have announced publicly, in the Press, that they are working together at this time... .... then real progress can be made getting those two clowns under control. But the Press right now isn't involved. We've contacted the mainstream Press in regards to some of the fraud issues your boyz Jim and Juan are connected to. Only one response out of over sixty sent. The Press is poised to make a bigger hero out of Jim Campbell than what he makes out of himself. When they do, what is your argument going to be then? I quit caring, long ago. Then why are you here? Start a moral thread of your own elsewhere. Start more than one. But if this fight is not for you, don't be here for it. There is no shame. You quit caring and I'm sure everyone understands why and is fine with that. You are a Godly and moral man, of that I'm sure. But I'm not here to fight Godly and moral men. I'm here to fight the opposite. And each man possesses his own moral compass. But let's not be mistaken here...there are other issues beyond the legitimate issues posed by RAH-14 against Campbell and Jimenez. I have my own fight with these two clowns. You indicated that DA BEAR "long ago..." went lower than ... This is not a RAH-14 fight anymore. There are several NEW, independent fights underway and RAH-14 has a library of information that can prove quite useful if presented in a Court of Law, to the new causes. I am here doing research on behalf of those other causes. Anything I can do to assist RAH-14 against these immoral clowns I would dearly love to. But I'm not here to fight for RAH-14, per se ~ there's still a lot of vigor in the original members as it is; I'm not here to impress; I'm here to pick a fight with the Bullies that have been ailing all of you, because they've been "out there" in the world beyond USENET, ailing others too ~ though I dare say, these other RAH-14 cases can benefit them, even after twenty years of fighting ~ I am here on behalf of two other causes and am prodding and provoking Ol' Juan, and Jimbo the Rocket Clown right behind him, into making mistakes and giving up information, and so far, they have given up yarns. So STUPID are these two, Juan and Jim, that I can flat out announce this here and they will take cover for a while, stop talking, stop fighting, hide, whatever, but I can count on them to be back. Juan is only here because Jim can't be. Jim keeps getting his fanny waxed and that's not good at a time when he's about to materialize as the "Hero" he has always proclaimed himself to be. That is because, after trampling all his victims and their rights over thirty-plus years of time, he is now networked with RRL, RARA and the Mainstream Press, like Boyle at MSNBC, to have any story told about him that he wants. All are working together to protect him at this time. A Court filing by the Spring will stop that. I haven't been here that long. Some of the people here have been here since this group's existence, fighting the malarkey of Jim Campbell, and now, his Agent and Vector, Juan Jimenez. I've just joined the fight. And I won't be quitting the fight until the July/August time frame next year at the earliest, when I expect it will be concluded in favor of those in the new causes poised against Campbell and more importantly, those who aide and abet him. The more important fight is in Court anyhow. The problem is, obtaining the evidence and witnesses needing to take those two down for the criminal actions and misconduct. The evidence against them all by itself, is substantial and more than what's needed. My individual case ~ involving Federal Perjury by Mr. Campbell ~ is just icing on the cake and is still within time limits due to New Discovery... ....that Discovery being the "thirty years of documented misconduct" that has been in existence all along. I only discovered it recently as the result of a lucky Google Search. So pardon me if I have vigor in this fight that you don't. This is a new fight now, and you don't have to be here for it. You have done your part. You can withdraw without one ounce of shame being attached to it. However, I can't. I am sworn to the U.S. Government to eradicate people like Jim Campbell from Society's existence. And I take my oath seriously. I have not seen a word JJJuan wrote, since long ago, except as quoted by others. I have not seen anything you wrote for the last day or two, except as quoted by others. See any simmularity? He's still posting and will be until he's taken down. I hadn't seen anything recently until I came across the thread the other day. He got knocked down like you said, but opened his big mouth for something other than food, and spat something he shouldn't have. He screwed up in other words, because those I have been speaking with believe he received an order to shut up in my regards and avoid confrontation with me at all costs. His Vanity and Ego are bigger than his a$$ might ever be, and as someone has pointed out here, the shadow of his a$$ alone, is in excess of the 200+ pound weight he claims describes his entire, worthless, sagging, frame. He lost long ago in my eyes. You have lost lately, by continuing. To parapharase: "Wow! Big Deal!" I've only been in the fight just over a year against these people...and I don't plan on staying until the second anniversary. I intend to end their misconduct quickly. And I have just the leverage to do that. And the abilities in a Court of Law to back it up. I don't care if you continue. I have not asked you to stop. I, nor anyone else should not have to. I don't care. Then why the low shot directed against me? I'm not interested AT ALL in a fight with you. No doubt in my mind you're a good man. Whatever animousity exists between you and I over these two posts, I'd like to end that right now. However, I am not ending my pursuit of Justice for myself and in particular, for a man who died because Campbell revealed himself to be a fake Journalist, sold out, and would not help that man, who had a legitimate case against Thugs and Racketeers operating behind Aviation as their facade. I intend to pound Campbell and Jimenez mercilessly, and frankly, this is where the battles have been laid out for some twenty years (more or less)...this is likely where they will continue. There are others here interested in continuing fights on their own or collectively, based on a different moral compass...that which they possess, which differs from yours or mine. However, Jimbo and Yawn fight dirty. Very dirty. Then they invoke the High Ground Moral Clause on others, while sniveling their existence in the muck and the mire that few care to roll up their sleeves and dive into, because they too, like you, are good men and prefer the High Ground, even if they lose. Losing against these two, however, and those that aide, abet, assoicate with, and/or support them, is not an option. There are greater issues in Law beyond these two existing in outlying cases you know nothing about, but that both men are connected to. THOSE are my fight and this one is joined so I can glean information out of these two that has not been forthcoming in the amounts that I need ~ to include offers of witness testimony, by at least one witness who has up and disappeared after the offer ~ that could bury Campbell in a Federal prison for the remainder of his life and totally bring the hammer down on Jimenez' head for his work as an accessory in Campbell's scheming. Both men know that and both men are deathly afraid. Their valor, like their claims, totally faux. They will melt through the floor cracks and drip down into hell, of the Court that exist beneath the witness stand, where they will sit and be scrutinized in examination and cross-examination. As will their friends in RRL and RARA, among others. So, there are OTHER cases...be advised of that. None having anything to do with the RAH-14 group, though the cases of RAH-14 and this new fight against Campbell could find themselves in a win-win scenario with cooperation. Campbell's Modus Operandi is the same...that is the critical key to conviction. However, without cooperation, I have to fight my way, not the way of another man, no matter how Golden his Moral Compass is, and let me tell you ~ and I mean this in all sincerity ~ your's shines! No doubt in my mind you are, in your own way, correct about the Higher Ground. But these people respect no such arguments and in fact, invoke the clause on their victim's collective conscience, and they escape prosecution of their crimes because of the goodness of others. 100 good cops will not stop these people. 14 Good Cops shall not stop them. 14 Good Cops in cooperation with One bad cop shall. Is it that you have to get the last word? I now give you that opportunity; Already took it. Let's you and I bury the hatchett. I have no fight with you. I know that you are correct in your own way. However, your ways are not my ways and that is also painfully clear. And my philosophy is now alongside that of Emerson, who essentially says: "I cannot care about what other people say ~ there is but what I must do." So, unfortunately, no matter what other people say about me, or think about me, or how they judge me in the end and for all time, I am fighting the ruthless and must fight them more ruthlessly than anyone could possibly envision or imagine. I have just joined this fight. Take a breather. You don't ever have to fight them anymore. You have done enough. Let their newer victims take up the fight and kick their butts up between their ears. It will be so much easier for us, the new victims, since the Old Victims and RAH-14 have done such a decent job of tenderizing their rumps for roasting! RAH deserves better. That's why it's time RAH won! In Public view on the enemy's battlefield of its own choosing. That's why I mentioned Juan having started this. Not some childish excuse or defense, but rather, an issue of Juan choosing the battlefield he thought he could win on. He must be fought, and so too Campbell, on the battlefields of their choosing, because victory in battle is based literally on the term "High Ground." Those that have it...win. Those that don't...lose. Those who claim it and lose...never had the High Ground in the first place. And I have already mentioned about those two invoking the High Ground against their victims, while wallowing in the sewage themselves. The battle is to reclaim stolen "High Ground" and to punish those guilty of doing the stealing and living their lives as the human incarnation of raw sewage. Twenty years of struggle against these two mental defects is long enough. Time to go for the kill. The evidence against Campbell et all, is substantial. The witnesses in testimony would be profound. The government will have to act or lose a tremendous amount of face. The case is a good one and well positioned against these two and others...all someone has to do is act and you will be free of the burden of their oppression. Twenty years lifted off the shoulders of good people deserving justice. That is what can occur at this point in time. -- Jim in NC I mean you no harm; I leave you particularly, in peace. DA BEAR (a.k.a. Mark S. "Bear" Daniels) |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
Dan wrote: Yes, I could have "spoke" to yawn first, but I learned long ago to not expect better from him. Understood. However, my responde to Jim in NC will address the issue of why I fight and on the ground of the enemy's choosing, so I'll leave you with that. I have no fight with you and as with Jim in NC, I leave you in peace as well, but am staying for Jimenez and Campbell. I have work to do in regards to these two and it's dirtier than you'll ever know and has to be to defeat their tactic of fighting dirty, then invoking the High Ground Moral Clause on their victims. Plus, there are other (several) cases you're unaware of not connected but potentially benficial ~ and vice versa ~ to what RAH-14 has put together. All involving vast amounts of history that can take them down once and for all time. If we get support and cooperation. Just the same, their new misconduct has been so bad that we may take them down anyway. Again, I leave you in peace. I have NO fight with you. But I'm staying for Juan and Jimbo at ANN. My communications with you and Jim in NC are at closure. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Sebring and Hitlaw
Richard Riley wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:49:44 -0600, Dan wrote: Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret Didn't Richard "Rick" Pshaw invent the taxi cab? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Yes, but his son, GB Pshaw was a playwrite, like Pshakespeare. You may have seen his "Pygmalion" - which was made into the musical "Pi Phair Plady." Yes, the P is silent just like the P in swimming. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|