Gw Bush toy doll in flightgear - now available

(top post)

If you read my comment, it was about "Joseph" not Bush.

Take this out of the binaries groups and into alt.politics. I don't go
there. I come to the binaries groups for images - binaries- not political
rubbish.
--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
John Howard doesn't speak for this
Australian in the Amrosi death sentence -
Jail, not death.

"Rob Heywood" wrote in message
...
Bush didn't lie "exactly" just like Clinton didn't lie. Right??



Alan Erskine wrote:

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Joseph" wrote in message
...

Bush lied. Pretty simple, really.


Spoken like a true moron.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

No, he's simple - said it himself.
--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
John Howard doesn't speak for this
Australian in the Amrosi death sentence -
Jail, not death.

Alan Erskine wrote:

I come to the binaries groups for images - binaries- not political
rubbish.
--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
John Howard doesn't speak for this
Australian in the Amrosi death sentence -
Jail, not death.

If you are not here for political rubbish, then why pray tell
does your SIG file this past month or so contain a political
statement that is nothing but political rubbish.

"Speaking of Rubbish" wrote in message
...
If you are not here for political rubbish, then why pray tell
does your SIG file this past month or so contain a political
statement that is nothing but political rubbish.

It's a statement that is on every post I make. It is not inappropriate as
the comments it is attached to are usually on-topic. The discussion was
semi-on-topic to begin with and has just slid down the hill since then.

I'm posting to abp.aviation while the other groups in the header have
appeared since the thread started. Why use a false name and email addy like
"rubbish at rubbish.com" (rochester.rr.com)?

--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
John Howard doesn't speak for this
Australian in the Amrosi death sentence -
Jail, not death.

Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Bob Harrington" wrote in newsPe%a.153045$uu5.23497
@sccrnsc04:

Rob Heywood wrote:
Yes, Republicans are SO good at naming and labeling. The Dem's
should do the same by calling and labeling Rep's as greedy
neo-fascist's who's only real religion is money and power.

"Should"...? WTF do you think they do every time they open their lie
holes?


Speaking of "lie-holes" (whatever that is),
what do you think of the following kneeslapper?


"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological
laboratories. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations
resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more
weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong,
we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding trailers Iraq bought from Britain
to inflate hydrogen gas balloons.

No doubt to make cute little animal balloons for the kiddies in the
villages Saddam gassed...

Grantland wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:


Speaking of "lie-holes" (whatever that is),
what do you think of the following kneeslapper?


"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological
laboratories. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations
resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more
weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong,
we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding trailers Iraq bought from Britain
to inflate hydrogen gas balloons.

Little ****ing freak, in his little ****ing freaksuit. Cocky little
birdlike strutting freak. A twisted, deformed little spirit utterly
unworthy of the Presidency.

You heard it here.

Heard it lots of places. Doesn't make it any less silly.

Joseph wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:

(Grantland) wrote in news:3f3d4045.37561276@ct-
news.iafrica.com:

Mitchell Holman wrote:


Speaking of "lie-holes" (whatever that is),
what do you think of the following kneeslapper?


"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological
laboratories. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations
resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more
weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong,
we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding trailers Iraq bought from Britain
to inflate hydrogen gas balloons.

Little ****ing freak, in his little ****ing freaksuit. Cocky little
birdlike strutting freak. A twisted, deformed little spirit utterly
unworthy of the Presidency.

You heard it here.

Grantland

Wonder how long it will take the Loyalists
to resort to their "yea, well what about Clinton"
diversion.......

According to Article 85 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)
Bush (the present) is a *deserter.*

You, of course, will provide evidence of his court martial and
conviction on these charges.

"Bob Harrington" wrote in news:5gp%a.128633$Oz4.26239
@rwcrnsc54:

Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Bob Harrington" wrote in newsPe%a.153045$uu5.23497
@sccrnsc04:

Rob Heywood wrote:
Yes, Republicans are SO good at naming and labeling. The Dem's
should do the same by calling and labeling Rep's as greedy
neo-fascist's who's only real religion is money and power.

"Should"...? WTF do you think they do every time they open their lie
holes?


Speaking of "lie-holes" (whatever that is),
what do you think of the following kneeslapper?


"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological
laboratories. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations
resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more
weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong,
we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding trailers Iraq bought from Britain
to inflate hydrogen gas balloons.

No doubt to make cute little animal balloons for the kiddies in the
villages Saddam gassed...


using helicopters supplied by the Reagan administration....

David Stinson schrieb:

Rob Heywood bleated:

The Dem's should do
the same by calling and labeling Rep's as greedy neo-fascist's who's
only real religion is money and power.

Another emotional fool swallows the Democrat "Big Lie."
Ahh well... sheep will always need shepards, even if
they are constantly sheared by them....

Sorry, this metapher is used for guys like you...







--
"Wenn du eine Leidenschaft hast, solltest
du dich durch Pr=FCgel nicht stoppen lassen."

Al Pacino

Mitchell Holman schrieb:

"Bob Harrington" wrote in newsPe%a.153045$uu5.23497
@sccrnsc04:

Rob Heywood wrote:
Yes, Republicans are SO good at naming and labeling. The Dem's shoul=
d
do the same by calling and labeling Rep's as greedy neo-fascist's
who's only real religion is money and power.

"Should"...? WTF do you think they do every time they open their lie=

holes?


Speaking of "lie-holes" (whatever that is),
what do you think of the following kneeslapper?

"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological
laboratories. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations
resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more
weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found
the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong,
we found them."
George Bush, 5/31/03 regarding trailers Iraq bought from Britain
to inflate hydrogen gas balloons.

This guy is really that stupid...unbelievable!





--
"Wenn du eine Leidenschaft hast, solltest
du dich durch Pr=FCgel nicht stoppen lassen."

Al Pacino

"Outgoing V. Incoming" wrote:

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:06:41 GMT, Joseph wrote:

According to Article 85 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)
Bush (the present) is a *deserter.*

Are you really an idiot or do you just play one on Usenet?

Bush was not on active duty. He was a member of the Air National
Guard. There is no "AWOL" or "Deserter" status with the Guard while
not on Federal duty.

The worst one could claim -- and the evidence is missing rather than
present -- is that he "missed training."

You can wish it were true, but that doesn't change it.

You can read the text of Article 85 at-

http://usmilitary.about.com/library/...htm?once=true&

"Any member of the armed forces who-" Point out where it mentions duty status.
Was GWBush a member of the armed forces or not?

BTW, why do you guys resort to personal insults when someone points out
something not to your liking?

J