A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Superior HK XM8 Kicks M4's Ass



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 04, 10:16 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Superior HK XM8 Kicks M4's Ass

http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!

Rob
  #2  
Old July 5th 04, 02:52 PM
Evan Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gee let's see. The M-16/M4 has at least been tested in real combat
conditions as opposed to what the manufacturer (HK) says the HK XM8 does in
the lab. This HK XM8 looks like some European artsy fartsy BJ. That's just
what we need, more cheap plastic firearms. I am proficient with the M-16
and have confidence that I can hit what I am aiming at, but I would have
much preferred to carry an M-14 or even an M-1 Garand (I decided a while ago
to avoid the argument as to which one is the greatest battle rifle in the
entire universe by purchasing one of each). I forget who said this, I think
it was an US Army Colonel but I'm probably wrong. But anyway he said that
"We should give the men a semi-automatic rifle and teach them how to use it"
or something along those lines. Before the days of the 5.56 bullet, you
never heard anyone say "Put two in the chest and one in the head". With a
150 grain .30 cal. bullet it was put one in the torso and the only way he
gets back up is with someone else's help. Does this wonderful new weapon
have provision for a bayonet? It obviously doesn't have a convenient hand
hold for when you have to club someone. Marines like me tend to think about
those things for when we make our "last stand". I used to do the
occasional post here several years ago, but lately I've just been lurking.
From an "outsiders" point of view, you're just a looser wantabe. Maybe when
junior high starts back up in the fall, your ilk will be back in school and
not tying up bandwidth.

Evan Williams
SSgt USMC (ret)

PS What does this have to do with aviation? Other than this piece of crap
can probably fit into a helmet bag.



"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!

Rob









  #3  
Old July 5th 04, 04:18 PM
tw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Evan Williams" wrote in message
ink.net...

Apologies for off-topicality

snip

I would have much preferred to carry an M-14 or even an M-1 Garand (I

decided a while ago
to avoid the argument as to which one is the greatest battle rifle in the
entire universe by purchasing one of each).


I've always wondered, what are the differences between the M1, the M1 Garand
and the M14? Is it just cosmetic stuff like magazine capacity, barrel length
and shape of the stock etc, or is there a big difference in the action?

/*obligatory nationalist point scoring to be taken with pinch of salt*/
Of course, the SLR kicked both their arses, and the Lee-Enfield was better
still! ;-)

snip


  #4  
Old July 5th 04, 06:12 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 5 Jul 2004 02:16:43 -0700, (robert arndt) wrote:

http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!

Rob



Wow. The latest HK assault rifle is superior to a forty-year-old
American design. Something to brag about indeed. Loser.
  #5  
Old July 5th 04, 06:33 PM
Paul J. Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , tw
writes
I've always wondered, what are the differences between the M1, the M1 Garand
and the M14?


M1 rifle was named the Garand: chambered for .30-06 and feeding from an
eight-shot charger.

M14 was very similar, but was chambered in 7.62mm NATO, used a
twenty-round box magazine, and in some versions had a full-auto
capability (little used and often deleted)

Is it just cosmetic stuff like magazine capacity, barrel length
and shape of the stock etc, or is there a big difference in the action?

/*obligatory nationalist point scoring to be taken with pinch of salt*/
Of course, the SLR kicked both their arses, and the Lee-Enfield was better
still! ;-)


Now, for lethality you want a Martini-Henry

--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk
  #6  
Old July 5th 04, 10:37 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (robert arndt)
Date: 7/5/2004 4:16 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!

Rob


Congratulations, teuton, it only took 40 years for you Germans to catch up with
us.

Having said that, you really do need to get over your inferiority complex and
try to stay on topic.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #7  
Old July 5th 04, 10:56 PM
Regnirps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wow! I always wnated to go into combat carying a feminine hygein product. I can
see the hair curler, but where is the shaving cream dispense?

-- Charlie Springer
  #8  
Old July 5th 04, 11:57 PM
Adriano Quintal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Regnirps" wrote in message
...
Wow! I always wnated to go into combat carying a feminine hygein product.

I can
see the hair curler, but where is the shaving cream dispense?



XM8 was actually designed by HK's US subsidiary as part of the OICW project
and will be manufactured in the US.




  #9  
Old July 6th 04, 03:43 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message
...
In message , tw
writes
I've always wondered, what are the differences between the M1, the M1

Garand
and the M14?


M1 rifle was named the Garand: chambered for .30-06 and feeding from an
eight-shot charger.

M14 was very similar, but was chambered in 7.62mm NATO, used a
twenty-round box magazine, and in some versions had a full-auto
capability (little used and often deleted)


Also, there was the cal .30 carbine.
Per TM9-1276:
M1 Carbine with wooden stock, semi-automatic.
M1A1 Same but folding metal stock.
M2 Carbine with selector for semi or full auto.
M3 Same but accepts sniper-scope. ( see TM5-9341)



  #10  
Old July 6th 04, 06:37 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(B2431) wrote in message ...
From:
(robert arndt)
Date: 7/5/2004 4:16 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!

Rob


Congratulations, teuton, it only took 40 years for you Germans to catch up with
us.


How so moron since we Germans invented the assault rifle in WW2 as the
STG-44 and the last was Mauser's STG-45... which the Mauser team went
to Spain and developed as the Cetme... before returning to Germany as
HK improving the design into the G-3... which has led to both the
incredible G-11 and new G-36.
IIRC, you got your crummy M-16A-1 which fouled like a MF in Vietnam...
20 years AFTER the Mauser STG-45.

Having said that, you really do need to get over your inferiority complex and
try to stay on topic.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


What would an AF jerk like you know about rifles anyway? Ever fired
once since boot? I'll bet I own and have fired more assault weapons in
my 20s than you ever fired during your entire military career/life. My
dad was a weapons inspector and I still have a fairly large pre-ban
arsenal at home.

Rob
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-102 pilot kicks sailors ass D. Strang Military Aviation 22 March 26th 04 05:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.