If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Certificating the SparrowHawk
Operating the SparrowHawk under Part 103 has never made any sense to
me, for several reasons: there are operating restrictions (prior permission required to fly into an airport with a control tower, etc.); there's a common "that's not a real airplane" response you get from airports and tow operators; and from the manufacturer's point of view it seems unwise to develop a high-wing-loading, high-performance sailplane and essentially advertise "no license required." (License or not, you need training to fly something like that.) I understand you can buy one and apply for an Experimental airworthiness certificate for it under the Exhibition and Racing category. Perhaps that's even the "manufacturer's recommended procedure." I think that's what I'd do. This, however, creates a new consideration: now we have the prospect of a US company producing manufactured sailplanes with the explicit intention that they should be certificated as Experimental. I don't think this was ever something the FAA had intended. I seem to recall that they got a bit unhappy about imported gliders being certificated this way instead of going through a proper certification program. Anyone got any insight into that? Is it something they would try to stop? Or would it be fine with them these days? I actually think it would make a lot of sense in general to allow manufactured aircraft to be certificated one at a time using the Amateur-build Experimental flight testing program. This would allow manufacturers to get sales started without having to go through the cost of full certification. If the model was successful, a flight test program could then be done by the manufacturer, allowing them to get a Normal category type certificate, and all later units would be sold with type certification rather than as Experimental. Not only would this help US manufacturers, it could help improve the safety of the current Amateur-built Experimental market by allowing people to buy a manufactured version of the same aircraft (instead of being required to build it themselves). As the buyer, I'd probably want the factory to do the test flight program...! (Although if they had a good reputation and a proven design, who'd worry?) Just some thoughts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SparrowHawk gyrocopter model for X-plane available | Noel Lopez | Rotorcraft | 1 | September 22nd 09 05:24 AM |
SparrowHawk owners, lets hear from you! | Gus Rasch | Soaring | 13 | May 14th 04 07:36 AM |
Wanted Sparrowhawk | David Bingham | Soaring | 18 | May 4th 04 11:20 PM |
Sparrowhawk vs PW5 | Willie | Soaring | 16 | March 4th 04 11:08 PM |
Jet Glider Sparrowhawk | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 31 | January 22nd 04 06:09 AM |