If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Vectors IFR Flight Into California Mountain
Larry Dighera wrote:
Which particular "bog-standard" ATC instructions are you referring to? "3BW, turn left, a heading of 290, vector to final, descend and maintain 3000." The pilot seems to have complied with all the instructions he acknowledged receiving that I'm aware of prior to the handoff to SoCal. At that point it appears that he lost radio contact with ATC and continued on the last vector he had received. From the LiveATC recording, SoCal's 290 heading assignment doesn't appear to have been received by the pilot. Certainly it wasn't acknowledged. N133BW is not on the LiveATC recording after the ATC handoff to SoCal at 01:05 into the recording he http://www.liveatc.net/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=13234.0;attach=888 3. That could be a result of many things. The SoCal receiver is not the same as the Santa Monica tower receiver. These are just volunteer radios, not official tapes from ATC. There's no way to tell what the plane transmitted other than by inference. Your assertion that there were transmissions from the aircraft after the handoff to SoCal that were not captured on the LiveATC recording seems unfounded. Do you have another source for those transmissions from the aircraft that you believe are missing on the LiveATC recording? The first SoCal transmission to the plane was clearly a response to a call from the plane. He gave him the altimeter and didn't repeat it, which implies the plane read it back correctly. Two and a half minutes later, ATC gave him the vector to final which he didn't respond to. They then repeatedly tried to get him to respond, even calling him on another frequency. Two minutes later, it sounds as though ATC thought they had him, "we've been trying to get ahold of you, turn left immediately and climb..." Another 3 minutes of trying to get him to climb or turn, and then it was too late. I agree that the information available to date does not appear to imply a violation by SoCal controllers. Good. "ATC error" in a fatal crash is not something to be expressed without a very good reason. -- Don Poitras |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bad vectors, no hand off | Lurker | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | February 13th 07 10:03 PM |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
FAA Blessing for Blue Mountain or Rocky Mountain instruments??? | dave | Home Built | 2 | May 26th 06 01:56 PM |
finding mountain passes for flight planning? | John T | Piloting | 46 | March 28th 06 07:04 PM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |