A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 18th 08, 07:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
JR Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad

"Eunometic" wrote:

If one accepts your point that autonomous probe movement will upset the pilots
ability to mate with the probe there is then still scope to 'stabilize' the
probe or rather to smooth its behavior when there are gusts around.


Sure. However, dynamic "smoothing" will likely get the basket out of synch with
the airplanes just like unintended autopilot or unbriefed boomer inputs. Static
smoothing methods, e.g., "tuning" of the hose characteristics, might work
better.


What about shifting the paradigm a little. The aircraft automatically or
manually formates at an appropriate spot behind and below the tanker and then
remains stationary while the probe flies itself to the drogue.


I think that automatic stationkeeping would work better with the AF version,
especially with UAVs.

After all, the current concept IS to fly on the tanker, NOT on the drogue! It's
when the pilot tries to fly formation on the drogue that he begins to "chase" it
as the pilot did in the video. When pilots new to air refueling finally "get
it," they wonder why it was so hard in the first place!



  #12  
Old September 19th 08, 12:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Mike Kanze
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 114
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad

One reason the boom method works is that the boom is that the actively flown into the recepitcal.

And it is completely impractical for carrier operations. Boom-capable aircraft cannot operate from carriers. Buddy-store equipped FA-18s can.

Boom refueling is certainly the way to go for the heavies, whose inertia precludes the rapid, close-in corrections needed. Hose-and-drogue is compact and ideal for carrier-based tanking assets, and also can be / is fitted onto those land-based tankers that support probe-configured aircraft, as shown in the video.

--
Mike Kanze

"I prefer my tragedy and despair in limited doses."
- Sherman the shark

"That's what golf is for."
- Hawthorne the hermit crab

Sherman's Lagoon, 4/5/08

"Eunometic" wrote in message ...
On Sep 18, 3:36 am, "Mike Kanze" wrote:
...Proving once again that it's not as easy as it looks. Bow wave from the tankee's nose and burble
from the tanker aircraft are constants that the pilot must factor for a successful basket plug.


It would appear to me that the probe and drogue system is now far more
basic than it needs to be to be and is therefore less effective and
reliable than it should be.

One reason the boom method works is that the boom is that the actively
flown into the recepitcal.

It should be possible to place sensors and controls (flappers, fins or
a basket that can twist to direct itselt) that stabilizes the drogue
and allows it to fly further from the aircraft. Ideally it should
'home' itself towards the probe slightly to help the pilot. A simple
LED lamp with a specific flashing frequency can serve as a homming
point.



Note that the hose failed to retract into the tanker as it should have once the second (successful) plug was made and the basket was shoved forward.

Those of you laughing have likely never tried this in a low fuel state / night situation, with a pitching deck awaiting your recovery. Not anyone's idea of happy fun.



  #13  
Old September 19th 08, 04:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 105
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad


*
* Those of you laughing have likely never tried this in a low fuel state / night situation, with a pitching deck awaiting your recovery. Not anyone's idea of happy fun.


Some aircraft also have multiple drogues at each wingtip.

Also, drogues breakoff, as shown in the video, hose retracts, when you
get back to station, its easy to fit a new one on and you're good to
go.
  #14  
Old September 19th 08, 04:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Dan[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad

frank wrote:

Those of you laughing have likely never tried this in a low fuel state / night situation, with a pitching deck awaiting your recovery. Not anyone's idea of happy fun.


Some aircraft also have multiple drogues at each wingtip.


Name one.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #15  
Old September 19th 08, 06:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
John Weiss[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad

"Dan" wrote...

Some aircraft also have multiple drogues at each wingtip.


Name one.


Dodging the specifics of the unclear language (multiple drogues ON THE AIRPLANE;
on the wing but not necessarily at the "wingtip"), KC-130s have a drogue on each
wing; and most/all KC-10s have been retrofitted with WARP (Wing Air Refueling
Pod) on each wing in addition to the centerline boom and hose.


  #16  
Old September 19th 08, 08:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Bob Liberty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Video: When Aerial Refueling Goes Bad

Also fuel flow is higher with a boom. About 5000 lbs per min. Important when giving 80,000 or a bunch more to a heavy.
ole nav
"Mike Kanze" wrote in message . ..
One reason the boom method works is that the boom is that the actively flown into the recepitcal.


And it is completely impractical for carrier operations. Boom-capable aircraft cannot operate from carriers. Buddy-store equipped FA-18s can.

Boom refueling is certainly the way to go for the heavies, whose inertia precludes the rapid, close-in corrections needed. Hose-and-drogue is compact and ideal for carrier-based tanking assets, and also can be / is fitted onto those land-based tankers that support probe-configured aircraft, as shown in the video.

--
Mike Kanze

"I prefer my tragedy and despair in limited doses."
- Sherman the shark

"That's what golf is for."
- Hawthorne the hermit crab

Sherman's Lagoon, 4/5/08

"Eunometic" wrote in message ...
On Sep 18, 3:36 am, "Mike Kanze" wrote:
...Proving once again that it's not as easy as it looks. Bow wave from the tankee's nose and burble
from the tanker aircraft are constants that the pilot must factor for a successful basket plug.


It would appear to me that the probe and drogue system is now far more
basic than it needs to be to be and is therefore less effective and
reliable than it should be.

One reason the boom method works is that the boom is that the actively
flown into the recepitcal.

It should be possible to place sensors and controls (flappers, fins or
a basket that can twist to direct itselt) that stabilizes the drogue
and allows it to fly further from the aircraft. Ideally it should
'home' itself towards the probe slightly to help the pilot. A simple
LED lamp with a specific flashing frequency can serve as a homming
point.



Note that the hose failed to retract into the tanker as it should have once the second (successful) plug was made and the basket was shoved forward.

Those of you laughing have likely never tried this in a low fuel state / night situation, with a pitching deck awaiting your recovery. Not anyone's idea of happy fun.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modernizing the Aerial Refueling Fleet. Mike Naval Aviation 1 October 20th 06 01:35 AM
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue Mike Naval Aviation 26 July 11th 06 11:38 PM
Aerial Photographs/Aerial Patrols [email protected] Piloting 10 December 15th 04 01:43 PM
Defense Science Board Aerial Refueling Requirements study Guy Alcala Military Aviation 1 June 2nd 04 12:55 AM
CH53 refueling video John Rotorcraft 2 December 5th 03 11:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.