A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VOR approach SMO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 07, 09:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway. That's the
difference between the pros that were landing without any fan fair and you,
without a clue.

Karl


"B" wrote in message ...
karl gruber wrote:
I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet.
Any jet will do that all day long.

Karl
"Curator" N185KG


So, now you're past the runway and landing on the VOR shack.

It is 1.54 miles from CULVE to the beginning of the runway.



  #2  
Old July 23rd 07, 09:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 1:18 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?


No, he's right. The VOR (and therefor the DME readings) are on the
*OTHER* side of the runway. So the distance from CULVE to the
threshold is pretty short, and creates a pretty wild let down from
1000 feet.

-Robert

  #3  
Old July 23rd 07, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

No, the VIS is 3. It doesn't matter where the VOR is. You can be at 680 6.7
miles out. When you are 3 miles from the AIRPORT, it will be in sight.

Karl



"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 23, 1:18 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?


No, he's right. The VOR (and therefor the DME readings) are on the
*OTHER* side of the runway. So the distance from CULVE to the
threshold is pretty short, and creates a pretty wild let down from
1000 feet.

-Robert



  #4  
Old July 23rd 07, 09:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 1:18 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway.


No, with 800 foot ceiling you will be at 1120 when at CULVE, making it
hard to see the runway through the clouds.

-Robert

  #5  
Old July 23rd 07, 10:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Not with DME, you'll be at 680 far before CULVE.

Karl
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 23, 1:18 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway.


No, with 800 foot ceiling you will be at 1120 when at CULVE, making it
hard to see the runway through the clouds.

-Robert



  #6  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VOR approach SMO

What you advocate is a violation of the FARs, but I guess that is the
way it is with Cessna Curators.

So, what is your minimums busting scheme when the weather is right at
minimums; i.e., 600 and 1?

karl gruber wrote:
Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway. That's the
difference between the pros that were landing without any fan fair and you,
without a clue.

Karl


"B" wrote in message ...

karl gruber wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet.
Any jet will do that all day long.

Karl
"Curator" N185KG


So, now you're past the runway and landing on the VOR shack.

It is 1.54 miles from CULVE to the beginning of the runway.




  #7  
Old July 24th 07, 01:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default VOR approach SMO

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:18:29 -0700, "karl gruber"
wrote:

Where are you digging up such erroneous thoughts?

With 800/3 you'll be way outside CULVE when you see the runway. That's the
difference between the pros that were landing without any fan fair and you,
without a clue.

Karl



Karl,

You are misreading the chart.

The underlined 1120 at CULVE means that is the minimum altitude at that
location.

IF you can identify CULVE, then AFTER passing CULVE you may descend to
680', but not before.

The * next to CULVE means only that if the Tower is closed, DME is
required. The * does not change the 1120 to 680.

Also, it is not in accordance with TERPS to allow a 680' minimum altitude
at CULVE with the nearby 863' tower.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #8  
Old July 23rd 07, 08:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VOR approach SMO

karl gruber wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY drive
down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet
will do that all day long.

Karl
"Curator" N185KG


1120 at CULVE. 175 feet airport elevation. Difference 945 feet.
Distance from CULVE to runway 1.54 miles.
  #9  
Old July 23rd 07, 09:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Not with DME, or do you think that a Gulfstream wouldn't have DME??

Read the plate!

Karl


"B" wrote in message ...
karl gruber wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet.
Any jet will do that all day long.

Karl
"Curator" N185KG


1120 at CULVE. 175 feet airport elevation. Difference 945 feet. Distance
from CULVE to runway 1.54 miles.



  #10  
Old July 23rd 07, 11:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VOR approach SMO

I am reading the plate. Apparently, you are not.

karl gruber wrote:

Not with DME, or do you think that a Gulfstream wouldn't have DME??

Read the plate!

Karl


"B" wrote in message ...

karl gruber wrote:


I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet.
Any jet will do that all day long.

Karl
"Curator" N185KG


1120 at CULVE. 175 feet airport elevation. Difference 945 feet. Distance
from CULVE to runway 1.54 miles.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR approach SMO Robert M. Gary Piloting 124 August 3rd 07 02:17 AM
first approach in IMC G. Sylvester Instrument Flight Rules 10 July 12th 05 02:14 AM
No FAF on an ILS approach...? John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 7 December 24th 03 03:54 AM
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 45 November 20th 03 05:20 AM
Brief an approach Ditch Instrument Flight Rules 11 October 14th 03 12:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.