If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"D. Strang" wrote in message news:0C38c.473$zc1.37@okepread03... "Ed Rasimus" wrote One of the first things I learned (it wasn't obvious), was that you end up mothering your men. The object is to get them through their tour. There's always one guy who has the IQ of a turd, and these guys are always popular. You have to really brow-beat the men and find ways to get their attention. Especially after losing five or six guys in one battle. They are either very depressed, or very ****ed off, and it takes constant commands to focus the battle. If you're lucky you have at least one NCO, who is meaner than you could ever be. My experience as an enlisted man was very bad (outside of combat). When you are in the states or some overseas cesspool, just putting in time, then everyone wants a piece of you for slave labor. I was once grabbed off the street, and found myself unloading railroad cars. We had a couple radar troops with us. They felt they were just slaves. You would never find officers doing that kind of work. But you would find college graduate highly technical specialists just cannabolized for the body count. We broke a lot of stuff just to get even. My experience, at many bases between 1976 and 1997, was completely different. Or, is it possible that there are some officers (I'll contend a lot of them,) who respect their subordinates, depend upon them for support and value their expertise? It all makes sense until you see the daily detail list. E-7's driving bus, E-8 inventory the clothing store, E-5 waxing the bowling alley, etc. Then you go to your real job. Amazingly, in 20 years, I never did (or saw) anything remotely like that. Details? Extra duty and training for EDM (RAF Upper Heyford) Veterans Day parade in Albany NY (Griffiss AFB) Extra standby duty to unload cargo A/C (Hill AFB) Tutor for a marginal airman who was failing his CDC/OJT requirements (Ramstein AB) Volunteered to outprocess and drive to the airport an airman who was getting kicked out (Ramstein AB) Cleanup and final lookaround after the airshow crash at Ramstein Never did anything like what you report, nor did anyone else I worked with. I guess flightline personnel were already too overworked to be tasked for bowling alley waxing. Of course, other career fields did have other, weird, extra duties. Finance and CBPO personnel tasked as aux SP's, for instance. Dangerous fools. But... The bowling alley had their own civilians for waxing. The clothing store had their own civilians for inventory. Transpotation SQ handled the bus driving duties. Now...if you were at a remote base somewhere, with limited civilian personnel...things may be different. During my commanders welcome meeting in his office, we all sat at his table and told him he had a terrible moral problem. I wasn't there a week, and I found the place a disaster. He looked us square in the face and said he will make sure all of us would wish we were never born, jumped-up and yelled to get the hell out of his office. He lasted another month before the Colonel got rid of him, but the damage was done, and we were just enlisted people, so suck it up. Bad commanders exist. Eventually, they either leave or change. Bad managers in cubeland exist. And they are harder to get rid of. Let's acknowledge first, that most C.O.s deal through chain of command. Their attitudes, information, and reactions are filtered through levels of junior officers and NCOs. There are some organizations in which the C.O. does deal with the lowest ranks, but in most units, there are several levels. Or, maybe you didn't mean C.O., but rather simply meant "supervisor"--then you've still got to deal with different ages, levels of maturity, and degrees of technical expertise. In my example above, the higher enlisted ranks were almost never to be found. The commander had no eyes and ears. I agree with you on this. "I need 5 guys for ...." Are you, as the NCOIC or OIC going to go? Or do you get 5 airmen? All I have to do is go into a squadron and look at the detail list, or watch all the enlisted troops picking up trash with their garbage bags dragging behind them to know that nothing has changed. Sure, some guys get tasked to police up an area. But it isn't nearly as common (in recent years) as you make it out to be. Pete |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:19:21 -0600, "D. Strang"
wrote: All I have to do is go into a squadron and look at the detail list, or watch all the enlisted troops picking up trash with their garbage bags dragging behind them to know that nothing has changed. I don't know where and when you served, but clearly you've got a wealth of experiences. I can only say that during my 23 years with the company I seldom saw that sort of thing going on. That included stateside TAC and ATC (plus MAJCOM), PACAF two tours in combat ops, and USAFE (operational and Hq). Throughout, there was mutual respect for the support troops and high morale. Long hours and harsh working conditions occasionally, but there was always a strong sense of mission and a keen awareness that it was the whole team that made it happen. My final tour on active duty was Air Liaison Officer with the 4th ID (mech), where I got some insight into Army operations. The differences in numbers (and hence ratios) of officer to enlisted were very apparent. Clearly there was more room for the sort of thing you describe on the green side of the house, but the successful units maintained the same sort of relationships that I saw on the blue side. The days of traditional European conscript (18th/19th Century) "rank & file" versus officer corps--"keep a stiff upper lip" seem pretty much over. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven Wagner" wrote in message hlink.net... Does anybody know what the USAF tends to do when people with a directly translatable skill, i.e. civilian aircraft mechanics or computer programmers, enlist? I expect that they would have to go through basic training, but would they have to go through the entire course of technical training that somebody with no experience in the skill would have to go through? Yes. Nowadays, tech school is like extended Basic. You're still learning how to be in the USAF, along with the bare bones basics of your future job.. Along with how the AF does things, from a/c maintenance to programming. Of which I did both. There used to be a thing known as Direct Duty Assignment, but evidently the last person to do such graduated BMT in March 1994. "17 Mar 94 As a part of the Year of Training initiative, all new recruits hd to attend technical training school immediately following basic military training. The last recruit to bypass technical training and receive a direct duty assignment graduated from BMT on this date" http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil/ho/atc90s.htm Pete |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Pete" wrote: Does anybody know what the USAF tends to do when people with a directly translatable skill, i.e. civilian aircraft mechanics or computer programmers, enlist? I expect that they would have to go through basic training, but would they have to go through the entire course of technical training that somebody with no experience in the skill would have to go through? Yes. Nowadays, tech school is like extended Basic. You're still learning how to be in the USAF, along with the bare bones basics of your future job.. Along with how the AF does things, from a/c maintenance to programming. Of which I did both. There used to be a thing known as Direct Duty Assignment, but evidently the last person to do such graduated BMT in March 1994. What jobs does the AF have which require no schooling after boot camp? Even grunts have schooling after basic. It must be equivalent to the ubiquitious USN Buffer Tech rating. ; 0 --Mike |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Wise" wrote What jobs does the AF have which require no schooling after boot camp? I googled for "Direct Duty Assignment" and found a few references. Mostly admin type jobs, it seems. A few skill jobs, like in CE. http://www.afrc.af.mil/908aw/ccmbio.htm "..graduated from Basic Training at Lackland AFB and received a direct duty assignment to the 306 Civil Engineering Squadron, McCoy AFB, Florida, and was assigned to the pavements section." Even grunts have schooling after basic. It must be equivalent to the ubiquitious USN Buffer Tech rating. ; 0 An Army 11B *is* a skill to be learned. More than just walking around in the woods with a gun. Pete |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Pete" wrote: What jobs does the AF have which require no schooling after boot camp? I googled for "Direct Duty Assignment" and found a few references. Mostly admin type jobs, it seems. A few skill jobs, like in CE. http://www.afrc.af.mil/908aw/ccmbio.htm "..graduated from Basic Training at Lackland AFB and received a direct duty assignment to the 306 Civil Engineering Squadron, McCoy AFB, Florida, and was assigned to the pavements section." Even grunts have schooling after basic. It must be equivalent to the ubiquitious USN Buffer Tech rating. ; 0 An Army 11B *is* a skill to be learned. More than just walking around in the woods with a gun. That's why they get at least some schooling. --Mike |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Wise" wrote
What jobs does the AF have which require no schooling after boot camp? Even grunts have schooling after basic. It must be equivalent to the ubiquitious USN Buffer Tech rating. ; 0 There used to be a field for vehicle operators. Today it's just an additional duty. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:20:41 -0700, Ed Rasimus
disturbed the phosphur particles on my screen with the following: Show me a unit which routinely demeans the enlisted personnel without respect for their capabilities and I'll show you a failed unit. Fighter Squadron 33, Naval Air Station, Oceana, Virginia 1958. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven Wagner" wrote in message hlink.net... Does anybody know what the USAF tends to do when people with a directly translatable skill, i.e. civilian aircraft mechanics or computer programmers, enlist? I expect that they would have to go through basic training, but would they have to go through the entire course of technical training that somebody with no experience in the skill would have to go through? Thanks. I do not know the current practice but when I enlisted in the USAF in 1955 I made sure I took some documentation of a skill with me. I did not qualify for the USAF tech school but was offered a chance to take a Bypass Test, scored a record score and was awarded a three level AFSC during basic training. This also cost me extra weeks at Sampson AFB as they had to request an assignment for me as the normal ones were for airmen going to Tech School or directed OJT slots. They had nothing for people graduating with a skill. Regards, Tex |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Once upon a time in the blurry past, I had a young man working for me who had
completed apprenticeship training as an asbestos worker (read "insulator"), really skilled, leader of men, I trusted him wiyj 20 man crews $400,000 (equivalent to $5 plus million in today's market) projects then. Really good troop! He knew his draft number was coming so he enlistedm "with civilian acquired skill". Army tried to make him a cook, AF tried to make him an AP, Navy at least put him in steam power, reasonably close to his civilian learned skill. He finally retired from the Naval Reserve as a Commander some twenty three years later. Needs of the service, ya know. Rick MFE N1535 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Army fears skilled helicopter pilots will fly away | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 11th 04 11:48 PM |
Maintenance Personel | Charles Talleyrand | Military Aviation | 5 | August 5th 03 11:35 PM |