If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:16:05 +0100, Pooh Bear
wrote: Smutny wrote: As I mentioned, it is in the long run. I didn't say that the 737 in all its variations was a mistake. That would be ignoring the historical sales figures. And they go back a long, long way ! What I was pointing to was that Boeing should have continued the product line commonality idea started with the 757/767, bringing to market a whole new airframe to replace the narrowbody fleet. That design would have been reaching full production about now. Instead, they opted to re-hash, for a third time, a 1960's design. So..... Airbus's idea of making multiple capacity variants of the ( 737 competitor ) A320 ( A318, A319, A320, A321 ) was more sensible I guess ? Same cockpit - same operating procedures - same handling ( fbw ) . Then they made bigger twin aisle versions ( A330, A340 ) with the same flight controls and similar handling - making conversion very easy. The big selling point on cockpit commonality is drastically reduced training and recurrency costs to the airlines. Crew movement up and down the fleet is also simplifed as various factors change route needs and employees are re-deployed. The beauty of having one airfame in various fuselage lengths is not only cockpit comonality, but maintenance and spares issues are simplified as well. Was that what you reckoned Boeing should have done after 757/767 ? Boeing scuttled the process when the 777 was not 'in the family' and competed with the larger 767s. The 757-100 was never built, and the -300 came too late to save the line. The 737 Next Gen is had an adverse impact on the 757-100 development. So in essence, Boeing created its own competition and that hurt. That should have been better thought through. Boeing has put itself in the precarious position now of developing a new design as the worlds major airlines are struggling. A380 is a pretty new concept too ! Mind you, I saw a documentary where Airbus's Chief Exec simply jokingly described it as an A330 stuck on top of an A340 ! I have no idea if Airbus is making the A380 cockpit common to any of the rest of thier line. But when you go after the biggest or the fastest parts of the evelope, it's hard to stay common. Similar cockpit ( but somewhat larger ), controls and handling to other fbw airbuses are promised. Ease of conversion once again. Graham |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are Boeing's plans? | Pooh Bear | General Aviation | 55 | September 30th 04 07:59 PM |
What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | General Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 09:19 PM |
What are Boeing's plans? | Pooh Bear | Owning | 12 | September 27th 04 09:07 PM |
What are Boeing's plans? | Pooh Bear | Owning | 13 | September 27th 04 06:05 AM |
What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | Military Aviation | 62 | September 27th 04 12:23 AM |