If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
"Gezellig" wrote in message
... On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:51:36 GMT, Mike wrote: "Gezellig" wrote in message ... Who determines where you can or cannot land one? Whoever owns the water. How do you determine who does? Most bigger lakes are going to be controlled by the state or by a local water authority. The state would be a good place to check first. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
Frank Olson wrote: Otherwise it's "keep your eye out for deadheads" (and deadbeat boat drivers) - at least in Canada. Yes. One cottage owner was steering his boat into floatplanes to thwart them from landing. He also called and complained that the plane operator was at fault and cutting off his boat. Witness' proved otherwise. He was a summer owner from the US. Tourists. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Zebulon" @###@.^net wrote in : "Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:33:30 GMT, Drew Dalgleish wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:36:24 -0400, Gezellig wrote: Who determines where you can or cannot land one? In Canada it's the pilot. Let's say the State of X is the water owner. In CA, the pilot can land anywhere. Without penalty? In US? Where is the jurisdiction enforced? At least in the Midwest US, most of the lakes are controlled by the US Army Corp of Engineers. They maintain one of more offices in every state around here. They arrest you for going tinkle in then, did they maxie? Bertie Since you're not really a pilot or live in the US, I guess you wouldn't know. But maybe you could look it up on Google sometime. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
"Zebulon" @###@.^net wrote in :
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Zebulon" @###@.^net wrote in : "Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:33:30 GMT, Drew Dalgleish wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:36:24 -0400, Gezellig wrote: Who determines where you can or cannot land one? In Canada it's the pilot. Let's say the State of X is the water owner. In CA, the pilot can land anywhere. Without penalty? In US? Where is the jurisdiction enforced? At least in the Midwest US, most of the lakes are controlled by the US Army Corp of Engineers. They maintain one of more offices in every state around here. They arrest you for going tinkle in then, did they maxie? Bertie Since you're not really a pilot or live in the US, I guess you wouldn't know. Yeh, right fjukkkwit. But maybe you could look it up on Google sometime. OK, got "Maxie arrested for tinkiling in a lake" and got this: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...6T70-4CCPFY4-1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view= c&_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=63cde644b5026d49b1b0 ab86dbbf1fa5 Naughty Maxie! Bertie |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... OK, got "Maxie arrested for tinkiling in a lake" and got this: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...6T70-4CCPFY4-1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view= c&_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=63cde644b5026d49b1b0 ab86dbbf1fa5 Naughty Maxie! Bertie At lease it proves you can run Google, but it's a much better example on just another one of your many lies. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
C'mon maxine, how's about a few gay lames for a change, k00kie boi?
"Maxine" @_#~#@.^net wrote in :
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... OK, got "Maxie arrested for tinkiling in a lake" and got this: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...6T70-4CCPFY4-1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view= c&_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=63cde644b5026d49b1b0 ab86dbbf1fa5 Naughty Maxie! Bertie At lease it proves you can run Google, but it's a much better example on just another one of your many lies. Aww, the k00k is calling me a liar again. Bwawahwhahwahhwhawhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhhawhahwhahw hahwhahwhah! Bertie |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
C'mon maxine, how's about a few gay lames for a change, k00kie boi?
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
... "Maxine" @_#~#@.^net wrote in : "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... OK, got "Maxie arrested for tinkiling in a lake" and got this: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...6T70-4CCPFY4-1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view= c&_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=63cde644b5026d49b1b0 ab86dbbf1fa5 Naughty Maxie! Bertie At lease it proves you can run Google, but it's a much better example on just another one of your many lies. Aww, the k00k is calling me a liar again. I bet that hurts almost as bad as when the village idiot calls you stupid. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:22:11 +0200 (CEST), ET wrote:
Whoever owns the water. How do you determine who does? http://www.seaplanes.org/library/wld.htm Thx! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:16:16 GMT, Mike wrote:
How do you determine who does? Most bigger lakes are going to be controlled by the state or by a local water authority. The state would be a good place to check first. Yeah, I'm in FL, we have private waters, submerged land leases (marinas, boat docks, etc) and State-Owned (beaches). Will check FL. Private waters I suppose would be trespassing. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Amphibious Planes
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:17:50 -0500, Zebulon wrote:
"Gezellig" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:33:30 GMT, Drew Dalgleish wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:36:24 -0400, Gezellig wrote: Who determines where you can or cannot land one? In Canada it's the pilot. Let's say the State of X is the water owner. In CA, the pilot can land anywhere. Without penalty? In US? Where is the jurisdiction enforced? At least in the Midwest US, most of the lakes are controlled by the US Army Corp of Engineers. They maintain one of more offices in every state around here. FL here, ACoE, Water Management Districts, some FL DEP, State, it's a mess. What got me interested was a poster who was claiming he liked the Icon A5 which is built around the corner from me. http://www.iconaircraft.com/ The statement was he thought it would be neat to be able to fly from lake to lake or whatever, the idea of freedom of access to many waterbodies (the sports, shores, camping, etc). Sounded nice to me as well but practical? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mustangs of Old, concluded - P-51 Mustang Amphibious Variant.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 30th 06 03:52 AM |
Underwater planes are the most dangerous planes !!!!! | Bruno Beam | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 14th 04 04:01 AM |
WANTED: Flying Boat or amphibious trike | Dennis Chitwood | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 11th 04 05:34 AM |
Australian Amphibious carriers with JSF? | Henry J Cobb | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 7th 04 07:16 AM |