If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
THe guy who designed the new charts for Providence, Bob Llewellyn, told me
that crossing radials are used if they meet the criteria. I thought he said 30 degrees, but it might have been an angle greater than 30 degrees to the course. The only navaids here that might work are Norwich (ORW), and Putnam (PUT). I think there may be a distance limitation as well, which probably rules out PUT and possibly ORW as well. Ben Jackson wrote: In article , Ray Andraka wrote: Ben Jackson wrote: Ohhhh, this must explain why HIO ILS 12 no longer uses ABATE LOM. How are the intersections it now uses identified? DME or a crossing radial? If you google it you can see a thread I started about that very thing a few weeks ago. I think the new intersection is COUVE (coo-vee) and it's on the localizer and it's identified by radials off of UBG and BTG, both more than 30 degrees away from perpendicular. There's also a DME distance from UBG. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |