If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... ubject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 5:41 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Ragnar" Date: 3/2/04 12:24 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/1/04 7:52 PM Pacific Standard Time You are so ****ing stupid and ignorant. YOu can't be drafted into Air Crew or into the Air Cadet Corps. It is 100% a volunteer service, How stupid can you be? Your ignorance is appalling. Uhmm..you were the one who specifically stated you received your call-up notice on your eighteenth birthday, and have at the same time repeatedly claimed to have volunteered for service (not just for flight duty). So what's the story (this time)? You got your notice and high tailed it to the recruiting office in order to stay one-step ahead of serving in the infantry, or what? Brooks Your lack of military experience is turning you into a bigger fool than ever.. fool. You were obviously drafted since oyu never volunteered for anything where you might get hurt. I guess you are the Ohio Coward. Right? Art, why not just answer the question? What question asshole? Again with the namecalling. Is that all you can do? One would think a man of your years and alleged experiences would be more mature. As for the question, you read Kevin's post and know the question. Just answer it and end the silliness. Because it is apparently another one of those questions that he can't answer, as it would demonstrate that his past repeated claims that he was purely a volunteer for service were as lacking in truthfulness as some of his other rants. Art, as you know, has a long history of ignoring those questions that are problematic and instead leaping into baseless mudslinging. Brooks And exacrtly what is the lie you alledge I told liar? You still refuse to post it liar. That the Guard was a refuge for shirkers during WWII? (Kind of odd, being as the order mobilizing the *entire* National Guard was published one month *before* the draft was even approved by Congress) That the Guard was still recruting in 1943 when you went into the service? (False, as the Guard had been fully mobilized for about two years by that time, and there were no local units to join until those units were demobilized in 1945)And now, courtesy of your recent statement, all of those past claims that you "volunteered" for service, when in fact you only joined up after receiving your draft notice? That would be three falsehoods right there. And you KEEP forgetting that you already killfiled me (again)... Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:23 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... ubject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 5:41 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Ragnar" Date: 3/2/04 12:24 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/1/04 7:52 PM Pacific Standard Time You are so ****ing stupid and ignorant. YOu can't be drafted into Air Crew or into the Air Cadet Corps. It is 100% a volunteer service, How stupid can you be? Your ignorance is appalling. Uhmm..you were the one who specifically stated you received your call-up notice on your eighteenth birthday, and have at the same time repeatedly claimed to have volunteered for service (not just for flight duty). So what's the story (this time)? You got your notice and high tailed it to the recruiting office in order to stay one-step ahead of serving in the infantry, or what? Brooks Your lack of military experience is turning you into a bigger fool than ever.. fool. You were obviously drafted since oyu never volunteered for anything where you might get hurt. I guess you are the Ohio Coward. Right? Art, why not just answer the question? What question asshole? Again with the namecalling. Is that all you can do? One would think a man of your years and alleged experiences would be more mature. As for the question, you read Kevin's post and know the question. Just answer it and end the silliness. Because it is apparently another one of those questions that he can't answer, as it would demonstrate that his past repeated claims that he was purely a volunteer for service were as lacking in truthfulness as some of his other rants. Art, as you know, has a long history of ignoring those questions that are problematic and instead leaping into baseless mudslinging. Brooks And exacrtly what is the lie you alledge I told liar? You still refuse to post it liar. That the Guard was a refuge for shirkers during WWII? (Kind of odd, being as the order mobilizing the *entire* National Guard was published one month *before* the draft was even approved by Congress) That the Guard was still recruting in 1943 when you went into the service? (False, as the Guard had been fully mobilized for about two years by that time, and there were no local units to join until those units were demobilized in 1945)And now, courtesy of your recent statement, all of those past claims that you "volunteered" for service, when in fact you only joined up after receiving your draft notice? That would be three falsehoods right there. And you KEEP forgetting that you already killfiled me (again)... Brooks Arthur Kramer How come you never saw any combat? Cowardice? Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Kevin Brooks" And you KEEP forgetting that you already killfiled me (again)... Brooks I have a special motivation in taking you out of the killfile. And I'll keep you out for the foreseeable future. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:23 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... ubject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 5:41 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Ragnar" Date: 3/2/04 12:24 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/1/04 7:52 PM Pacific Standard Time You are so ****ing stupid and ignorant. YOu can't be drafted into Air Crew or into the Air Cadet Corps. It is 100% a volunteer service, How stupid can you be? Your ignorance is appalling. Uhmm..you were the one who specifically stated you received your call-up notice on your eighteenth birthday, and have at the same time repeatedly claimed to have volunteered for service (not just for flight duty). So what's the story (this time)? You got your notice and high tailed it to the recruiting office in order to stay one-step ahead of serving in the infantry, or what? Brooks Your lack of military experience is turning you into a bigger fool than ever.. fool. You were obviously drafted since oyu never volunteered for anything where you might get hurt. I guess you are the Ohio Coward. Right? Art, why not just answer the question? What question asshole? Again with the namecalling. Is that all you can do? One would think a man of your years and alleged experiences would be more mature. As for the question, you read Kevin's post and know the question. Just answer it and end the silliness. Because it is apparently another one of those questions that he can't answer, as it would demonstrate that his past repeated claims that he was purely a volunteer for service were as lacking in truthfulness as some of his other rants. Art, as you know, has a long history of ignoring those questions that are problematic and instead leaping into baseless mudslinging. Brooks And exacrtly what is the lie you alledge I told liar? You still refuse to post it liar. That the Guard was a refuge for shirkers during WWII? (Kind of odd, being as the order mobilizing the *entire* National Guard was published one month *before* the draft was even approved by Congress) That the Guard was still recruting in 1943 when you went into the service? (False, as the Guard had been fully mobilized for about two years by that time, and there were no local units to join until those units were demobilized in 1945)And now, courtesy of your recent statement, all of those past claims that you "volunteered" for service, when in fact you only joined up after receiving your draft notice? That would be three falsehoods right there. And you KEEP forgetting that you already killfiled me (again)... Brooks Arthur Kramer How come you never saw any combat? Cowardice? Actually, the lack of a need that required the services of my sort of specialized unit kept us from deploying for ODS, but if it makes you feel any better we were on the deployment list. There was not a great deal of need for bridge construction companies during that fight in the desert, and at the time that is the duty I was assigned to, commanding a company. How many units did you command? And again, you have been provided the examples of your false statements that you requested--why don't you try addressing those falsehoods of yours instead of heading off onto tangents? You asked for them, and you got them--what are you going to DO about them? Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:45 AM Pacific Actually, the lack of a need that required the services of my sort of specialized unit kept us from deploying for ODS, but if it Total horse ****. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:45 AM Pacific Actually, the lack of a need that required the services of my sort of specialized unit kept us from deploying for ODS, but if it Total horse ****. Really? Care to point out where the services of a fixed bridge construction outfit were required during ODS? AFAIK only one similar unit (264th EN CO (MGB), part of the 20th EN BDE out of Bragg) made it into the theater, where it promptly dumped its bridge in the sand and served as an ad hoc transportation unit. But hey, keep whining--it is kind of fun watching you dig that hole deeper, and deeper, and deeper... Now, back to your request that I specify those falsehoods of your's--I did so, and you still have not addressed them. Here they are again if you just happened to miss them: 1. You said the Guard was accepting recruits trying to avoid combat service during 1943. Untrue. 2. You said the Guard was a "laughingstock" during WWII when you were in the service--but in fact the Guard was in the thick of the fight, and the performance of the Guard divisions was not any different from that of the regular divisions, and was in some cases superior. As you are the ONLY individual I have ever witnessed who made such a claim, and you have repeatedly ignored the facts regarding where and when the Guard was in combat and what they both acheived and suffered, it appears that your assertion here was also false. 3. You have repeatedly claimed to have been a volunteer for military service--but you have recently admitted that you received your "call-up" on your eighteenth birthday. H'mmm...what's the *real* story there? Lastly, we could go into your repeated claims that your outfit "never missed its target"...but wait, in pont of fact another B-26 BG was recognized as having the best record for bombing accuracy throughout the ETO, and they missed at least *six* of their assigned targets. Curiouser and curiouser... Are you going to address these or not? My guess is "not", and you never intended to address them when you asked for the specifics in the first place. Why? Because you *can't*, not without admitting your past claims are pure, unadulterated bovine fecal matter. Leaving us wondering how much of your other "information" is of similar consistency. Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 12:27 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:45 AM Pacific Actually, the lack of a need that required the services of my sort of specialized unit kept us from deploying for ODS, but if it Total horse ****. Really? Care to point out where the services of a fixed bridge construction outfit were required during ODS? AFAIK only one similar unit (264th EN CO (MGB), part of the 20th EN BDE out of Bragg) made it into the theater, where it promptly dumped its bridge in the sand and served as an ad hoc transportation unit. But hey, keep whining--it is kind of fun watching you dig that hole deeper, and deeper, and deeper... Now, back to your request that I specify those falsehoods of your's--I did so, and you still have not addressed them. Here they are again if you just happened to miss them: 1. You said the Guard was accepting recruits trying to avoid combat service during 1943. Untrue. 2. You said the Guard was a "laughingstock" during WWII when you were in the service--but in fact the Guard was in the thick of the fight, and the performance of the Guard divisions was not any different from that of the regular divisions, and was in some cases superior. As you are the ONLY individual I have ever witnessed who made such a claim, and you have repeatedly ignored the facts regarding where and when the Guard was in combat and what they both acheived and suffered, it appears that your assertion here was also false. 3. You have repeatedly claimed to have been a volunteer for military service--but you have recently admitted that you received your "call-up" on your eighteenth birthday. H'mmm...what's the *real* story there? Lastly, we could go into your repeated claims that your outfit "never missed its target"...but wait, in pont of fact another B-26 BG was recognized as having the best record for bombing accuracy throughout the ETO, and they missed at least *six* of their assigned targets. Curiouser and curiouser... Are you going to address these or not? My guess is "not", and you never intended to address them when you asked for the specifics in the first place. Why? Because you *can't*, not without admitting your past claims are pure, unadulterated bovine fecal matter. Leaving us wondering how much of your other "information" is of similar consistency. Brooks Arthur Kramer That is a;l crap and distortions you made up out of your total ignorance of all matters military. How come you never came out from behind your safe desk and volunteered for Airborne? Scared?You are no soldier. You are just another sniveling wannabbee. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 12:27 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 11:45 AM Pacific Actually, the lack of a need that required the services of my sort of specialized unit kept us from deploying for ODS, but if it Total horse ****. Really? Care to point out where the services of a fixed bridge construction outfit were required during ODS? AFAIK only one similar unit (264th EN CO (MGB), part of the 20th EN BDE out of Bragg) made it into the theater, where it promptly dumped its bridge in the sand and served as an ad hoc transportation unit. But hey, keep whining--it is kind of fun watching you dig that hole deeper, and deeper, and deeper... Now, back to your request that I specify those falsehoods of your's--I did so, and you still have not addressed them. Here they are again if you just happened to miss them: 1. You said the Guard was accepting recruits trying to avoid combat service during 1943. Untrue. 2. You said the Guard was a "laughingstock" during WWII when you were in the service--but in fact the Guard was in the thick of the fight, and the performance of the Guard divisions was not any different from that of the regular divisions, and was in some cases superior. As you are the ONLY individual I have ever witnessed who made such a claim, and you have repeatedly ignored the facts regarding where and when the Guard was in combat and what they both acheived and suffered, it appears that your assertion here was also false. 3. You have repeatedly claimed to have been a volunteer for military service--but you have recently admitted that you received your "call-up" on your eighteenth birthday. H'mmm...what's the *real* story there? Lastly, we could go into your repeated claims that your outfit "never missed its target"...but wait, in pont of fact another B-26 BG was recognized as having the best record for bombing accuracy throughout the ETO, and they missed at least *six* of their assigned targets. Curiouser and curiouser... Are you going to address these or not? My guess is "not", and you never intended to address them when you asked for the specifics in the first place. Why? Because you *can't*, not without admitting your past claims are pure, unadulterated bovine fecal matter. Leaving us wondering how much of your other "information" is of similar consistency. Brooks Arthur Kramer That is a;l crap and distortions No, each and every one comes from your posts over the past few days. Other posters have already also called you on most of these points--you have, of course, refused to address any of their comments, instead choosing to lash out with your usual personal insults. Kind of funny, actually--one of the posters was excusing your "volunteering in front of immenent forced induction" and you were too dim to recognize it, so you lsashed and burned away at him, too. you made up out of your total ignorance of all matters military. Again, none were made up. You were earlier provided the direct quote that was the basis for a couple of those items--are you now claiming you never said any of these things? It won't be hard to verify the facts...so what is it going to be, are you gonna 'fess up to having made each and every one of these claims, or not (I hate to have to go back to Google, but if I must...)? How come you never came out from behind your safe desk and volunteered for Airborne? I did volunteer for airborne. There were not enough slots for those of us who did so. You have asked this before---why this fascination with "airborne"? Scared? No, and unlike you, i am not afraid of the truth, either. Keep digging that hole, Art... You are no soldier. You are just another sniveling wannabbee. No, Art, I have done the whole soldiering bit, for a lot longer than you did. And when I served, we did not take snot-nosed nineteen year old brats and turn them into instant-Lieutenants (though I am confident that the majority of those who were thus handled during your day were likely a lot better officers than you would have been). Nor were we driven to "volunteer" for service by an immenent draft threat. We did so because we thought it was the right thing to do, in spite of the fact that it was not nearly as popular an endeavor as it was during your day. And by the way, we won our war too; it was called the Cold War, and it would not have turned out the way it did if not for the efforts of the Ed's, the Gordon's, the BUFFDRVR's, the Paul Adams', etc., etc., and so on who saw fit to join up, or continue to serve even after "their" war was over. Some died doing their part, just as dead as any of your buddies who fell to flak, nor were the fatalities confined to flight crews or airborne units-- we had troops in our brigade die every time we hit NTC for a rotation, and we lost troops during the contstruction operations we executed in Central America as part of the fight against communism. Not something to make light of. Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 3/2/04 1:57 PM Pacific Standard Time ar too; it was called the Cold War, and it would not have turned out the way it did if not for the efforts of the Ed's, the Gordon's, the BUFFDRVR's, the Paul Adams', etc., etc., and so on who saw fit to join up, or continue to serve even after "their" war was over. Some died doing their part, just as dead as any of your buddies who fell to flak, nor were the fatalities confined to flight crews or airborne units-- we had troops in our brigade die every time we hit NTC for a rotation, and we lost troops during the contstruction operations we executed in Central America as part of the fight against communism. Not something to make light of. Brooks Arthur Kramer And all this has zero to do with you. Now go away you are getting boring. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
13 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 13th 03 08:47 PM |
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 11:58 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |