A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GNS 430 reception problems



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 6th 06, 01:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Kevin Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default GNS 430 reception problems

Hi,

I'm looking for folks that might have a similar experience. Recently
upgraded the panel to include a GNS 430 and replace one of those old
NARCO all in one VOR instruments plus an old NARCO radio.

Anyway great upgrade. The GPS function works wonderfully. Filing /g is
the best. The NAV function works great. Dual glide slope indicators(the
other is slaved to a KX-155) really makes IFR manageable.

The problem is the COM function of the GNS 430. We're only getting about
40 miles of range on the receive side of the COM. I'll call for flight
following on COM1(the GNS) and never get an RX indication. When I flip
over to COM2 (the KX-155) it works just fine. The KX has a range of at
least 80 miles. The GNS seems uneven. We can xmit and be heard over
distances but the receive side is really only useful in and about the
terminal area. This is less than optimal.

When we did the upgrade we kept the original antennas that were on the
plane(PA28-180).

Our avionics guy is baffled, maybe useless at this point. He swapped out
the GNS plus ran a myriad of other tests. He says everything is checking
out just fine. But that is surely not our experiences. So I turn it over
to the collective wisdom of the net. Has anyone else ever experienced
anything similar?

Thanks.
  #2  
Old September 6th 06, 03:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Clay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default GNS 430 reception problems


Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

  #3  
Old September 6th 06, 05:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default GNS 430 reception problems

The avionics shop should be able to test COM receive sensitivity through the
plane's antenna with the unit installed in the plane, very simply using a
suitable signal generator (that every shop should have.) The signal
generator is set up to transmit a very low level signal, modulated with a
tone, through a whip antenna located some distance (maybe 100 feet or so)
from the plane, in line-of-sight to its COM antenna. Signal level is
adjusted to the point that the tone is just heard through the COM receiver.
Calculating free-space loss for the distance (a standard calculation), one
can determine within a few dB the signal strength incident to the COM
antenna. This is not as precise as doing it on the bench with the signal
generator connected directly to the receiver, but it is sufficient to find a
gross problem and to troubleshoot it. This method CAN accurately measure
the difference in sensitivity between a plane's two COM receivers.

If your avionics guy doesn't understand this test you need a new avionics
guy.


-Elliott Drucker
  #4  
Old September 6th 06, 03:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
The Visitor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 231
Default GNS 430 reception problems



Clay wrote:
Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

Good point. An overy bent or kinked and pinched coax mould be a problem.

  #5  
Old September 6th 06, 03:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
ktbr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default GNS 430 reception problems

The Visitor wrote:


Clay wrote:

Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

Good point. An overy bent or kinked and pinched coax mould be a problem.

An easy way to test this would be to swap the coax between
the two radios and see if the 430 improves and/or the 155
degrades.
  #6  
Old September 6th 06, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dave Butler[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 124
Default GNS 430 reception problems

ktbr wrote:

Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

Good point. An overy bent or kinked and pinched coax mould be a problem.

An easy way to test this would be to swap the coax between
the two radios and see if the 430 improves and/or the 155
degrades.


Just as another data point, we had the same problem with our GNS480. The comm
section may be the same as the 430, I'm not sure about that. Anyway, we swapped
the antenna cables between the 480 and the KX155 to see whether the problem
stayed with the radio, or moved with the antenna. Oddly, the problem just went
away, or at least became less pronounced. Maybe something got unkinked, I don't
know. The KX155 is still the more sensitive receiver.

DGB
  #7  
Old September 6th 06, 08:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Mike Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default GNS 430 reception problems

You may find the coax cables are joined by bnc connectors under the panel
near the pilot's left knee. This may be an easy(er) place to swap com
antennas before trying to access the back of the radio trays to swap the
coax. The hardest swap is laying on your back in the tail cone checking the
connectors at the base of the antennas.

I have heard that com antennas come with a special coating to suppress
static buildup. Static charges can interfere with the radios. This coating
will eventually deteriorate and could also degrade radio performance. I
suspect such a buildup probably produces 'static' or popping in the
receiver.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel

"Kevin Clarke" wrote in message
nk.net...
Hi,

I'm looking for folks that might have a similar experience. Recently
upgraded the panel to include a GNS 430 and replace one of those old NARCO
all in one VOR instruments plus an old NARCO radio.

Anyway great upgrade. The GPS function works wonderfully. Filing /g is the
best. The NAV function works great. Dual glide slope indicators(the other
is slaved to a KX-155) really makes IFR manageable.

The problem is the COM function of the GNS 430. We're only getting about
40 miles of range on the receive side of the COM. I'll call for flight
following on COM1(the GNS) and never get an RX indication. When I flip
over to COM2 (the KX-155) it works just fine. The KX has a range of at
least 80 miles. The GNS seems uneven. We can xmit and be heard over
distances but the receive side is really only useful in and about the
terminal area. This is less than optimal.

When we did the upgrade we kept the original antennas that were on the
plane(PA28-180).

Our avionics guy is baffled, maybe useless at this point. He swapped out
the GNS plus ran a myriad of other tests. He says everything is checking
out just fine. But that is surely not our experiences. So I turn it over
to the collective wisdom of the net. Has anyone else ever experienced
anything similar?

Thanks.



  #8  
Old September 6th 06, 11:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
William Snow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default GNS 430 reception problems

I had a similar problem with two KX-170's.
Solution, corrosion, under the antenna at the BNC connectors....we replaced
coax, and antenna's. Problem fixed, radios AOK!


  #9  
Old September 6th 06, 11:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Kevin Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default GNS 430 reception problems

Dave Butler wrote:

Interesting that is the first time someone else has reported a similar
problem. We also (allegedly) did the swap the antenna test. I say
allegedly because I'm not convinced it ever occurred.

But because you had a similar issue with the KX155 could there be some
interaction there? I know that is a long shot but interference is a
funny thing.

Do other folks have a GNS4x0 and KX155? I've got to believe that is a
very very common config.

KC

ktbr wrote:

Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

Good point. An overy bent or kinked and pinched coax mould be a problem.

An easy way to test this would be to swap the coax between
the two radios and see if the 430 improves and/or the 155
degrades.


Just as another data point, we had the same problem with our GNS480. The
comm section may be the same as the 430, I'm not sure about that.
Anyway, we swapped the antenna cables between the 480 and the KX155 to
see whether the problem stayed with the radio, or moved with the
antenna. Oddly, the problem just went away, or at least became less
pronounced. Maybe something got unkinked, I don't know. The KX155 is
still the more sensitive receiver.

DGB

  #10  
Old September 7th 06, 03:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Mike Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default GNS 430 reception problems

I have a Garmin SL30 nav/com and a King com. Using the 'both' button on the
audio panel, the audio output level from the King drops precipitously.
Until I discovered this it appeared the King radio was no longer working
correctly after the SL30 was installed. In order to hear the outputs from
both of the radios at the same time the volume of the King must be
increased. When the radios are listened to by themselves, the King's audio
level is normal.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel

"Kevin Clarke" wrote in message
ink.net...
Dave Butler wrote:

Interesting that is the first time someone else has reported a similar
problem. We also (allegedly) did the swap the antenna test. I say
allegedly because I'm not convinced it ever occurred.

But because you had a similar issue with the KX155 could there be some
interaction there? I know that is a long shot but interference is a funny
thing.

Do other folks have a GNS4x0 and KX155? I've got to believe that is a very
very common config.

KC

ktbr wrote:

Sounds like the antenna or the coax.

Good point. An overy bent or kinked and pinched coax mould be a
problem.

An easy way to test this would be to swap the coax between
the two radios and see if the 430 improves and/or the 155
degrades.


Just as another data point, we had the same problem with our GNS480. The
comm section may be the same as the 430, I'm not sure about that. Anyway,
we swapped the antenna cables between the 480 and the KX155 to see
whether the problem stayed with the radio, or moved with the antenna.
Oddly, the problem just went away, or at least became less pronounced.
Maybe something got unkinked, I don't know. The KX155 is still the more
sensitive receiver.

DGB



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garmin 496 loss of satellite reception Dan Luke Piloting 5 August 22nd 06 04:30 PM
GPS Problems near CHD.. Dan Piloting 7 August 7th 06 10:46 PM
GPS Reception Problems with 396 Dan Piloting 16 August 5th 06 04:01 AM
Mooney Engine Problems in Flight Paul Smedshammer Piloting 45 December 18th 04 10:40 AM
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... Roy Piloting 4 July 12th 03 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.