If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"Sarah Hotdesking" wrote in message ...
I received this today:- There are still people in this company who think we weigh aircraft to find out how much they weigh, not to calculate stresses. Of course we need to know how much the thing weighs. How are we ever going to know how many Thrust Pixies we need to get the thing off the ground if we don't know the weight? Or should that be "Lift Demons"? Pixies have largely fallen into disrepute - something about Bernoulli not being representative in unbounded conditions and cause and effect being transposed in the Newtonian model. In fact the use of Lift Demons on civil aircraft programmes is generally not that good an idea. The Demon binding contract tends to specify payment in blood or souls. This is readily achievable with aircraft of military function, but frowned upon in civilian circles as they may attempt to acquire payment outside of the terms of their binding contract. Lift Demons are not used on Elf bombers. We don't talk about Lift Pixies too often as it seems to upset the self-loading cargo. Pixies require payment in cakes, flowers or nice thoughts. These are readily sourced either from the in-flight catering, or provided cost-free by the passengers. Clearly this would not work well within an operational military environment. Air force cooking is not renowned for the "light and fluffy texture" that Thrust Pixies demand, the availability of flowers might be problematic in desert operations, and nice thoughts may also be hard to find during times of active operations. There is also a scalability issue. While one rampant Lift Demon would have few problems supporting a fighter aircraft (particularly if there is an immediate prospect of blood), it'll struggle to achieve level controlled flight of a 560tonne Airbus A380. Use of more than one Lift Demon on the same flight vehicle is contra-indicated (they squabble and eat each other). Communities of Thrust Pixies can be encouraged to work together on the same aircraft by the provision of advanced technologies such as Lemon fondant icing, variegated tulips or in-flight romantic comedies. Ryanair once requested Leprachauns be installed in place of Lift Pixies, but leprechauns have a mission statement which indicates their desire for monetary gain, and their willingness to search all over the world for it. This makes Lift Leprechauns expensive to keep (gold vs lemon fondant icing), and makes it difficult to establish a regular route network as the Lift Leprechauns don't like to continuously visit the same locations. By law, aircraft also have to have a full complement of In-Flight Gremlins, but these are generally not a problem unless you feed the Wingtip Vortex Faeries after midnight. A better link to new Non Lift Demon Article: http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0031-9120/38/6/001/ Jan-Olov Newborg |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote in message ...
(Jack Linthicum) writes: For those lucky enough to find theselves in Tokyo and in need of a real spicy food fix may I recommend the Restaurant Ajanta? Try the dry minced curry (Called Chicken Korma in the rest of the world) and be very careful if you are offered what appears to be an innocent marinated vegetable salad. http://www.ajanta.co.jp/index-e.html They used to be in a little hole-in-the wall near the Indian Embassy but from their ad now seem to have gone high-rise. Aha, wonderful! Thanks for that. Are you in Japan occasionally then? Let me know... Not recently, I got the recipe for Dry Mince Curry from Mr. Murti the Younger. Mr. Murti Senior used to pull the free salad routine on those who thought they could handle hot foods. Unfortunately beer doesn't help, although a liter bottle can make you feel like it doesn't matter. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
I have it on fair authority that current research in the field of
inertia free propulsion has shown great promise through the use of properly modified felines. There seem to be some modified felines at www.messybeast.com/winged-cats.htm and even some reports of flightworthiness! |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
There was some research into the theory of falling toast, and it was discovered that the toast did not always land with the buttered side down. Further investigation showed that this was because the wrong side had been buttered. I don't have the URL for this, unfortunately, so does anyone know what methods are used to ensure that the correct side is buttered? -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
There was some research into the theory of falling toast, and it was
discovered that the toast did not always land with the buttered side down. Further investigation showed that this was because the wrong side had been buttered. Then you know also of the experiment of fastening a piece of buttered toast (which always lands buttered-side-down) to the back of a cat (which always lands feet-down). Drop the combination from a reasonable height and it will hover in mid-air while the paradox is being resolved. -- Bruce B. Reynolds, Trailing Edge Technologies, Glenside PA |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Twydell wrote in message ...
There was some research into the theory of falling toast, and it was discovered that the toast did not always land with the buttered side down. Further investigation showed that this was because the wrong side had been buttered. I don't have the URL for this, unfortunately, so does anyone know what methods are used to ensure that the correct side is buttered? That is an easy one. The side on the plate that is downward is NOT the to be buttered side. To create a machine of great simplicity just butter BOTH sides and drop the slice of toast toward the floor. :-) |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Sarah Hotdesking wrote:
Probability of carpet impact is determined by the following simple formula: p = s * t(t)/t? 'p' is the probability of carpet impact, 's' is the "stain" value of the toast-covering substance - an indicator of the effectiveness of the toast topping in permanently staining the carpet. Chicken Tikka Masala, for example, has a very high s value, while the s value of water is zero. t? and t(t) indicate the tone of the carpet and topping - the value of p being strongly related to the relationship between the colour of the carpet and topping, as even Chicken Tikka Masala won't cause a permanent and obvious stain if the carpet is the same colour. I think you missed the important factor 'v' in the above equation. 'v' is the value of the carpet. Syiad -- Live every life as if it were your last. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:09:29 GMT, Mike Lechnar
wrote: How did this secret information make it into the public domain? I've been a practicing Aircraft Performance Engineer for the past 26 years and have always tried to explain how airplanes fly by using the official public explanations regarding Bernoulli, airfoils and other such rot. Civilians just weren't ready for the truth. In fact, we generally don't speak about the magic directly. Most of our plans and estimates usually end with the phrase "and then a miracle happens". I let the cat out of the bag over a decade ago. Here, in a sci.aeronautics posting from 1994, is the explanation of lift demons. It has since been elaborated a bit. Subject: Lift demons Mary Shafer ) explains lift: OK, here it is--the real, intuitively-obvious-even-to-the-lay-person explanation of lift. People, lift is caused by lift demons. These little, invisible demons hold on to the leading and trailing edges of the aircraft and lift it into the air by flapping their wings (so, in a reductionist sense, lift is actually caused by feathers). Some of the demons are a little confused and they hold on backwards, causing drag. The reason that planes stall at high alpha is that the leading edge demons get scared and let go when they can't see the ground anymore. Lift demons have good taste and don't like to look at ugly aircraft, so they hold on backwards on ugly planes. That's why gliders have so much lift and so little drag and why F-4s have lots of drag. John Wolter ) asked: What I would like is a simple *intuitive* explanation of what causes lift on a lift demon's wing. (Here we go again... ;-) Mary Shafer ) replied: Feathers. The multiple filaments on feathers trap the air molecules and they struggle to escape, which causes the action-reaction that we call lift. Bat wings don't have feathers but they're hairy and that works just about as well (air molecules are a little claustrophobic). And Richard Winterstein ) suggested another mechanism: It was originally believed smaller lift demons, who had their lift produced by even smaller lift demons, etc., as proposed by the great Greek philosopher/scientist Miasma. However, with the revival of scientific knowledge that eventually ended the Dark Ages, it was realized that this situation was unresolvable according to Zeno's paradox. Of course, the 'infinite demons' theory works in many problems of engineering significance, but a real understanding requires that the ether be introduced into the analysis at some point. The ether concept, of course, explains why planes fly more efficiently at higher altitudes, and, of course, is an absolute necessity when studying orbital and interplanetary travel, where (it is believed) many of the lift demons are unable to breathe. Hope that settles the question. And in a follow-up: Do shock waves act like cattle prods and make the lift deamons try to escape? Is why supersonic aircraft are so fast and so noisy. Why do blimps work? -D [Moderator's note: Blimps work because the lift demons can cling to the seams in the envelope and the wires for the advertising lights, of course. And there are specialized supersonic lift demons (they hang around Harley-Davidsons when there's nothing flying) that are a little noisy. Transonic drag rise/lift reduction is caused by the subsonic lift demons handing off to the supersonic lift demons, since there are only so many places for the demon to grab on. I'd never thought about the shock waves--any ideas out there? MFS] -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
actually, it is a very simple answer,
Money the more you throw at a plane, the faster/higher it goes. Matt Gunsch, A&P,IA,Private Pilot Riding member of the 2003 world champion drill team Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team GWRRA,NRA,GOA |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:38:31 -0800, Mary Shafer wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:09:29 GMT, Mike Lechnar wrote: How did this secret information make it into the public domain? I've been a practicing Aircraft Performance Engineer for the past 26 years and have always tried to explain how airplanes fly by using the official public explanations regarding Bernoulli, airfoils and other such rot. Civilians just weren't ready for the truth. In fact, we generally don't speak about the magic directly. Most of our plans and estimates usually end with the phrase "and then a miracle happens". I let the cat out of the bag over a decade ago. Here, in a sci.aeronautics posting from 1994, is the explanation of lift demons. It has since been elaborated a bit. Subject: Lift demons Mary Shafer ) explains lift: OK, here it is--the real, intuitively-obvious-even-to-the-lay-person explanation of lift. People, lift is caused by lift demons. These little, invisible demons hold on to the leading and trailing edges of the aircraft and lift it into the air by flapping their wings (so, in a reductionist sense, lift is actually caused by feathers). Some of the demons are a little confused and they hold on backwards, causing drag. The reason that planes stall at high alpha is that the leading edge demons get scared and let go when they can't see the ground anymore. Lift demons have good taste and don't like to look at ugly aircraft, so they hold on backwards on ugly planes. That's why gliders have so much lift and so little drag and why F-4s have lots of drag. John Wolter ) asked: What I would like is a simple *intuitive* explanation of what causes lift on a lift demon's wing. (Here we go again... ;-) Mary Shafer ) replied: Feathers. The multiple filaments on feathers trap the air molecules and they struggle to escape, which causes the action-reaction that we call lift. Bat wings don't have feathers but they're hairy and that works just about as well (air molecules are a little claustrophobic). And Richard Winterstein ) suggested another mechanism: It was originally believed smaller lift demons, who had their lift produced by even smaller lift demons, etc., as proposed by the great Greek philosopher/scientist Miasma. However, with the revival of scientific knowledge that eventually ended the Dark Ages, it was realized that this situation was unresolvable according to Zeno's paradox. Of course, the 'infinite demons' theory works in many problems of engineering significance, but a real understanding requires that the ether be introduced into the analysis at some point. The ether concept, of course, explains why planes fly more efficiently at higher altitudes, and, of course, is an absolute necessity when studying orbital and interplanetary travel, where (it is believed) many of the lift demons are unable to breathe. Hope that settles the question. And in a follow-up: Do shock waves act like cattle prods and make the lift deamons try to escape? Is why supersonic aircraft are so fast and so noisy. Why do blimps work? -D [Moderator's note: Blimps work because the lift demons can cling to the seams in the envelope and the wires for the advertising lights, of course. And there are specialized supersonic lift demons (they hang around Harley-Davidsons when there's nothing flying) that are a little noisy. Transonic drag rise/lift reduction is caused by the subsonic lift demons handing off to the supersonic lift demons, since there are only so many places for the demon to grab on. I'd never thought about the shock waves--any ideas out there? MFS] But according to that theory, how do bees manage to fly, having no feathers or hairs on their wings? ;-) -- __________ ____---____ Marco Antonio Checa Funcke \_________D /-/---_----' Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru _H__/_/ http://machf.tripod.com '-_____|( remove the "no_me_j." and "sons.of." parts before replying |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |