F-15 Eagle and F-14 Tomcat

On 4 Jul 2004 18:40:06 -0700, Chris Range wrote:

What is the difference between
these two fighters?

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On 4 Jul 2004 18:40:06 -0700, Chris Range wrote:

What is the difference between
these two fighters?

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...


You're thinking of the F-14.

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 16:06:31 GMT, Thomas J. Paladino Jr. wrote:

"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On 4 Jul 2004 18:40:06 -0700, Chris Range wrote:

What is the difference between
these two fighters?

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...


You're thinking of the F-14.

Read what I meant, not what I typed! g

-Jeff B. (who fat-fingered the five)
yeff at erols dot com

"Yeff" wrote in message
...

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...


Hmmm..., I recall the F-14 being featured in a major Hollywood production,
not so the F-15.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Yeff" wrote in message
...

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...

Hmmm..., I recall the F-14 being featured in a major Hollywood production,
not so the F-15.

I have no dog in this fight, but didn't

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/

feature the F-15?

IIRC there was even a sequel (which probably sucked g).

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
New June 23:
Linux In 20 Steps: (at Blinkynet) http://snipurl.com/7amq

"Blinky the Shark" wrote:
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Yeff" wrote in message
...

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...

Hmmm..., I recall the F-14 being featured in a major Hollywood
production,
not so the F-15.

I have no dog in this fight, but didn't

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/

feature the F-15?

F-16's

IIRC there was even a sequel (which probably sucked g).

The original sucked and the studios made 3 more.

Brett wrote:

"Blinky the Shark" wrote:
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Yeff" wrote in message
...

The F-15 has a better Hollywood agent...

Hmmm..., I recall the F-14 being featured in a major Hollywood
production,
not so the F-15.

I have no dog in this fight, but didn't

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/

feature the F-15?

F-16's

Oh. Well, awright, then.

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
New June 23:
Linux In 20 Steps: (at Blinkynet) http://snipurl.com/7amq

"Blinky the Shark" wrote in message
...

I have no dog in this fight, but didn't

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/

feature the F-15?


No, the F-16 was featured in that piece of crap.



IIRC there was even a sequel (which probably sucked g).


I didn't see it, but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:19:45 GMT, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Blinky the Shark" wrote in message
...

I have no dog in this fight, but didn't

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/

feature the F-15?


No, the F-16 was featured in that piece of crap.



IIRC there was even a sequel (which probably sucked g).


I didn't see it, but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

The "Iron Eagle" series achieved the physical impossibility of both sucking
and blowing at the same time.

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message link.net...
"Blinky the Shark" wrote in message
...
IIRC there was even a sequel (which probably sucked g).


I didn't see it, but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

It did, in fact, all of the sequels did. That didn't stop me from
watching (parts of) them on the idiot box on occasion. I their
defence, they did show footage of some interesting aircraft, like
Rutan's Ares. I still want to know what they had to force feed those
Phantoms though to get them to pretend to be Migs :-)

Rob