A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Santa Monica discord continues



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 17, 05:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal



NBAA Pursues Court Challenge To SMO Closure
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...3607-full.html
NBAA filed a motion in a federal appeals court on Monday seeking a stop to
any actions that would affect aviation operations at Santa Monica Airport,
while the matter is under judicial review. The FAA and the city have
announced plans to close the airport in 2028 and to immediately reduce the
length of the sole runway from 4,973 feet to 3,500 feet. NBAA and others
asked the appeals court last month to review the legality of that
settlement. The new motion responds to a request by the FAA to dismiss that
petition.


On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:21:48 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 8:46:04 PM UTC-6, wrote:
wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 1:20:00 PM UTC-6, Larry Dighera wrote:


In this exercise at Santa Monica, the DART volunteers simulated an earthquake
that has closed the 405 and 10 Freeways, and the Pacific Coast Highway. In the
scenario, SMO’s runway could be damaged, but still usable.

Together, the 10 planes involved in the scenario could carry over 2,000 pounds
of supplies into SMO, and if needed, could fly five missions per day, getting
critical supplies to Red Cross volunteers on the ground, as well as the
hospitals they serve.

WOW, a whole FIVE missions in some cock-a-mammy scenario where the
runway survives but the freeways are closed. Note that LAX, the big
airport, could handle FIVE, FIFTY or FIVE Hundred flights under
this ditzy scheme.


Runways don't have overpasses, underpasses, or bridges over them, which
are what usually closes a freeway.

LAX is a long way from SMO.


It looks like 8 miles, fence line to fence line. "Long" if you have to walk.


How would you get from LAX to SMO with no freeways?


Surface streets: CA-1, Centinela, Sepulveda, Culver, etc.

Plus with my plan the SMO runway would become an extension of National Blvd. so the pavement would still be there.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Join us to help save Santa Monica Airport! Larry Dighera Piloting 8 September 13th 14 04:30 PM
Judge Dismisses Santa Monica Suit Orval Fairbairn Owning 0 February 17th 14 12:52 AM
Santa Monica Showdown: City v FAA Larry Dighera Piloting 23 May 16th 08 11:01 PM
Santa Monica Airport Bans Jet Traffic Larry Dighera Piloting 22 April 7th 08 10:52 PM
Santa Monica (KSMO) Tips or Gotchas? Hamish Reid Piloting 9 July 12th 05 11:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.