A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Winglet performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 22nd 11, 03:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Wayne Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 905
Default Winglet performance


"Berry" wrote in message ...
In article ,
BruceGreeff wrote:

When asked what airfoil he used on his HP winglets, Dick Schreder
replied "I use the ROF-POB airfoil. Questioned further he elaborated
"Round on front-pointy on back".


I am aware of a lot of Schreder sailplanes with winglets; however, I haven't come across any with Dick's plywood slabs described above bolted to the wingtip rib. Almost all the HP/RS-15 winglets are based on (copies of) the winglets described in the Free Flight page 6 article by Peter Masak.(http://www.wgc.mb.ca/sac/freeflight/92_02.pdf)

HP pilots note that winglets definitely improve aileron effectiveness resulting in higher roll rates.

Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

  #12  
Old February 22nd 11, 08:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
noel.wade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 681
Default Winglet performance

Just to throw my voice into the mix - my DG-300 was retrofitted with
(factory-supplied) winglets...

The difference in L/D is so small with most winglets, that even if its
working correctly it would be hard to notice... Like others have said
- its "almost as good as" an equal improvement in span. What's the L/
D difference between a good 15-meter ship and a good 16-meter ship?
Very little.

However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on. This is where I believe a lot of people derive benefit
from them: Improved airflow over the wing at slow speeds and while
turning can directly translate into better thermalling performance,
both in reduced drag and in improved aileron control/authority.

--Noel

  #13  
Old February 23rd 11, 02:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Winglet performance

On 2/22/2011 12:11 PM, noel.wade wrote:
Just to throw my voice into the mix - my DG-300 was retrofitted with
(factory-supplied) winglets...

The difference in L/D is so small with most winglets, that even if its
working correctly it would be hard to notice... Like others have said
- its "almost as good as" an equal improvement in span. What's the L/
D difference between a good 15-meter ship and a good 16-meter ship?
Very little.


No one can notice the difference between 40 and 42 in L/D. You might be
able to measure it with very careful measurements, but "notice" it? No.

However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on. This is where I believe a lot of people derive benefit
from them: Improved airflow over the wing at slow speeds and while
turning can directly translate into better thermalling performance,
both in reduced drag and in improved aileron control/authority.


Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground
roll, too. It makes a glider less likely to drop a wing at the start of
takeoff, or near the end of the rollout.

I retrofitted factory winglets to my ASH 26E. Besides the above, I could
see (and confirm with photographs), that the wingtips were higher in
flight with the winglets than without, evidence that the winglets had
shifted the lift distribution outwards. I have no idea if the cruise L/D
was changed.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
  #14  
Old February 23rd 11, 09:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Winglet performance

Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on.


Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground


The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is that
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.
  #15  
Old February 23rd 11, 09:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Winglet performance

On 2/23/2011 1:59 AM, John Smith wrote:
Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on.


Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground


The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is that
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.


And, you can put a tire on it and it won't slip off in the wind! Not
that I'm suggesting that is a good practice...

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
  #16  
Old February 23rd 11, 09:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Brad[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 722
Default Winglet performance

On Feb 23, 1:59*am, John Smith wrote:
Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on.

Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground


The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is that
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.


and to the younger, they look bitchin'

Brad
  #17  
Old February 24th 11, 01:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default Winglet performance

On Feb 23, 3:27*pm, Brad wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59*am, John Smith wrote:

Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on.
Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground


The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is that
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.


and to the younger, they look bitchin'

Brad


Bah! Draglets!

Just stick your toe under the (beautifully unencumbered) wingtip and
lift your foot - voila, no bending required at all...

Anyway, if winglets were so great, why don't they have their own
winglets? - ad infinitum!

Kirk
66


  #18  
Old February 24th 11, 05:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Winglet performance

At 13:11 24 February 2011, kirk.stant wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:27=A0pm, Brad wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59=A0am, John Smith wrote:

Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with

my
winglets on.
Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the

gro=
und

The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is

tha=
t
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.


and to the younger, they look bitchin'

Brad


Bah! Draglets!

Just stick your toe under the (beautifully unencumbered) wingtip and
lift your foot - voila, no bending required at all...

Anyway, if winglets were so great, why don't they have their own
winglets? - ad infinitum!

Kirk
66




you want winglets on winglets (wingwinglets? wing2lets?) ... Stanford got
there first :-)

http://aero.stanford.edu/CWing.html

Doug

  #19  
Old February 24th 11, 08:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Winglet performance

On Feb 24, 8:11*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:27*pm, Brad wrote:

On Feb 23, 1:59*am, John Smith wrote:


Greenwell wrote:
However, I do notice an improvement in slow-speed handling with my
winglets on.
Noel echos my experience, and it's not just in flight, but on the ground


The main benefit of winglets, especially for the older among us, is that
we don't have to bow that much to pick up the wing.


and to the younger, they look bitchin'


Brad


Bah! Draglets!

Just stick your toe under the (beautifully unencumbered) wingtip and
lift your foot - voila, no bending required at all...

Anyway, if winglets were so great, why don't they have their own
winglets? - ad infinitum!

Kirk
66


The law of diminishing returns.
I sense some closet winglet envy leading to denial.
UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comm Antenna in Winglet SoaringXCellence Soaring 3 November 22nd 10 02:56 AM
winglet weight Brad[_2_] Soaring 4 November 15th 08 12:07 AM
Winglet in flight Patrick R7 Aviation Photos 8 October 20th 08 10:13 PM
Winglet sliced off? [email protected] Piloting 15 October 12th 06 01:07 AM
Winglet Alternative? mike fadden Soaring 1 October 22nd 03 08:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.