A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How did F117 get it's designation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 19th 04, 09:12 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Long before the B1 and B2 there was the B52, B58, and B70.

That is why I asked.


Not long after fighters got north of 100, the USAF started over again.
Bombers followed not long after.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #12  
Old January 19th 04, 09:59 PM
Howard Berkowitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Cub Driver
wrote:

Long before the B1 and B2 there was the B52, B58, and B70.

That is why I asked.


Not long after fighters got north of 100, the USAF started over again.
Bombers followed not long after.


In what is mostly a comedy what-if, I picture some hotshot P-38 driver
hearing an F[1]-22 is nearby, and laughing at the idea of dogfighting an
antique until "WTF was THAT?"

[1] Yes, I know, I know, it should have been P-22, and F-22 would have
been a recon bird at the time. Still...
  #13  
Old January 23rd 04, 11:39 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andreas Parsch" wrote in message
...

The speculation is rather academic anyway, because the was a valid reason
why the JSF demonstrators used [snip] non-sequential
numbers.


That valid reason being the assignment of the intervening numbers, X-33 and
X-34, to other projects.


  #14  
Old January 24th 04, 02:32 PM
Andreas Parsch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
The speculation is rather academic anyway, because the was a valid reason
why the JSF demonstrators used [snip] non-sequential
numbers.


That valid reason being the assignment of the intervening numbers, X-33
and X-34, to other projects.


.... and that the X-32 slot, originally assigned to the JAST (Joint Advanced
Strike Technology) program, was taken over by the JSF program. Although
JSF's objectives were much different than JAST's (develop - in the long
term - an operational aircraft vs. "only" technology demonstration), JSF
was effectively a continuation of JAST by another name. Therefore keeping
the allocated vehicle designation was a logical decision, even if the JSF
demonstrator(s) wouldn't be _purely_ experimental machines. If JSF hadn't
had JAST as a precursor program, it's IMHO much more likely the aircraft
would have been designated F-24/25 from the beginning.

Andreas


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canadian ATC aircraft designation abripl Home Built 2 February 4th 05 05:35 PM
Designation Book David R Townend Aviation Marketplace 0 September 4th 04 02:29 AM
Aircraft Designation Book David R Townend Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 03 02:25 AM
Aircraft Designation Book David R Townend Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 16th 03 02:25 AM
Aircraft Designation Book David R Townend Home Built 0 October 16th 03 02:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.