A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The F-102 Delta Dagger (Was GWB as a Nat'l Guard Fighter Pilot threads.)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old February 15th 04, 11:09 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Question on the F-102:

When the pilot went to fire missiles, he presumably had to open the
missile-bay doors.

Could this be done at supersonic speeds, or what speed did he have to
slow to?

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #32  
Old February 15th 04, 12:46 PM
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Stickney wrote:

(Secret Analysts Trick - When somebody boasts that they've invented a
"Hittile", a missile so accurate that it doesn't need a Proximity
Fuze, that menasn that they couldn't get one to work, and thas are
trying to make a feature out of a bug.)


Ah, so you've heard of BAC Rapier too, I see.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
  #33  
Old February 15th 04, 02:32 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Cub Driver writes:

Question on the F-102:

When the pilot went to fire missiles, he presumably had to open the
missile-bay doors.

Could this be done at supersonic speeds, or what speed did he have to
slow to?


According to my copy of the F-102A Dash One, there are no limits on
opening the bay doors that don't apply to the rest of teh airplane.

Dan, I've got an electronic Copy of the F-102S Standard Aircraft
Characteristics Chart. Would that be useful to you?
Among other things, it includes graphical representations of the
flight enveloped adn stuff like speed/range tradeoffs.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #34  
Old February 15th 04, 03:17 PM
Urban Fredriksson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Kevin Brooks wrote:

No argument there. But were the *Rb-27's* still in service after the
eighties?


Sure. The J 35J rebuild programme ran from 1987-91 and
it's not logical to upgrade them to better use(*) a certain
missile if it's going out of service. Also, it's not hard to
find photos of Finnish Drakens from the 90's with RB 27s
(so I think the real RB 27 retirement date is 2000).

*The armament upgrades we Improved gun installtion
(which could be noted in a certain other thread here), air
to air rocket capability (again, after being deleted on
the J 35F), two more wet pylons and two more Sidewinder
only pylons and ability to employ _all missile types_ head up
or head down.
To me, it's obvious Draken needed a radar guided
missile, otherwise it couldn't be a full capability stand
in for Viggen. Why the IR RB 28 was retained I've never
gotten a very clear answer to, only a slightly evasive
"it's better for some situation".
--
Urban Fredriksson http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
  #35  
Old February 15th 04, 03:38 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Peter Stickney) wrote:
Cub Driver writes:


Question on the F-102:


When the pilot went to fire missiles, he presumably had to open the
missile-bay doors.


Could this be done at supersonic speeds, or what speed did he have to
slow to?


According to my copy of the F-102A Dash One, there are no limits on
opening the bay doors that don't apply to the rest of teh airplane.


Also, the missile bay doors themselves housed the F-102's 24 2.75-inch
folding fin rockets.

  #36  
Old February 15th 04, 04:31 PM
Andreas Parsch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Brooks wrote:

No argument there. But were the *Rb-27's* still in service after the
eighties? If so, Andreas needs to change his info...


Ok, ok, so I did :-) ... I don't know why I _ever_ thought that certain
printed sources provided reliable information ;-)

Andreas

  #37  
Old February 15th 04, 09:11 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dan, I've got an electronic Copy of the F-102S Standard Aircraft
Characteristics Chart. Would that be useful to you?
Among other things, it includes graphical representations of the
flight enveloped adn stuff like speed/range tradeoffs.


Pete, that would be great. Send email to and
I'll reply with my home address. Thanks!

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:


see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #38  
Old February 16th 04, 12:42 AM
David Hartung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark T. Evert" wrote in message
...

OK. I have seen the debate over GWB as an F-102 pilot, so I was

wondering
about a couple of things.

First, was the F-102 taken out of service in the early 1970s?


Yes....the Duece as it was called in Air Force circles was phased out of
most National Guard units in the early 70's. I recall the Pennsylvania
National Guard replacing them with A7 Corsairs while in Texas they were
replaced with F101 VooDoos.

Second, if GWB was trained on the F-102, and had asked about other

planes,
would he have been assigned to the -106 or was Texas going to a

different
fighter?


The Texas Guard transitioned to the F101 Voodoo which they flew till the
early 80's when they moved to the F4 and now they fly F16's


Somewhere around 1979-1980, we at Luke, were training the Texas ANG to fly
F4Cs.


  #39  
Old February 16th 04, 12:54 AM
David Hartung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...

The six also had an area-ruled fuse, that is significant for a +mach bird.


As did the Deuce.


  #40  
Old February 16th 04, 12:59 AM
Tex Houston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Hartung" wrote in message
...

"Mark T. Evert" wrote in message
...


The Texas Guard transitioned to the F101 Voodoo which they flew till the
early 80's when they moved to the F4 and now they fly F16's


Somewhere around 1979-1980, we at Luke, were training the Texas ANG to

fly
F4Cs.


Wednesday evening I'm having dinner in a resturant part of which is a former
Texas Air National Guard (K)C-97.

Tex



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
D.C. Air Guard Unit Flies New 737s Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 14th 04 11:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.